On Sat, 03 Feb 2007 09:26:22 +0300, Richard Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi - After a last emerge --sync I've been having trouble accessing the
internet. My network interface comes up OK. I receive an address for the
DHCP server (i.e. eth1 received address 192.168.0.7/24) and I can see
On Tue, 06 Feb 2007 10:27:01 +0300, Alan McKinnon
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does the host CPU make a difference? I thought it was all emulated? I
tried to recompile the kernel with the generic '386 CPU settings and
removed all power mgmt etc, and the same issue happens.
The host CPU
On Sun, 11 Feb 2007 11:57:19 +0300, William Kenworthy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Heat (dust bunnies/blocked fans/filters ...)
bad memory
Bad memory or bad motherboard. This is less likely, but also happens (saw
that Thursday). Ideally, switch memory with another similar PC and see
what
On Mon, 12 Feb 2007 19:46:42 +0300, Hemmann, Volker Armin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you can read german (or if you know someone who is able to translate
it for
you):
http://hardware.thgweb.de/2007/01/15/stresstest_netzteile_2007/index.html
Nice link, thanks. Re reading German:
1.
On Wed, 14 Feb 2007 22:47:45 +0300, Grant Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All of my gentoo systems have both gcc 3.4 and 4.1 but still
use 3.4 for everything except packages that just won't build
with gcc 3.4.
I'm curious what other people are doing. Have most people
switched over to 4.1 as
On Fri, 23 Feb 2007 03:51:20 +0300, Neil Bothwick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Thu, 22 Feb 2007 15:34:45 -0800, Grant wrote:
It occurred to me this morning that a hacker could have gained access
to my system via the vmware guest OS (XP) and then deleted the
contents of vmware/ to cover his
On Fri, 23 Feb 2007 20:57:25 +0300, Grant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It occurred to me this morning that a hacker could have gained access
to my system via the vmware guest OS (XP) and then deleted the
contents of vmware/ to cover his tracks. Does that sound like a
possibility?
Not unless
On Thu, 15 Mar 2007 14:46:47 +0300, Nelson, David (ED, PARD)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No. And the hardware is not new, nor is this a fresh install. I just
don't know what changed...
Try a different keyboard? Just in case?
Try LILO.
--
Andrei Gerasimenko
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org
On Sun, 01 Apr 2007 18:07:15 +0400, Jeff Rollin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi list
I like the new look of the website, but how on Earth does anyone make any
sense of the links? Purple on black is a really bad idea, and that's from
someone who doesn't have any accessibility issues with
On Sun, 01 Apr 2007 19:25:24 +0400, Jeff Rollin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
In the last episode, Andrey Gerasimenko wrote:
AG
AG Do you mean www.gentoo.org? If yes:
AG
AG IMHO this should not be filed as a bug. The colors all over the page
are
AG consistent and the links, which
On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 11:32:45 +0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Apr 04, 2007 at 07:36:49AM +0200, Bo ?rsted Andresen wrote:
Weren't you talking about portage? In that case you should obviously
file it
against portage.. But yeah, any app that has a --nocolor equivalent that
doesn't work
On Mon, 09 Apr 2007 05:48:07 +0400, maxim wexler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi group,
I note two schools of thought on the best CFLAGS for
the Pentium III processor.
One suggests using -O3 -pipe, the other, -O2 without
the pipe.
How much difference does this make? Is the extra level
of
On Mon, 16 Apr 2007 22:10:27 +0400, Ryan Sims [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
As has been said, the installation CD does not need to be specifically
a Gentoo cd, although it seems worth repeating that it _does_ have to
support the same architecture. ...
On Tue, 17 Apr 2007 09:50:23 +0400, Dale [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andrey Gerasimenko wrote:
I agree that the installation CD does not need to be specifically a
Gentoo cd, but I believe that it should be always possible to use it
for installation, even when workarounds are available. The only
On Tue, 17 Apr 2007 14:08:49 +0400, Neil Bothwick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Tue, 17 Apr 2007 13:26:23 +0400, Andrey Gerasimenko wrote:
I do not see how it is hard to create a minimal installation CD image
every time new hardware support is added into the kernel,
Then do it. Open source
On Wed, 18 Apr 2007 00:11:21 +0400, Neil Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andrey Gerasimenko wrote:
I do not see how it is hard to create a minimal installation CD image
every time new hardware support is added into the kernel, or new gcc
version goes stable, or new portage version goes
On Fri, 11 May 2007 01:36:03 +0400, Dan Farrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 10 May 2007 11:34:46 +0100
Neil Bothwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 10 May 2007 12:11:34 +0200, Benno Schulenberg wrote:
No idea, but I tried it when I encountered that page and portage
operations were
On Sat, 19 May 2007 07:00:58 +0400, Kent Fredric [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
...
Imo, the cyclic dep problem could be solved as thus,
A depends B
B depends C||A
Where C is a minimalist subset of A required for building B, which is
only depended on if A is not present.
A is also a
On Tue, 12 Dec 2006 18:38:07 +0300, Uwe Thiem [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi folks,
this is for English native speakers (British English, American English
and
colonial English alike).
