I'm not a professional, but I'd say that running as few services as
possible contributes to the overall security be reducing the attack
vectors (and Gentoo helps with that by not having that much by default).
I usually opt only for ssh and use certificates rather than passwords...
On Thu,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 21/03/14 17:44, Ján Zahornadský wrote:
Indeed, the smaller the surface area, the smaller the target (the
fewer things running, the fewer things can be exploited).
For an average desktop environment, doing what you're already doing, I
think,
140320 john wrote:
After recently reading about Windigo,
I am quesstioning how good my security is on my Gentoo box.
I am only a desktop user with iptables and clamav installed
and occasionally running chkrootkit.
Would you recommend any other forms of security
-- snort, selinux, hardened
140320 James wrote:
I often go to /usr/portage/target-dir
and browse the packages under a given category,
for example /usr/portage/media-sound .
Rather that looking at the packages one at a time,
It be nice to list all the packages in a (dir) group
and the single line description.
My
Am 20.03.2014 11:24, schrieb Tom Wijsman:
On Thu, 20 Mar 2014 11:39:58 +0400
Gleb Klochkov glebiu...@gmail.com wrote:
Tom, thank you for your answer.
$ dmesg http://bpaste.net/show/187533/
There this can be seen:
[ 18.074574] [drm] Wrong MCH_SSKPD value: 0x16040307
[
On 3/20/2014 5:48 PM, »Q« boxc...@gmx.net wrote:
Why should Gentoo have a default?
Defaults are always a good idea - as long as they are reasonable and
rational.
ISTM the only good reason is that not having a default would make the
documentation a lot more complicated.
Documentation,
On Fri, 21 Mar 2014 06:37:20 -0400
Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org wrote:
On 3/20/2014 5:48 PM, »Q« boxc...@gmx.net wrote:
Why should Gentoo have a default?
Defaults are always a good idea - as long as they are reasonable and
rational.
Depends on how you think about it; one could
On Thu, 20 Mar 2014 17:23:05 -0400
Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org wrote:
On 3/20/2014 4:00 PM, Tom Wijsman tom...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Fri, 21 Feb 2014 09:53:51 +0400
Andrew Savchenko birc...@gmail.com wrote:
OpenRC is default in Gentoo now, and it is my best hope it will be.
Do
On Thu, 20 Mar 2014 17:25:18 -0400
Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org wrote:
On 3/20/2014 4:14 PM, Tom Wijsman tom...@gentoo.org wrote:
Tom - please STOP CC'ing me on these emails.
I am on the list and don't need two copies.
Use 'Reply-To-List' function (or equivalent - or worst case,
On Tue, 18 Feb 2014 19:32:28 +
Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote:
A login daemon should be started by the init system, not be an
integral part of it. What happens when logind no longer fulfils
developers needs, as is the case with ConsoleKit now, how can it be
replaced with an
On Tue, 18 Feb 2014 10:54:55 +0100
J. Roeleveld jo...@antarean.org wrote:
On Sun, February 16, 2014 22:16, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 2:58 PM, Volker Armin Hemmann
volkerar...@googlemail.com wrote:
oh? I can pipe that output into cat or any any daemon I like?
On Wed, 19 Feb 2014 09:50:07 +0100
J. Roeleveld jo...@antarean.org wrote:
It all sounds too much like the MS Windows Event-viewer to me.
Too many events with no usefull logging information (And I am
referring to OS-level messages as to why default services are not
starting)
The MS Windows
On Sun, 16 Feb 2014 23:00:43 +0400
Yuri K. Shatroff yks-...@yandex.ru wrote:
I wonder why all systemd's fancy stuff hasn't yet been integrated
into any existing init system, because of theoretical impossibility
or just practical uselessness?
A lot of it is being integrated in some as we
On Wed, 19 Feb 2014 07:57:06 -0500
Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org wrote:
Getting the Gentoo Council behind this idea, and providing an
officially supported - or maybe a better term is *mandated* - process
whereby systemd proponents can create and then maintain new systemd
versions of any
On 21 March 2014 12:24:04 CET, Tom Wijsman tom...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Tue, 18 Feb 2014 10:54:55 +0100
J. Roeleveld jo...@antarean.org wrote:
On Sun, February 16, 2014 22:16, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 2:58 PM, Volker Armin Hemmann
volkerar...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Fri, 21 Mar 2014 12:50:23 +0100
J. Roeleveld jo...@antarean.org wrote:
Tom,
Please reply to list. No need to include me in the recipient list.
