Re: [gentoo-user] Re: {OT} Allow work from home?

Kai Krakow writes: > Am Sat, 20 Feb 2016 10:48:57 +0100 > schrieb lee : > >> Kai Krakow writes: >> >> > Am Fri, 22 Jan 2016 00:52:30 +0100 >> > schrieb lee : >> > >> >> Is WSUS of any use without domains? If it

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: {OT} Allow work from home?

Kai Krakow writes: > Am Sat, 20 Feb 2016 11:24:56 +0100 > schrieb lee : > >> > It uses some very clever ideas to place files into groups and into >> > proper order - other than using file mod and access times like other >> > defrag tools do (which even

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: {OT} Allow work from home?

Kai Krakow writes: > Am Wed, 20 Jan 2016 01:46:29 +0100 > schrieb lee : > >> The time before, it wasn't >> a VM but a very slow machine, and that also took a week. You can have >> the fastest machine on the world and Windoze always manages to bring >> it

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: {OT} Allow work from home?

Kai Krakow writes: > Am Fri, 22 Jan 2016 00:52:30 +0100 > schrieb lee : > >> Is WSUS of any use without domains? If it is, I should take a look at >> it. > > You can use it with and without domains. What domains give you through > GPO is just automatic

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: {OT} Allow work from home?

Kai Krakow writes: > Am Wed, 20 Jan 2016 01:46:29 +0100 > schrieb lee : > >> >> Overcommitting disk space sounds like a very bad idea. >> >> Overcommitting memory is not possible with xen. >> > >> > Overcommitting diskspace isn't such a bad idea,

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: {OT} Allow work from home?

>> The answer to this may be an obvious "yes" but I've never done it so I'm >> not sure. Can I route requests from machine C through machine A only >> for my domain name, and not involve A for C's other internet requests? >> If so, where is that configured? > > While ZT can be used to route

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: {OT} Allow work from home?

On Fri, 22 Jan 2016 11:51:45 -0800, Grant wrote: > > To talk to this computer from another of my machines over ZT I would > > use the 10.252... address. If you tried that address, you'd get > > nowhere as you are not connected to my network. > So if 10.252.252.6 were configured as a router,

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: {OT} Allow work from home?

On Thu, 21 Jan 2016 17:18:27 -0800, Grant wrote: > > There is ZeroTier as a replacement for OpenVPN, and Syncthing for > > syncing. Both are P2P solutions and you can run your own discovery > > servers if you don't want any traffic going through a 3rd party > > (although they don't send data

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: {OT} Allow work from home?

On Fri, 22 Jan 2016 07:52:12 -0500, Rich Freeman wrote: > My understanding is that ZT does not support routing of any kind. > Traffic destined to a ZT peer goes directly to that peer, and that's > it. You can't route over ZT and onto a subnet on a remote peer's > network, or from one peer to

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: {OT} Allow work from home?

On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 7:29 AM, Grant wrote: > > The answer to this may be an obvious "yes" but I've never done it so I'm not > sure. Can I route requests from machine C through machine A only for my > domain name, and not involve A for C's other internet requests? If so,

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: {OT} Allow work from home?

On Fri, 22 Jan 2016 04:29:00 -0800, Grant wrote: > The answer to this may be an obvious "yes" but I've never done it so I'm > not sure. Can I route requests from machine C through machine A only > for my domain name, and not involve A for C's other internet requests? > If so, where is that

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: {OT} Allow work from home?

> As a independent consultant, most companies over the years frown on remote > work. So I've mostly gotten stuck driving a lot, or working on things nobody > else (sane) would touch. So one does develop thick skin; but most of this > work was engineering hardware or embedded systems. It's even

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: {OT} Allow work from home?

On 01/16/2016 07:48 AM, Grant Edwards wrote: >> >> I've set up my home server to act as a Windows-type terminal server >> using X and tigervnc. > > OK, there you're running the X server and client on the same machine, > but the server is using VNC to display remotely. That works. Just > don't