On 2013-08-28 7:24 AM, Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote:
On Wed, 28 Aug 2013 07:04:39 -0400, Tanstaafl wrote:
So... is 2.2 *ever* going to go stable???
Give it a chance! It's only just come out of rc. Until recently it
wasn't even available in testing without umasking.
Ok, sorry, I
On Tue, 27 Aug 2013 17:27:30 -0400, gottl...@nyu.edu wrote:
Am I correct in believing that when I upgrade to 2.2.1, all the commands
from 2.1.x.y will continue to work? I know that several readers have
used 2.2 for years with success.
The commands will, but there may be better alternatives
On 2013-08-27 5:27 PM, gottl...@nyu.edu gottl...@nyu.edu wrote:
I was away for two weeks. I just resynced and see that 2.2.1 is now in
testing (and my current version 2.1.13.1 is not in the tree).
Am I correct in believing that when I upgrade to 2.2.1, all the commands
from 2.1.x.y will
On 28/08/2013 13:04, Tanstaafl wrote:
On 2013-08-27 5:27 PM, gottl...@nyu.edu gottl...@nyu.edu wrote:
I was away for two weeks. I just resynced and see that 2.2.1 is now in
testing (and my current version 2.1.13.1 is not in the tree).
Am I correct in believing that when I upgrade to 2.2.1,
On Wed, 28 Aug 2013 07:04:39 -0400, Tanstaafl wrote:
So... is 2.2 *ever* going to go stable???
Give it a chance! It's only just come out of rc. Until recently it
wasn't even available in testing without umasking.
--
Neil Bothwick
Does fuzzy logic tickle?
signature.asc
Description: PGP
gottl...@nyu.edu wrote:
I was away for two weeks. I just resynced and see that 2.2.1 is now in
testing (and my current version 2.1.13.1 is not in the tree).
Am I correct in believing that when I upgrade to 2.2.1, all the commands
from 2.1.x.y will continue to work? I know that several
On Tue, Aug 27 2013, Dale wrote:
gottl...@nyu.edu wrote:
I was away for two weeks. I just resynced and see that 2.2.1 is now in
testing (and my current version 2.1.13.1 is not in the tree).
Am I correct in believing that when I upgrade to 2.2.1, all the commands
from 2.1.x.y will continue
On 24/07/2013 12:00, Pavel Volkov wrote:
What is the status or portage 2.2?
It takes so long to get out of alpha. Has anyone here had any serious
problems with it? I've been using it for a a few years without any
accidents. Just wondering if I should be prepared for the worst.
I also remember
On 24/07/13 at 02:00pm, Pavel Volkov wrote:
It initially suported set arithmetic (you could writes expressions like
@set1+@set2/@set3), I wonder why it was dropped :)
Wow thats intresting. What could the / operator possibly do in the case
of sets?
--
- Yohan Pereira
The difference between a
On Wed, 24 Jul 2013 14:00:54 +0400, Pavel Volkov wrote:
It initially suported set arithmetic (you could writes expressions like
@set1+@set2/@set3), I wonder why it was dropped :)
What does that mean? set1 and one of set2 or set 3? Or both set1 and set2
or set3 only? I'm not sure how this would
On 24/07/2013 12:17, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Wed, 24 Jul 2013 14:00:54 +0400, Pavel Volkov wrote:
It initially suported set arithmetic (you could writes expressions like
@set1+@set2/@set3), I wonder why it was dropped :)
What does that mean? set1 and one of set2 or set 3? Or both set1 and
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 2:13 PM, Yohan Pereira yohan.pere...@gmail.comwrote:
On 24/07/13 at 02:00pm, Pavel Volkov wrote:
It initially suported set arithmetic (you could writes expressions like
@set1+@set2/@set3), I wonder why it was dropped :)
Wow thats intresting. What could the /
On 24/07/2013 12:52, Pavel Volkov wrote:
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 2:13 PM, Yohan Pereira yohan.pere...@gmail.com
mailto:yohan.pere...@gmail.com wrote:
On 24/07/13 at 02:00pm, Pavel Volkov wrote:
It initially suported set arithmetic (you could writes expressions
like
On Wed, 24 Jul 2013 12:46:59 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
What does that mean? set1 and one of set2 or set 3? Or both set1 and
set2 or set3 only? I'm not sure how this would be useful but I can
certainly see how it would cause confusion and problems, but I hadn't
heard if it before.