Please filter duplicate mails. No need to tell each other this.
http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
Tom Wijsman wrote:
On Thu, 20 Mar 2014 17:25:18 -0400
Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org wrote:
On 3/20/2014 4:14 PM, Tom Wijsman tom...@gentoo.org wrote:
Tom - please STOP CC'ing me on these emails.
I am on the list and don't need two copies.
Use 'Reply-To-List' function (or equivalent
On Fri, 21 Mar 2014 12:13:28 +0100, Tom Wijsman wrote:
Use 'Reply-To-List' function (or equivalent - or worst case, delete
my direct email manually yourself) in your email program.
Like everyone else, use the 'Filter duplicates' function in your email
program or procmail; these requests
Hello,
Since a few weeks I am using Gentoo Linux.
I have used Debian for something like 12 years and now decided to
switch. So far I really enjoy the learning experience with Gentoo.
Up to know I have it only installed on an old Notebook, to play around
with it.
However I use it way too
On Fri, March 21, 2014 12:59, Tom Wijsman wrote:
On Fri, 21 Mar 2014 12:50:23 +0100
J. Roeleveld jo...@antarean.org wrote:
Tom,
Please reply to list. No need to include me in the recipient list.
Please filter duplicate mails. No need to tell each other this.
I filter on the server, using
On Fri, 21 Mar 2014 07:10:49 -0500
Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
So let's get this straight. You want most everyone on this list to
change what they have to do to remove dups caused by you, instead of
you changing what you do to fix the problem?
Everyone else is okay with it, as only one
On Fri, 21 Mar 2014 12:27:09 +
Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote:
On Fri, 21 Mar 2014 12:13:28 +0100, Tom Wijsman wrote:
Use 'Reply-To-List' function (or equivalent - or worst case,
delete my direct email manually yourself) in your email program.
Like everyone else, use
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 8:49 AM, Tom Wijsman tom...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Fri, 21 Mar 2014 12:27:09 +
Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote:
On Fri, 21 Mar 2014 12:13:28 +0100, Tom Wijsman wrote:
Use 'Reply-To-List' function (or equivalent - or worst case,
delete my direct email
On Fri, 21 Mar 2014 13:41:54 +0100
J. Roeleveld jo...@antarean.org wrote:
On Fri, March 21, 2014 12:59, Tom Wijsman wrote:
On Fri, 21 Mar 2014 12:50:23 +0100
J. Roeleveld jo...@antarean.org wrote:
Tom,
Please reply to list. No need to include me in the recipient list.
Please
On Fri, 21 Mar 2014 09:13:27 -0400
Poison BL. poiso...@gmail.com wrote:
fighting on the topic of 'proper use of mailing lists' when you're
standing in stark contrast to the configuration of the mailing list
you're using to do it,
Which fight? It is a short notice as to why it is being done,
On Thu, 27 Feb 2014 14:53:22 -0300
Facundo Curti facu.cu...@gmail.com wrote:
Debian, and Ubuntu are desktop platforms. Yes they are widely used
in production server environments (the slow
ones that is) however, our last experience with Debian squeeze as a
whole (ie, source tree,
On Sun, 23 Feb 2014 11:54:43 +
Alan Mackenzie a...@muc.de wrote:
On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 01:32:36AM +0100, waben...@gmail.com wrote:
Am Samstag, 22.02.2014 um 21:15
What do I have to do to get this thing emerged?
Thanks!
Sometimes it is helpful to increase the backtrack
On Sat, 22 Feb 2014 21:15:05 +
Alan Mackenzie a...@muc.de wrote:
(media-libs/libpng-1.6.8::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge)
pulled in by (no parents that aren't satisfied by other packages in
this slot)
Whenever you see this, (no parents that ...), you'll want to be aware
that there
On Sun, 23 Feb 2014 15:53:44 +0100
Frank Steinmetzger war...@gmx.de wrote:
I'm observing on this olde Centrino laptop that emerges take much,
much longer for certain packages than they did in the past.
