Re: [gentoo-user] strange eix-sync

2013-07-17 Thread Douglas J Hunley
On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 7:40 AM, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote: /dev/root on / type ext4 (rw,noatime,user_xattr,commit=60,barrier=1,data=ordered) You don't have a separate mount for /tmp, so the above would be pertinent. And it shows support for xattr, so you should be good -- Douglas J Hunley

Re: [gentoo-user] strange eix-sync

2013-07-13 Thread Douglas J Hunley
On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 1:19 AM, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote: How can I pratically proof the availability of xattr on the filesystem of /tmp -- beside checking the kernel config. Is your /tmp a tmpfs? What's the output of 'mount' please? -- Douglas J Hunley (doug.hun...@gmail.com) Twitter:

Re: [gentoo-user] strange eix-sync

2013-07-13 Thread meino . cramer
Douglas J Hunley doug.hun...@gmail.com [13-07-13 13:36]: On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 1:19 AM, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote: How can I pratically proof the availability of xattr on the filesystem of /tmp -- beside checking the kernel config. Is your /tmp a tmpfs? What's the output of 'mount'

Re: [gentoo-user] strange eix-sync

2013-07-13 Thread Stroller
On 13 July 2013, at 12:40, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote: ... I also removed (as an experiement) the acl and xattr use flags from rsyncno success (the original settings only remove the xattr-flags). Again, Meino, you're not stating clearly enough what you've done. Did you unset these USE

Re: [gentoo-user] strange eix-sync

2013-07-12 Thread meino . cramer
Stroller strol...@stellar.eclipse.co.uk [13-07-12 00:51]: On 11 July 2013, at 19:58, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote: ... beaglebone:/rootKrm -v rm: remove regular empty file ‘/tmp/foobar123’? yes removed ‘/tmp/foobar123’ ... Everything was done as root. I think this is the output

Re: [gentoo-user] strange eix-sync

2013-07-11 Thread Douglas J Hunley
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 12:06 PM, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote: is this a newly added feature, which is needed? Since three days (about) before it works like a charm. Beside updateing my system, I did nothing to change the filesytem (ext4 if I remember correctly) or such ... Any ideas, what

Re: [gentoo-user] strange eix-sync

2013-07-11 Thread Stroller
On 9 July 2013, at 18:28, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote: ... receiving incremental file list timestamp.chk rsync: failed to set permissions on /tmp/.tmpNBwK63.n6Acda: Function not implemented (38) I can't say the problem is related to xattrs, but when posting an error with a message like this

Re: [gentoo-user] strange eix-sync

2013-07-11 Thread meino . cramer
Stroller strol...@stellar.eclipse.co.uk [13-07-11 18:12]: On 9 July 2013, at 18:28, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote: ... receiving incremental file list timestamp.chk rsync: failed to set permissions on /tmp/.tmpNBwK63.n6Acda: Function not implemented (38) I can't say the problem is

Re: [gentoo-user] strange eix-sync

2013-07-11 Thread Stroller
On 11 July 2013, at 19:58, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote: ... beaglebone:/rootKrm -v rm: remove regular empty file ‘/tmp/foobar123’? yes removed ‘/tmp/foobar123’ ... Everything was done as root. I think this is the output of `rm -vi $file` not `rm -v $file` - this suggests you have at least

Re: [gentoo-user] strange eix-sync

2013-07-10 Thread Douglas J Hunley
On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 1:28 PM, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote: rsync: failed to set permissions on /tmp/.tmpNBwK63.n6Acda: Function not implemented (38) You don't have POSIX ACL )xattr) support on whatever fs you have for /tmp ? -- Douglas J Hunley (doug.hun...@gmail.com) Twitter: @hunleyd

Re: [gentoo-user] strange eix-sync

2013-07-10 Thread meino . cramer
Douglas J Hunley doug.hun...@gmail.com [13-07-10 17:24]: On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 1:28 PM, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote: rsync: failed to set permissions on /tmp/.tmpNBwK63.n6Acda: Function not implemented (38) You don't have POSIX ACL )xattr) support on whatever fs you have for /tmp ?

[gentoo-user] strange eix-sync

2013-07-09 Thread meino . cramer
Hi, eix-syncing my Beaglebone results in some strange output and no eix-sync at all. Especially those rsync: failed to set permissions on /tmp/.tmpNBwK63.n6Acda: Function not implemented (38) are mysterious. I added the complete log below. I dont want to trigger a ban of my IP for too