On 24/07/2013 15:20, Neil Bothwick wrote:
However, kmail sucks and akonadi sucks moar, so define for yourself
@suckykde
kdepim-meta
And add to your world sets:
@kde+@kdedev/@suckykde
I see, what about operator precedence, is that equivalent to
(@kde+@kdedev)/@kdesuckykde
On 07/24/2013 09:27 AM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
I think it's the former. But I've been known to be wrong on things
(lately, more often than not...)
Just looked on The Google, and there's no consensus I can find. Best
advice seems to be that union and difference are equal precedence so the
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 12:46:59PM +0200, Penguin Lover Alan McKinnon squawked:
@set1+@set2/@set3 reduces to:
all the elements of set1 and set2 without the elements that are in set3
(/ is difference).
Speaking as a mathematician (and A. Gottlieb will agree with me), I
would be rather
On Wed, Jul 24 2013, Willie WY Wong wrote:
Speaking as a mathematician (and A. Gottlieb will agree with me), I
would be rather annoyed that they chose (if this is not a misquote
from the original proposed documentation) to use '/' for set
difference instead of '\' as it is supposed to be.
On 24/07/2013 22:15, gottl...@nyu.edu wrote:
On Wed, Jul 24 2013, Willie WY Wong wrote:
Speaking as a mathematician (and A. Gottlieb will agree with me), I
would be rather annoyed that they chose (if this is not a misquote
from the original proposed documentation) to use '/' for set
On Wed, Jul 24 2013, Alan McKinnon wrote:
You mathematician chaps could probably resolve this one nicely for
yourselves by treating it as just another mangle by Applied
Mathematicians == joke :-)
Careful what you joke about. The New York University comp sci dept (my
home) is part
On 24/07/2013 23:21, gottl...@nyu.edu wrote:
On Wed, Jul 24 2013, Alan McKinnon wrote:
You mathematician chaps could probably resolve this one nicely for
yourselves by treating it as just another mangle by Applied
Mathematicians == joke :-)
Careful what you joke about. The New
On Saturday 15 November 2008 01:24:18 Paul Hartman wrote:
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 5:20 PM, Markos Chandras
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Saturday 15 November 2008 01:07:33 Paul Hartman wrote:
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 4:46 PM, Markos Chandras
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I ve
On Sat, 15 Nov 2008 10:40:25 +0200, Markos Chandras wrote:
I do not have collision-protect on FEATURES, portage MUST merge the
package even if it warns me...
This is my FEATURES line
FEATURES=parallel-fetch buildpkg candy fixpackages ccache sandbox
You don't have -collision-protect
On Saturday 15 November 2008 14:27:49 Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Sat, 15 Nov 2008 10:40:25 +0200, Markos Chandras wrote:
I do not have collision-protect on FEATURES, portage MUST merge the
package even if it warns me...
This is my FEATURES line
FEATURES=parallel-fetch buildpkg candy
Yes, in the same way that disconnecting the warning lamp fixes the low oil
pressure problem in your car :(
--
Neil Bothwick
On 15 Nov 2008, 2:06 PM, Markos Chandras [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Saturday 15 November 2008 14:27:49 Neil Bothwick wrote: On Sat, 15 Nov
2008 10:40:25 +0200,
On Saturday 15 November 2008 16:23:51 Neil Bothwick wrote:
Yes, in the same way that disconnecting the warning lamp fixes the low oil
pressure problem in your car :(
I agree that this is a wrong way to fix it. First of all am gonna fill a bug
about amarok and I ll act accordingly
Thanks
--
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 4:46 PM, Markos Chandras
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I ve upgraded to portage-2.2 . From that time i am having a problem. When
portage finds a collision between two files during the merge time , it
complains
and doesnt merge the new package. The weird thing is
On Saturday 15 November 2008 01:07:33 Paul Hartman wrote:
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 4:46 PM, Markos Chandras
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I ve upgraded to portage-2.2 . From that time i am having a problem.
When
portage finds a collision between two files during the merge time , it
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 5:20 PM, Markos Chandras
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Saturday 15 November 2008 01:07:33 Paul Hartman wrote:
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 4:46 PM, Markos Chandras
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I ve upgraded to portage-2.2 . From that time i am having a problem.
When
29 matches
Mail list logo
