On Fri, 2008-02-15 at 17:29 +0100, Alex Schuster wrote:
Neil Bothwick writes:
On Fri, 15 Feb 2008 10:14:22 +0930, Iain Buchanan wrote:
The cruelty is actually worse: the machines that will benefit most
from an OOo compile from source, are those old, low memory, asthmatic
boxen,
On Fri, 15 Feb 2008 10:14:22 +0930, Iain Buchanan wrote:
The cruelty is actually worse: the machines that will benefit most
from an OOo compile from source, are those old, low memory, asthmatic
boxen, that take two days to complete the emerge! I am tempted to
start cross-compiling.
Neil Bothwick writes:
On Fri, 15 Feb 2008 10:14:22 +0930, Iain Buchanan wrote:
The cruelty is actually worse: the machines that will benefit most
from an OOo compile from source, are those old, low memory, asthmatic
boxen, that take two days to complete the emerge! I am tempted to
On Thursday 14 February 2008, Iain Buchanan wrote:
On Thu, 2008-02-14 at 01:20 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
Ahem. 'scuse me:
I have 5.5G for /var/tmp
Wanna guess why?
well, this is Gentoo, so compile X where X=any damn large enough
package probably still fits :) Openoffice for
On Thursday 14 February 2008, Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Thursday 14 February 2008, Iain Buchanan wrote:
On Thu, 2008-02-14 at 01:20 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
Ahem. 'scuse me:
I have 5.5G for /var/tmp
Wanna guess why?
well, this is Gentoo, so compile X where X=any damn large
sorry to hijack the thread even further...
On Thu, 2008-02-14 at 23:04 +, Mick wrote:
On Thursday 14 February 2008, Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Thursday 14 February 2008, Iain Buchanan wrote:
On Thu, 2008-02-14 at 01:20 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
Ahem. 'scuse me:
I have 5.5G
On Wednesday 13 February 2008, James wrote:
James R. Campbell jamesc at reliant-data.com writes:
What processes have the most on cpu time as reported by a 'ps ax' ?
not certain what your are asking. Here is the result of ps ax:
He probably meant 'ps axu'
--
Alan McKinnon
alan dot mckinnon
On Tuesday 12 February 2008, James wrote:
Alan McKinnon alan.mckinnon at gmail.com writes:
One of the workstations (amd64 2gig ram) has a load that never
drops below 1.0, as seen by top. Looking at a ps nothing stands
out. I did notice that 'X' is at the top of the list, even when
the
how about cron jobs like updatedb? Is there any disk activity?
--
Iain Buchanan iaindb at netspace dot net dot au
tigah_- i have 4gb for /tmp
Knghtbrd What do you do with 4G /tmp? Compile X?
tigah_- yes
--
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
On Thursday 14 February 2008, Iain Buchanan wrote:
how about cron jobs like updatedb? Is there any disk activity?
--
Iain Buchanan iaindb at netspace dot net dot au
tigah_- i have 4gb for /tmp
Knghtbrd What do you do with 4G /tmp? Compile X?
tigah_- yes
Ahem. 'scuse me:
I have 5.5G for
On Thu, 2008-02-14 at 01:20 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Thursday 14 February 2008, Iain Buchanan wrote:
how about cron jobs like updatedb? Is there any disk activity?
--
Iain Buchanan iaindb at netspace dot net dot au
tigah_- i have 4gb for /tmp
Knghtbrd What do you do with 4G
Any ideas?
No.But do you also see this without X running, without most daemons running,
in single user mode...?
12 matches
Mail list logo
