Re: [gentoo-user] Re: modules built post kernel install (on the fly)

2006-03-05 Thread Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
On Saturday 04 March 2006 10:07, Masood Ahmed [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote about 'Re: [gentoo-user] Re: modules built post kernel install (on the fly)': Harry Putnam wrote: Masood Ahmed [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Thanks Masood, for the pointers.. I have a question about your sig. Do you get

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: modules built post kernel install (on the fly)

2006-03-04 Thread Masood Ahmed
Peter wrote: On Sat, 04 Mar 2006 09:15:04 -0600, Harry Putnam wrote: Is this possible: Compile a module by itself (not during kernel compile) and insert that module into a running kernel. Yes. cd /usr/src/linux make menuconfig or make xconfig choose the module option you

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: modules built post kernel install (on the fly)

2006-03-04 Thread Masood Ahmed
Harry Putnam wrote: Masood Ahmed [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: [...] Thanks Masood, for the pointers.. I have a question about your sig. () Do you get that info from a single command or several? The answer is several, for kernel version i did 'uname -r' for gcc-version i did 'gcc -v'

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: modules built post kernel install (on the fly)

2006-03-04 Thread Brett I. Holcomb
Builtin means it's built into the kernel - the * indicates that. On Saturday March 4 2006 23:03, Harry Putnam wrote: Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: That is correct. Unless you alter bzImage, modprobe newmodule should work just fine. If your new module is built in, you will need to reload

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: modules built post kernel install (on the fly)

2006-03-04 Thread Holly Bostick
Harry Putnam schreef: Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: That is correct. Unless you alter bzImage, modprobe newmodule should work just fine. If your new module is built in, you will need to reload the kernel (reboot). Ok, this is confusing to me... What do you mean by `built in'. I'm

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: modules built post kernel install (on the fly)

2006-03-04 Thread Ryan Tandy
Harry Putnam wrote: I guess I sort of thought there was some trick way to just compile a module and not do all the linking and grinding of `make' against the whole tree. Unless you've done 'make clean' previously, 'make' will only compile required files based on changes you've made to your