rocwhite168 wrote:
Kaddehkaddehat gmail.com writes:
it would help to also put your /etc/fstaband let us know what FS you have root
setup asin addition to your /boot/grub/grub.conf
2010/6/20 rocwhite168rocwhite168at 163.com
I used genkernel to configure the kernel. It
Dale rdalek1967 at gmail.com writes:
I notice you are using ext4 for the root partition file system. Do you
have support for ext4 compiled in the kernel? Not as a module but built
into the kernel? Using modules is OK but things that it has to have to
get to the point where it can
rocwhite168 wrote:
Dalerdalek1967at gmail.com writes:
I notice you are using ext4 for the root partition file system. Do you
have support for ext4 compiled in the kernel? Not as a module but built
into the kernel? Using modules is OK but things that it has to have to
get to the point
Dale rdalek1967 at gmail.com writes:
I sort of think this is in there but make sure you did the same for your
drive controllers as well. You may also want to try this link.
http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-p-4173972.html#4173972
I haven't had to put that on mine but maybe something
rocwhite168 wrote:
Dalerdalek1967at gmail.com writes:
I sort of think this is in there but make sure you did the same for your
drive controllers as well. You may also want to try this link.
http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-p-4173972.html#4173972
I haven't had to put that on mine but
On 06/21/2010 09:46 PM, rocwhite168 wrote:
Walter Dneswaltdnesat waltdnes.org writes:
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 02:57:58PM +0800, rocwhite168 wrote
On the other hand, I'm trying to configure the kernel manually. I
did this according to several online tutorials, but it still won't
even start
On 6/22/10, rocwhite168 rocwhite...@163.com wrote:
fstab
--
/dev/sda1 /boot ext4noauto,noatime 1 2
/dev/sda5 / ext4noatime 0 1
/dev/sda3 /usrext4
On 22 June 2010 02:14, Christopher Swift christopher.sw...@linux.com wrote:
I've setup my Gentoo box to use en_GB as the default locale
in /etc/env.d/02locale with tips from the Gentoo Localisation Guide[0].
Is it at all possible to set a locale, i.e. cy_GB to be the primary LANG
parameter but
On Tue, 22 Jun 2010 16:00:08 +0300, Arttu V. wrote:
fstab
--
/dev/sda1 /boot ext4
noauto,noatime 1 2 /dev/sda5 /
ext4noatime 0
1 /dev/sda3 /usrext4
noatime
Hello,
Conntrack-tools
Look here:
http://conntrack-tools.netfilter.org/testcase.html
Is anyone doing this, and willing to share configs, answer questions,
or point to other examples?
Lots of new kernel stuff for ip tables, since I sank deeply into the
abyss of minutia of IP tables. Further
Mick michaelkintzios at gmail.com writes:
I have this ati card. I'm having trouble finding a stable
ati-driver + xorg-server combination that will compile.
uname -mr
2.6.33-gentoo-r2 x86_64 x11-base/xorg-server-1.7.6
x11-drivers/xf86-video-ati-6.12.6
but will play in Opera.
Have you noticed the same and is there a fix (other than emerging
firefox-bin as the enotice is telling me?
--
Regards,
Mick
On 2010-06-18 12:17 PM, Bill Longman wrote:
And finally, don't even mention how braindead the new improved
grub is. I wonder how anyone can feel that having to write six
paragraphs in some one-off bash-like language, which needs to be
debugged, is better than four lines in a config file.
On 22 June 2010 15:33, James wirel...@tampabay.rr.com wrote:
Hello,
Conntrack-tools
Look here:
http://conntrack-tools.netfilter.org/testcase.html
Is anyone doing this, and willing to share configs, answer questions,
or point to other examples?
Lots of new kernel stuff for ip tables,
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 10:54 AM, Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote:
but will play in Opera.
Have you noticed the same and is there a fix (other than emerging
firefox-bin as the enotice is telling me?
Are you using 64-bit or 32-bit? If 64, you need to emerge
nspluginwrapper set up the
Ar Maw, 2010-06-22 am 14:38 +0100, ysgrifennodd Mick:
I'm also interested in this - although my question is probably simpler:
I would like to use en_GB but I do not undestand why running 'locale'
as a plain user shows:
$ locale
LANG=en_US.UTF-8
LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 11:13 AM, Paul Hartman
paul.hartman+gen...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 10:54 AM, Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote:
but will play in Opera.
