On Mon, 23 Apr 2012 11:18:40 +0800
kwk...@hkbn.net wrote:
On Mon, 23 Apr 2012 09:12:48 +0700
Pandu Poluan pa...@poluan.info wrote:
On Apr 23, 2012 1:09 AM, Volker Armin Hemmann
volkerar...@googlemail.com wrote:
Am Sonntag, 22. April 2012, 19:52:16 schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
Rebuilt everything. Congrats
Am 23.04.2012 04:17 schrieb Pandu Poluan pa...@poluan.info:
On Apr 23, 2012 1:09 AM, Volker Armin Hemmann volkerar...@googlemail.com
wrote:
Am Sonntag,...
What about statically linked packages?
Rgds,
Strange, never had problems in that regard.
Am 23.04.2012 05:24 schrieb kwk...@hkbn.net:
On Mon, 23 Apr 2012 09:12:48 +0700
Pandu Poluan pa...@poluan.info wrote:
On Apr 23, 2012 1:09 A...
Bless those who keeps on telling people there is no need to rebuild
packages after glibc upgrade, for they
Am 23.04.2012 04:12, schrieb Pandu Poluan:
On Apr 23, 2012 1:09 AM, Volker Armin Hemmann
volkerar...@googlemail.com mailto:volkerar...@googlemail.com wrote:
Am Sonntag, 22. April 2012, 19:52:16 schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
Just browsed the changelog of glibc-2.15:
On Mon, 23 Apr 2012 14:42:28 +0200
Volker Armin Hemmann volkerar...@googlemail.com wrote:
Strange, never had problems in that regard.
See, for example, the problem described in thread
http://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-user/msg_264b8690e0ab67e3f55c0967cba101ec.xml
from this list last November
Am Montag, 23. April 2012, 06:31:31 schrieb Graham Murray:
kwk...@hkbn.net writes:
Bless those who keeps on telling people there is no need to rebuild
packages after glibc upgrade, for they must have not used pam or any
other packages that uses dlopen().
So which packages need to be
Just browsed the changelog of glibc-2.15:
http://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2012-03/msg00836.html
When I read the NEWS section there with all that optimized stuff I
wonder if it makes any sense to rebuild packages here after upgrading glibc?
Stefan
Am Sonntag, 22. April 2012, 19:52:16 schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
Just browsed the changelog of glibc-2.15:
http://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2012-03/msg00836.html
When I read the NEWS section there with all that optimized stuff I
wonder if it makes any sense to rebuild packages here
Am 22.04.2012 20:05, schrieb Volker Armin Hemmann:
no, because it is a library. You make use of it anyway.
Ah, yes, sure ... thanks for the explanation.
On Apr 23, 2012 1:09 AM, Volker Armin Hemmann volkerar...@googlemail.com
wrote:
Am Sonntag, 22. April 2012, 19:52:16 schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
Just browsed the changelog of glibc-2.15:
http://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2012-03/msg00836.html
When I read the NEWS section there with
On Mon, 23 Apr 2012 09:12:48 +0700
Pandu Poluan pa...@poluan.info wrote:
On Apr 23, 2012 1:09 AM, Volker Armin Hemmann
volkerar...@googlemail.com wrote:
Am Sonntag, 22. April 2012, 19:52:16 schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
Just browsed the changelog of glibc-2.15:
kwk...@hkbn.net writes:
Bless those who keeps on telling people there is no need to rebuild
packages after glibc upgrade, for they must have not used pam or any
other packages that uses dlopen().
So which packages need to be rebuilt? Owing to the initial
non-availability of the patch file,
12 matches
Mail list logo