Hi,
Please, could someone suggest easy to use proxy server which supports SSL?
Thanks
Pat
Freehosting PIPNI - http://www.pipni.cz/
On 17 Feb 2014 16:15, pat p...@xvalheru.org wrote:
Hi,
Please, could someone suggest easy to use proxy server which supports SSL?
Thanks
Pat
Freehosting PIPNI - http://www.pipni.cz/
Forward - squid, apache.
Reverse - squid, apache, nginx
On Feb 17, 2014 11:46 AM, pat p...@xvalheru.org wrote:
Hi,
Please, could someone suggest easy to use proxy server which supports SSL?
Thanks
Pat
Freehosting PIPNI - http://www.pipni.cz/
Have a look at squid
On Monday 17 Feb 2014 10:44:36 pat wrote:
Hi,
Please, could someone suggest easy to use proxy server which supports SSL?
Thanks
Pat
There are many options depending on your requirements. You can use apache, or
nginx, or net-proxy/tinyproxy, or even net-misc/proxytunnel. You can
Thanks to all who chimed in...
On 2014-02-16 3:27 PM, Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 1:26 PM, Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote:
[snip]
You may have lost it in the link that Volker posted (thanks Volker), but this
comment from HaakonKL probably sums it
On 02/17/2014 06:17 AM, Tanstaafl wrote:
Thanks to all who chimed in...
On 2014-02-16 3:27 PM, Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 1:26 PM, Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote:
[snip]
You may have lost it in the link that Volker posted (thanks Volker),
but
On Monday 17 February 2014 04:12 AM, Edward M wrote:
On Sun, 16 Feb 2014 14:14:24 +0530
Nilesh Govindrajan m...@nileshgr.com wrote:
rvices to customers, so compatibility is
definitely a concern. I'm not exactly sure what the differences are
between Oracle JDK OpenJDK; the differences I
On 17/02/2014 14:17, Tanstaafl wrote:
In fact, it seems to me that, since (from what I've read) the primary
reason that systemd was written in the first place was to provide
extremely fast boots *in virtualized environments*, having it be a
choice made by selecting a corresponding *profile* is
On Sun, 16 February 2014, at 4:41 pm, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com
wrote:
...
Whatever problems Red Hat are trying to solve in the Red Hat space are
problems that do not affect me, so I do not need Red Hat's solution. As
for Gnome, I have yet to see a valid reason why Gnome *must*
On Mon, 17 Feb 2014 07:22:17 +0200
Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote:
How long has it been since Debian decided to go with systemd? Like,
three? So, up until three days ago I would have disagreed since
despite original upstream ditching ConsoleKit, it was still being
maintained by
Sorry for top post using my phone
Ice tea is Java se. Glass server uses
Java EE because EE has added API and
Runtime to build enterprise secure apps.
sorry the link did not help.
Sent from my Windows Phone
From: Nilesh Govindrajanmailto:m...@nileshgr.com
Sent:
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 6:17 AM, Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org wrote:
[snip]
Maybe it is 'full of errors', but is the primary point true?
False implies whatever you want it to imply. You can't prove anything
if your assumptions are incorrect.
There is actually little code inside PID 1;
On Sun, 16 Feb 2014 15:16:36 -0600 Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 2:58 PM, Volker Armin Hemmann
volkerar...@googlemail.com wrote:
Am 16.02.2014 21:08, schrieb Canek Peláez Valdés:
On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 12:59 PM, Volker Armin Hemmann
volkerar...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Mon, 17 Feb 2014 11:13:39 -0600 Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
It simply doesn't matter if systemd boils down to one monolithic binary, or
600, if they are tied together in such a way that they can not
*individually* be replaced *easily and simply* (ie, without having to
rewrite the whole
Sorry for entering others' dialog...
On 17.02.2014 21:13, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 6:17 AM, Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org wrote:
[snip]
Can you surgically remove systemd in the future without reverse
engineering
half of what the LSB would look at the time, or
On 2014-02-17 12:52 PM, Andrew Savchenko birc...@gmail.com wrote:
And this is a very, very bad idea. Looks like you don't know matter at
all: to begin with kdbus protocol is NOT compatible dbus and special
converter daemon will be needed to enable dbus to talk to kdbus. The
whole kdbus
On 17/02/2014 17:29, Stroller wrote:
On Sun, 16 February 2014, at 4:41 pm, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com
wrote:
...