Have you noticed the same and is there a fix (other than emerging
firefox-bin as the enotice is telling me?
Are
On 06/21/2010 10:20 PM, rocwhite168 wrote:
Dale rdalek1967 at gmail.com writes:
I notice you are using ext4 for the root partition file system. Do you
have support for ext4 compiled in the kernel? Not as a module but built
into the kernel? Using modules is OK but things that it has
On 22 June 2010 17:16, Paul Hartman paul.hartman+gen...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 11:13 AM, Paul Hartman
paul.hartman+gen...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 10:54 AM, Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote:
but will play in Opera.
Have you noticed the same and is there
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 12:03 PM, Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote:
On 22 June 2010 17:16, Paul Hartman paul.hartman+gen...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 11:13 AM, Paul Hartman
paul.hartman+gen...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 10:54 AM, Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com
Mick michaelkintzios at gmail.com writes:
Howdy Mick!
I can't add anything about conntrackd, because I have not used it, but
I'd recommend to use the limit module and set it to something sensible
(e.g. 3/minute) when logging invalid packets, if you want to avoid
bogging down your fw. So use
On Tuesday 22 June 2010 19:03:00 Mick wrote:
On 22 June 2010 17:16, Paul Hartman paul.hartman+gen...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 11:13 AM, Paul Hartman
paul.hartman+gen...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 10:54 AM, Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote:
but will
Tanstaafl wrote:
On 2010-06-18 12:17 PM, Bill Longman wrote:
And finally, don't even mention how braindead the new improved
grub is. I wonder how anyone can feel that having to write six
paragraphs in some one-off bash-like language, which needs to be
debugged, is better than four lines in
On 06/22/2010 11:44 AM, Dale wrote:
Tanstaafl wrote:
On 2010-06-18 12:17 PM, Bill Longman wrote:
And finally, don't even mention how braindead the new improved
grub is. I wonder how anyone can feel that having to write six
paragraphs in some one-off bash-like language, which needs to be
tis 2010-06-22 klockan 12:15 -0700 skrev walt:
On 06/22/2010 11:44 AM, Dale wrote:
Tanstaafl wrote:
On 2010-06-18 12:17 PM, Bill Longman wrote:
And finally, don't even mention how braindead the new improved
grub is. I wonder how anyone can feel that having to write six
paragraphs in
On Dienstag 22 Juni 2010, walt wrote:
On 06/22/2010 11:44 AM, Dale wrote:
Tanstaafl wrote:
On 2010-06-18 12:17 PM, Bill Longman wrote:
And finally, don't even mention how braindead the new improved
grub is. I wonder how anyone can feel that having to write six
paragraphs in some one-off
Anyone tried gujin http://gujin.sourceforge.net/ ? I think it may
become an alernative to grub2, but I never found anyone who have used
it.
--
==
Ivan Sichmann Freitas
Engenharia de Computação 2009
UNICAMP
http://identi.ca/ivansichmann
Grupo Pró
On 06/21/2010 03:37 PM, Dale wrote:
I'm not saying you can't use it just that it doesn't always work. Thing
is, when someone uses genkernel to make the kernel, when someone asks
'did you include some driver', the usual answer is 'I don't know, I used
genkernel' and then nobody knows whether
On 06/22/2010 12:29 PM, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
On Dienstag 22 Juni 2010, walt wrote:
On 06/22/2010 11:44 AM, Dale wrote:
Tanstaafl wrote:
On 2010-06-18 12:17 PM, Bill Longman wrote:
And finally, don't even mention how braindead the new improved
grub is. I wonder how anyone can feel that
On Tuesday 22 June 2010 19:34:19 you wrote:
On Tuesday 22 June 2010 19:03:00 Mick wrote:
On 22 June 2010 17:16, Paul Hartman paul.hartman+gen...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 11:13 AM, Paul Hartman
paul.hartman+gen...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 10:54 AM,
again ... I consider buying a new box for work.
currently I am still quite happy with my core2duo E6600 with 8 gigs of
ram, running ~amd64 ... running fine.
but I remember the huge step back then from the pentium 4 ...
Will it be the same when I go for a core i5?
I use that box for
Hi there!
I am having big trouble setting up ISDN. I'm a long-time ISDN user, I need
this for connecting to some remote systems that do not have an internet
connection. I always used my server for this, but due to a sudden
breakdown of phone+dsl on that machine (which is far away, I have no
On 06/22/2010 02:56 PM, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
again ... I consider buying a new box for work.
currently I am still quite happy with my core2duo E6600 with 8 gigs of
ram, running ~amd64 ... running fine.
but I remember the huge step back then from the pentium 4 ...