I was looking up something in my Oxford dictionary. First, I had to make
sure
how they indicate irregular
On Thu, 14 Dec 2006 07:29:34 +0300, Dale [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ryan Sims wrote:
)
That paste looks HTML. Can someone confirm that it is sending as text
only? I have Seamonkey set up to send text only to this list.
This is a multi-part message in MIME format, that is, onepart is plain
On Mon, 18 Dec 2006 20:27:20 +0300, Hemmann, Volker Armin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Monday 18 December 2006 15:47, Grant wrote:
I've caught a whiff or two lately that Gentoo is declining in
popularity amongst users and developers. Is it all in my head? I
personally still love Gentoo.
On Wed, 20 Dec 2006 05:23:25 +0300, Colleen Beamer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I, for one, would be devastated without Gentoo!
I looked deep into myself and found that possibly it is fear that drives
this thread. Am I not the only one with the impresion that for the last 10
On Wed, 20 Dec 2006 20:39:46 +0300, Bo Ørsted Andresen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wednesday 20 December 2006 18:16, Mark Knecht wrote:
[SNIP]
I understand that every package is out there in some repository on the
web. I think Neil has pointed me toward it once or twice at least. The
problem
On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 02:03:26 +0300, Bryan Østergaard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Wed, Dec 20, 2006 at 12:16:04PM +0300, Andrey Gerasimenko wrote:
Is the non-profit organization side of Gentoo healthy? My brief Google
session does not reveal anything that suggests it is not, but if
somebody
On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 12:25:01 +0300, Neil Bothwick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Files are removed from the mirrors two weeks after the last ebuild using
them is removed from the tree, so if you sync every two weeks you should
never suffer from missing source files (apart fro restricted ebuilds).
On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 12:52:53 +0300, Bo Ørsted Andresen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 21 December 2006 10:43, Andrey Gerasimenko wrote:
Files are removed from the mirrors two weeks after the last ebuild
using
them is removed from the tree, so if you sync every two weeks you
should
On Mon, 25 Dec 2006 04:52:55 +0300, Mike Myers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
In Gentoo, the system is updated while you are
using it.
This causes us users to modify whatever we're running to suit all these
changes.
As far as I know, Gentoo releases a Reference Platform
On Mon, 25 Dec 2006 11:46:23 +0300, Mike Myers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I understand what you say, but I'm not sure I got my point across very
well. Let's say I have a server that has various things installed like
apache with the 2.0 branch, mysql with the 4.0 branch, and PHP with
the
On Mon, 01 Jan 2007 02:29:12 +0300, Mike Myers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I'm sure others will disagree, but I really think if Gentoo is going to
become a cornerstone in the desktop's replacement (like for thin clients)
then there should probably be an option for a binary 'version' of
On Wed, 03 Jan 2007 10:55:50 +0300, Chuanwen Wu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oh,God!
I can't start my machine with the livecd anymore even I have burned
another livecd with livecd-i686-installer-2006.1.iso.
The error is still all the same:coldpluging pci devices,which
appears at 68%'s progress.
Looking at the Portage tree, I see that some packages are kept ~x86 for
long time without any bugs referenced in the changelog or Bugzilla. How
are they being made stable (or where in the docs is the process described)?
--
Andrei Gerasimenko
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
On Fri, 05 Jan 2007 11:49:30 +0300, Robert Cernansky [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Thu, 04 Jan 2007 13:49:48 -0700 Steve Dibb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andrey Gerasimenko wrote:
Looking at the Portage tree, I see that some packages are kept ~x86
for long time without any bugs referenced
On Sat, 06 Jan 2007 04:24:58 +0300, David Relson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 05 Jan 2007 17:23:51 -0700
Steve Dibb wrote:
I've been reading this thread as well as the earlier (July) threads
(from gmane) and notice that everyone is discussing 30 days,
automatic, and stabilization bugs.
On Wed, 10 Jan 2007 21:43:26 +0300, Jorge Almeida
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm about to switch from cable to ADSL anytime soon, and I'm trying to
prepare the computer for the big change, given that there will be a time
gap without internet access and that I can't expect any support
whatsoever
On Fri, 19 Jan 2007 12:37:27 +0300, qfpvajdy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I would like to convince my boss and my collegues to use Gentoo
GNU/Linux at the company office for the desktop system (and maybe one
day also for servers).
Currently everybody uses its own Linux/Unix system, but
On Sun, 21 Jan 2007 18:45:01 +0300, John covici [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I am having problems setting the domain name of a new gentoo
installation. I looked at /etc/conf.d/net.examples and tried what
seemed to me what they were looking for such as
DNS_LO=domain name
The host name works,
On Fri, 26 Jan 2007 21:12:41 +0300, Bo Ørsted Andresen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Whether you should move or not I'll leave up to you. Following
ciaranm.org or
even planetpaludis.org should allow you to decide for yourself... Just
make
sure to read the docs at paludis.org if you want to try
On Mon, 29 Jan 2007 23:46:56 +0300, Vlad Dogaru [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
after some suggestions from the list I finally emerged KDE to give it
another try. Even with 256 MiB of RAM, it works quite acceptably, save
for the startup time. However, I notice it has installed all sorts of
38 matches
Mail list logo