There are a lot more factors that could come into play here; degrading
hardware, worse
On Mon, 24 Feb 2014 03:11:25 +0100
eroen er...@falcon.eroen.eu wrote:
One would hope (mostly for their image's sake) the gnome team does
not remove gnome-settings-daemon-2 until at least one of
cinnamon-settings-daemon and mate-settings-daemon are included in
gentoo proper.
+ 05 Mar 2014;
On Fri, March 21, 2014 14:20, Tom Wijsman wrote:
On Fri, 21 Mar 2014 13:41:54 +0100
J. Roeleveld jo...@antarean.org wrote:
On Fri, March 21, 2014 12:59, Tom Wijsman wrote:
On Fri, 21 Mar 2014 12:50:23 +0100
J. Roeleveld jo...@antarean.org wrote:
Tom,
Please reply to list. No need
On Fri, 21 Mar 2014 15:06:12 +0100
J. Roeleveld jo...@antarean.org wrote:
Is that one included in the Cyrus ebuild?
In Cyrus it is an actual feature, see the (first) FAQ[1] entry about
Duplicate Delivery Surpression; in imapd.conf you can do
duplicatesuppression: 1
to enable this. It
On Tue, 4 Mar 2014 07:47:47 +0530
Nilesh Govindrajan m...@nileshgr.com wrote:
Works perfectly. Looks like I've to downgrade to geek sources 3.13.4
in this case.
Remember some thread about this on LKML; think this would have been
fixed by now, does this still happen on more recent versions?
If
On Fri, 7 Mar 2014 18:43:27 +0800
microcai micro...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
I'm having trouble compiling glibc. No matter I tried with binutils
2.23 2.24. or - live version, I got ld internal error in
x86_64_relocation . And the same error repeated with glibc-2.18 and
On 21-Mar-2014 9:12 pm, Tom Wijsman tom...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Tue, 4 Mar 2014 07:47:47 +0530
Nilesh Govindrajan m...@nileshgr.com wrote:
Works perfectly. Looks like I've to downgrade to geek sources 3.13.4
in this case.
Remember some thread about this on LKML; think this would have
On Sat, 8 Mar 2014 10:12:13 -0500
Todd Goodman t...@bonedaddy.net wrote:
When you ask it to emerge dev-lang/python-exec it tries to emerge for
all slots (I'm not sure, someone please correct me if that's not
what's happening.)
Consider what happened when you did `sys-kernel/gentoo-sources` in
J. Roeleveld wrote:
I filter on the server, using SIEVE-scripts. Please provide the
correct syntax I need to do this. You are the only one causing
duplicate emails, all others on this list do NOT cause duplicate
emails. This means the cause is on your side and the solution should
then also be
Tom Wijsman wrote:
On Fri, 21 Mar 2014 07:10:49 -0500
Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
So let's get this straight. You want most everyone on this list to
change what they have to do to remove dups caused by you, instead of
you changing what you do to fix the problem?
Everyone else is okay
On 3/21/2014 7:13 AM, Tom Wijsman tom...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Thu, 20 Mar 2014 17:25:18 -0400
Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org wrote:
On 3/20/2014 4:14 PM, Tom Wijsman tom...@gentoo.org wrote:
Tom - please STOP CC'ing me on these emails.
I am on the list and don't need two copies.
Use
Poison BL. wrote:
Just my 2c as one of the others who doesn't generally reply to what,
at face value, seemed an awful lot more combative/trolling of a tone
than actually useful (disregard != compliance on the internet),
fighting on the topic of 'proper use of mailing lists' when you're
Since the last kernel upgrade the motherboard beep of my system has gone
silent.
The notebook is a HP Compaq 6710b and with an Intel 82801H Chipset (see
attached lscpi -k)
Module for my sound card is running and SND_HDA_INPUT_BEEP is activated
in kernel config. Am I missing something else?
Tanstaafl wrote:
On 3/21/2014 7:13 AM, Tom Wijsman tom...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Thu, 20 Mar 2014 17:25:18 -0400
Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org wrote:
On 3/20/2014 4:14 PM, Tom Wijsman tom...@gentoo.org wrote:
Tom - please STOP CC'ing me on these emails.
