Mark David Dumlao wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 1:00 AM Andrew Savchenko wrote:
>> On Sun, 10 Feb 2019 10:27:32 -0600 Dale wrote:
>>> My password manager does that already. The password I was trying to
>>> come up with was the master password which I must easily remember, be
>>> secure and be
On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 1:00 AM Andrew Savchenko wrote:
>
> On Sun, 10 Feb 2019 10:27:32 -0600 Dale wrote:
> > My password manager does that already. The password I was trying to
> > come up with was the master password which I must easily remember, be
> > secure and be easy to type. The other
On Sun, 10 Feb 2019 10:27:32 -0600 Dale wrote:
> Andrew Savchenko wrote:
> > On Sun, 3 Feb 2019 23:47:35 -0600 Dale wrote:
> >> Howdy,
> >>
> >> Some may recall me mentioning using LastPass to manage my passwords.
> >> Obviously, it can generate very strong passwords that are different for
> >>
Andrew Savchenko wrote:
> On Sun, 3 Feb 2019 23:47:35 -0600 Dale wrote:
>> Howdy,
>>
>> Some may recall me mentioning using LastPass to manage my passwords.
>> Obviously, it can generate very strong passwords that are different for
>> each site. It can also remember them as well which makes
On Sun, 3 Feb 2019 23:47:35 -0600 Dale wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> Some may recall me mentioning using LastPass to manage my passwords.
> Obviously, it can generate very strong passwords that are different for
> each site. It can also remember them as well which makes things more
> secure than using
Tanstaafl wrote:
> On 2/4/2019, 8:10:57 PM, Dale wrote:
>> Tanstaafl wrote:
>>> I've been using a little Firefox Addon called Passwordmaker for many,
>>> many years, and despite all of its warts, I've been loathe to give it
>>> up, even though it will never be upgraded to work as a WebExtension.
On 2/4/2019, 8:10:57 PM, Dale wrote:
> Tanstaafl wrote:
>> I've been using a little Firefox Addon called Passwordmaker for many,
>> many years, and despite all of its warts, I've been loathe to give it
>> up, even though it will never be upgraded to work as a WebExtension.
>>
>> 2 things I loved
Mick wrote:
> On Tuesday, 5 February 2019 10:13:44 GMT Dale wrote:
>
>> After seeing your reply, I realize I just type the command and it
>> prompts me for a password. I ctrl c to exit. Well, ain't that
>> something? You can stop laughing now. ;-)
>>
>> It seems to think helloworld and
On Tuesday, 5 February 2019 10:13:44 GMT Dale wrote:
> After seeing your reply, I realize I just type the command and it
> prompts me for a password. I ctrl c to exit. Well, ain't that
> something? You can stop laughing now. ;-)
>
> It seems to think helloworld and reallysecurepassword is
Michael Schwartzkopff wrote:
> Am 05.02.19 um 10:55 schrieb Mick:
>> On Tuesday, 5 February 2019 06:48:53 GMT Dale wrote:
>>
>>> Sort of picking a random message to reply to here. Someone sent a reply
>>> off list about checking passwords on my system with tools available.
>>> They also mentioned
Mick wrote:
> On Tuesday, 5 February 2019 06:48:53 GMT Dale wrote:
>
>> Sort of picking a random message to reply to here. Someone sent a reply
>> off list about checking passwords on my system with tools available.
>> They also mentioned not trusting strength meters which I can get since
>> they
Am 05.02.19 um 10:55 schrieb Mick:
> On Tuesday, 5 February 2019 06:48:53 GMT Dale wrote:
>
>> Sort of picking a random message to reply to here. Someone sent a reply
>> off list about checking passwords on my system with tools available.
>> They also mentioned not trusting strength meters which
On Tuesday, 5 February 2019 06:48:53 GMT Dale wrote:
> Sort of picking a random message to reply to here. Someone sent a reply
> off list about checking passwords on my system with tools available.
> They also mentioned not trusting strength meters which I can get since
> they pass some obvious
Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Mon, 04 Feb 2019 11:17:13 +, Mick wrote:
>
>>> https://xkcd.com/936/
>> Not strictly true ... the crackers would probably use rainbow tables
>> attacks first. Also, it isn't fair to compare an 11 character passwd
>> against a 25 character passwd. For the *same*
Tanstaafl wrote:
> On 2/4/2019, 12:47:35 AM, Dale wrote:
>> Thing is, with today's computing power, it really isn't anymore.
>> While no one could just guess it, it could be cracked/hacked I'm
>> sure. I need to come up with a new one that meets the requirements I
>> just mentioned. Strong,
Hi Dale,
On Sun, Feb 03, 2019 at 11:47:35PM -0600 , Dale wrote:
> How do you, especially those who admin systems that are always being
> hacked at, generate strong passwords that meet the above?
I have a script for generating passwords the way I like (basically diceware on
bash).
Something
On 2/4/2019, 12:47:35 AM, Dale wrote:
> Thing is, with today's computing power, it really isn't anymore.
> While no one could just guess it, it could be cracked/hacked I'm
> sure. I need to come up with a new one that meets the requirements I
> just mentioned. Strong, easy to remember, easy to
On Sun, 3 Feb 2019 23:47:35 -0600
Dale wrote:
> Howdy,
>
[...snip...]
>
> How do you, especially those who admin systems that are always being
> hacked at, generate strong passwords that meet the above? I've
> googled and found some ideas but if I use the same method, well, how
> many others
On Sun, 2019-02-03 at 23:47 -0600, Dale wrote:
>
>
> How do you, especially those who admin systems that are always being
> hacked at, generate strong passwords that meet the above? I've
> googled
> and found some ideas but if I use the same method, well, how many
> others
> are using that
On Mon, Feb 4, 2019 at 8:21 AM Neil Bothwick wrote:
>
> On Mon, 04 Feb 2019 11:17:13 +, Mick wrote:
>
> > > https://xkcd.com/936/
> >
> > Not strictly true ... the crackers would probably use rainbow tables
> > attacks first. Also, it isn't fair to compare an 11 character passwd
> > against
On Mon, 04 Feb 2019 11:17:13 +, Mick wrote:
> > https://xkcd.com/936/
>
> Not strictly true ... the crackers would probably use rainbow tables
> attacks first. Also, it isn't fair to compare an 11 character passwd
> against a 25 character passwd. For the *same* number of characters
>
On Monday, 4 February 2019 10:37:03 GMT Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Mon, 04 Feb 2019 10:24:27 +, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> > > How do you, especially those who admin systems that are always being
> > > hacked at, generate strong passwords that meet the above? I've
> > > googled and found some
On Mon, 04 Feb 2019 10:24:27 +, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> > How do you, especially those who admin systems that are always being
> > hacked at, generate strong passwords that meet the above? I've
> > googled and found some ideas but if I use the same method, well, how
> > many others are using
On Monday, 4 February 2019 05:47:35 GMT Dale wrote:
> How do you, especially those who admin systems that are always being
> hacked at, generate strong passwords that meet the above? I've googled
> and found some ideas but if I use the same method, well, how many others
> are using that same
24 matches
Mail list logo