Will it be the
And again, I had already written an answer to your last posting, but then
my dreaded mouse problem in KDE4 happened again, and I forgot to save the
mail as draft before logging out and in again.
Mick writes:
On Tuesday 22 June 2010 19:34:19 you wrote:
On Tuesday 22 June 2010 19:03:00 Mick
I've had this problem for a while now but it's finally driven me mad.
I have a directory with some local mercurial repos. I'm the only user
who touches these repos.
Things will go fine for a while, and suddenly I'll do a commit and then
hg will die with
abort: Permission denied:
on one of
Please remind me what we are supposed to do when we get:
* Package 'net-libs/neon-0.29.3' NOT merged due to file collisions. If
* necessary, refer to your elog messages for the whole content of the
* above message.
Checking for file ownership gives me:
# portageq owners /
Mick writes:
Please remind me what we are supposed to do when we get:
* Package 'net-libs/neon-0.29.3' NOT merged due to file collisions. If
* necessary, refer to your elog messages for the whole content of the
* above message.
You could force installation with
On 06/23/2010 01:56 AM, Alex Schuster wrote:
Mick writes:
Checking for file ownership gives me:
# portageq owners / /usr/bin/neon-config
net-misc/neon-0.29.3
/usr/bin/neon-config
# portageq owners / /usr/include/neon/ne_207.h
net-misc/neon-0.29.3
/usr/include/neon/ne_207.h
On 06/22/2010 12:29 PM, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
And what have mobos to do with the fact that whenever GNU lay their dirty
hands on a project they will not rest until they turned something decent and
useful into an overly complex, drowned in obscure options and hard to
configure mess?
I
walt w41ter at gmail.com writes:
I recall reading threads about problems caused by putting the root partition
on a raid volume, but I've never understood what the problems are. Is that
your situation? Maybe someone else can remind us about it.
I guess not. I'm not using RAID.
Thanks,
Bill Longman bill.longman at gmail.com writes:
Yes, it's built-in. I have attached a copy of my kernel config file in the
original post.
I'll bet you don't have HUGETLBFS turned on in your kernel. It's
required for ext4.
I checked and both HUGETLBFS and HUGETLB_PAGE are enabled.
Dale rdalek1967 at gmail.com writes:
I did some googling. Seriously grasping at straws here. Do you have
SMP enabled? If so, do you really have a multiprocessor or multicore
machine? I ask beause I did find where someone else had SMP enabled and
it shouldn't have been. I noticed it
Dell latitude E6510, ~amd64
kernel: 2-6.34 (gentoo sources)
lspci -vnn
03:00.0 Network controller [0280]: Broadcom Corporation Device [14e4:4727] (rev
01)
Subsystem: Dell Device [1028:0010]
Flags: bus master, fast devsel, latency 0, IRQ 11
Memory at e6e0 (64-bit,
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 2:56 PM, Stefan G. Weichinger li...@xunil.at wrote:
again ... I consider buying a new box for work.
currently I am still quite happy with my core2duo E6600 with 8 gigs of
ram, running ~amd64 ... running fine.
but I remember the huge step back then from the pentium 4
Bill Longman wrote:
On 06/21/2010 03:37 PM, Dale wrote:
I'm not saying you can't use it just that it doesn't always work. Thing
is, when someone uses genkernel to make the kernel, when someone asks
'did you include some driver', the usual answer is 'I don't know, I used
genkernel' and then
rocwhite168 wrote:
Dalerdalek1967at gmail.com writes:
I did some googling. Seriously grasping at straws here. Do you have
SMP enabled? If so, do you really have a multiprocessor or multicore
machine? I ask beause I did find where someone else had SMP enabled and
it shouldn't have
Well this was interesting...
One thing that mercurial does is if you clone a repo and the target
directory is on the same filesystem as the source, it create hardlinks
of files on the destination for efficiency. Well this is fine, but...
One of the things my project does is create a virtual
On 6/22/2010 1:46 PM, Bill Longman wrote:
Because of EFI firmware, that's why mobos would effect it. Like the Sun
Openboot PROM docs say somewhere: BIOS? We don't need no stinkin'
BIOS. Same with the lame x86 status quo. At least nowadays we could
have two different versions of it on board and
48 matches
Mail list logo