Whatever problems Red Hat are trying to solve in the Red Hat space are
problems that do not affect me, so I do not need Red Hat's solution. As
for Gnome, I have yet
On Mon, 17 Feb 2014 14:52:33 -0500 Tanstaafl wrote:
On 2014-02-17 12:52 PM, Andrew Savchenko birc...@gmail.com wrote:
And this is a very, very bad idea. Looks like you don't know matter at
all: to begin with kdbus protocol is NOT compatible dbus and special
converter daemon will be needed
On Mon, 17 Feb 2014 08:57:46 -0800
Edward M. edwardm.gentoo.j...@live.com wrote:
Sorry for top post using my phone
Ice tea is Java se. Glass server uses
Java EE because EE has added API and
Runtime to build enterprise secure apps.
sorry the link did not help.
Sent from my Windows Phone
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 11:52 AM, Andrew Savchenko birc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, 16 Feb 2014 15:16:36 -0600 Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 2:58 PM, Volker Armin Hemmann
volkerar...@googlemail.com wrote:
Am 16.02.2014 21:08, schrieb Canek Peláez Valdés:
On Sun, Feb 16,
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 12:24 PM, Andrew Savchenko birc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, 17 Feb 2014 11:13:39 -0600 Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
It simply doesn't matter if systemd boils down to one monolithic binary, or
600, if they are tied together in such a way that they can not
*individually*
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 12:28 PM, Yuri K. Shatroff yks-...@yandex.ru wrote:
Sorry for entering others' dialog...
On 17.02.2014 21:13, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 6:17 AM, Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org
wrote:
[snip]
Can you surgically remove systemd in the
On 18 Feb 2014 06:04, Edward M edwardm.gentoo.j...@live.com wrote:
On Mon, 17 Feb 2014 08:57:46 -0800
Edward M. edwardm.gentoo.j...@live.com wrote:
Sorry for top post using my phone
Ice tea is Java se. Glass server uses
Java EE because EE has added API and
Runtime to build enterprise
On Mon, 17 Feb 2014 18:35:34 -0600
Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 11:52 AM, Andrew Savchenko
birc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, 16 Feb 2014 15:16:36 -0600 Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 2:58 PM, Volker Armin Hemmann
On Tue, 18 Feb 2014 07:11:17 +0530
Nilesh Govindrajan m...@nileshgr.com wrote:
No problem. Actually glassfish needs JDK7 as per their docs. So any
JDK7 should work. Java EE is just a specification to be implemented by
application servers.
Yes Java EE extends Java SE platform with add ons,
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 3:53 AM, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
On 17/02/2014 17:29, Stroller wrote:
On Sun, 16 February 2014, at 4:41 pm, Alan McKinnon
alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
...
Whatever problems Red Hat are trying to solve in the Red Hat space are
problems that do
On Mon, 17 Feb 2014 18:41:18 -0800
Edward M edwardm.gentoo.j...@live.com wrote:
On Tue, 18 Feb 2014 07:11:17 +0530
Nilesh Govindrajan m...@nileshgr.com wrote:
No problem. Actually glassfish needs JDK7 as per their docs. So any
JDK7 should work. Java EE is just a specification to be
Hello list!
I'm planning to replace an Active Directory server currently functioning
*only* as an LDAP server, with a dedicated Linux-based LDAP server.
Now, the function of the LDAP server is at the moment:
* Provide the settings database for Axigen email server
* Provide group membership for
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 8:05 PM, Gevisz gev...@gmail.com wrote:
[ snip ]
How can you be sure if something is large enough if, as you say below,
you do not care about probabilities?
By writing correct code?
SysVinit code size is about 10 000 lines of code, OpenRC contains
about 13 000
On 18 February 2014 06:03:02 CET, Pandu Poluan pa...@poluan.info wrote:
Hello list!
I'm planning to replace an Active Directory server currently
functioning
*only* as an LDAP server, with a dedicated Linux-based LDAP server.
Now, the function of the LDAP server is at the moment:
* Provide the
30 matches
Mail list logo