I am on the list and don't need
On Fri, 21 Mar 2014 12:41:03 -0500
Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
FYI. Most people don't say anything, they just blacklist you. After
that, you don't exist to them.
Yes, that's up to those few; it could happen, but most respond instead.
To my knowledge, the only emails I have not got
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014, at 18:51, null_ptr wrote:
Module for my sound card is running and SND_HDA_INPUT_BEEP is activated
in kernel config. Am I missing something else?
Perhaps you need CONFIG_INPUT_PCSPKR.
On 21/03/14 19:54, Francesco Turco wrote:
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014, at 18:51, null_ptr wrote:
Module for my sound card is running and SND_HDA_INPUT_BEEP is activated
in kernel config. Am I missing something else?
Perhaps you need CONFIG_INPUT_PCSPKR.
I tried building with that and it didn't fix
On 21/03/2014 20:23, Dale wrote:
Tanstaafl wrote:
On 3/21/2014 7:13 AM, Tom Wijsman tom...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Thu, 20 Mar 2014 17:25:18 -0400
Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org wrote:
On 3/20/2014 4:14 PM, Tom Wijsman tom...@gentoo.org wrote:
Tom - please STOP CC'ing me on these emails.
I can't think of the name of the module, pcspkr IIRC or some such, but it
prolly isn't loaded. Modprobe can tell you if it's available load it.
On Mar 21, 2014 12:41 PM, Dat G rhan...@gmx.de wrote:
On 21/03/14 19:54, Francesco Turco wrote:
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014, at 18:51, null_ptr wrote:
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 02:29:48PM +0100, Tom Wijsman wrote
http://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Procmail
The mailing list etiquette requires people to CC all the people
involved in a particular thread in replies to the mailing list, in case
any of them is not subscribed.
How does one send email
On 21/03/2014 23:57, Walter Dnes wrote:
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 02:29:48PM +0100, Tom Wijsman wrote
http://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Procmail
The mailing list etiquette requires people to CC all the people
involved in a particular thread in replies to the mailing list, in case
any of them is
On Fri, 21 Mar 2014 17:57:07 -0400
Walter Dnes waltd...@waltdnes.org wrote:
How does one send email to *THIS* list, without being subscribed in
the first place?
You can do that on sites like GMANE; similarly, given a message ID,
you can request that specific from the mailing list daemon to
On Sat, 22 Mar 2014 00:34:55 +0200
Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
2. A discussion forum. For these you do munge Reply-To: to be the list
so all discussion happens on-list and is visible to all
gentoo-user has always been the latter and all discussion always takes
place
Alan McKinnon wrote:
Judging by replies so far, I'd guess not many at all. You can't
possibly know how many will or will not plonk someone. In the meantime
Dale, I think you are projecting. Chill out brother, chill out. Plenty
stuff in the world more deserving of attention than this.
I fixed
Tom Wijsman wrote:
On Fri, 21 Mar 2014 12:41:03 -0500
Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
FYI. Most people don't say anything, they just blacklist you. After
that, you don't exist to them.
Yes, that's up to those few; it could happen, but most respond instead.
I just read the last message
On 21/03/14 14:41, Lee wrote:
I can't think of the name of the module, pcspkr IIRC or some such, but it
prolly isn't loaded. Modprobe can tell you if it's available load it.
On Mar 21, 2014 12:41 PM, Dat G rhan...@gmx.de wrote:
On 21/03/14 19:54, Francesco Turco wrote:
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014,
On Fri, 21 Mar 2014 18:51:22 +0100
null_ptr rhan...@gmx.de wrote:
Since the last kernel upgrade
Which kernel package? From which version to which version?
the motherboard beep of my system has gone silent.
Can you diff the dmesg as well as `lsmod` output before and after?
Module for my
Hi,
Since I don't have a laptop, I'm thinking of installing Gentoo on my
USB 3 pen drive. I'll use binpkgs from my desktop so that pen drive
lives long.
Has anybody tried Samsung's F2FS? I heard it performs better than the
traditional ext4/xfs/etc on flash drives.
Also the pen drive will be
56 matches
Mail list logo
