On Tue, 28 Mar 2006 20:41:14 -0800, Ryan Tandy wrote:
Assuming it's the gcc-3.4.5-r1 update you're considering postponing,
you could just:
# echo 'sys-devel/gcc-3.4.5' /etc/portage/package.mask
and just remove that line when you're ready to upgrade. It's a *far*
better idea than
Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Tue, 28 Mar 2006 20:41:14 -0800, Ryan Tandy wrote:
Assuming it's the gcc-3.4.5-r1 update you're considering postponing,
you could just:
# echo 'sys-devel/gcc-3.4.5' /etc/portage/package.mask
and just remove that line when you're ready to upgrade. It's a *far*
Le mardi 28 mars 2006 à 20:41 -0800, Ryan Tandy a écrit :
Teresa and Dale wrote:
Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Tue, 28 Mar 2006 09:50:28 -0600, Teresa and Dale wrote:
Thanks to both. I looked in my world file and I think I upgraded as a
oneshot so why is it upgradeing? I
On Wednesday 29 March 2006 07:10, Teresa and Dale wrote:
I was just going to mask it or upgrade by hand till I had time to mess
with it. I got me a new girlfriend and she has two kids. I go from
nobody to worry about but me to me and three other people to worry
about. Just don't have as
Nagatoro wrote:
Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Tue, 28 Mar 2006 20:41:14 -0800, Ryan Tandy wrote:
Assuming it's the gcc-3.4.5-r1 update you're considering postponing,
you could just:
# echo 'sys-devel/gcc-3.4.5' /etc/portage/package.mask
and just remove that line when you're ready to
Teresa and Dale schreef Nagatoro wrote:
Why don't upgrade? As far as I know upgrading gcc isn't a big deal.
It was just the 3.3.x - 3.4.x that was due to that the api for
c++ had changed.
Oh, I thought it was a big deal. That's why I was wanting to wait.
Funny thing is, it don't want
Holly Bostick wrote:
(other) Funny thing is, last I heard, you were planning to mask the
upgrade versions of GCC. If you did that, of /course/ you are no
longer offered upgrades, since that's the point of masking (to mark a
package as unavailable to be installed on this computer).
gcc-3.4.5-r1
On Tue, 28 Mar 2006 00:06:54 -0600, Teresa and Dale wrote:
I upgraded gcc a while back. I thought I read somewhere that it is best
to just upgrade on occasion with the major upgrades. Should this be
upgraded or should I mask it? This is what I get:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] / # emerge -up world
On Tuesday 28 March 2006 08:06, Teresa and Dale wrote:
Hi,
I upgraded gcc a while back. I thought I read somewhere that it is best
to just upgrade on occasion with the major upgrades. Should this be
upgraded or should I mask it? This is what I get:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] / # emerge -up world
Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
On Tuesday 28 March 2006 08:06, Teresa and Dale wrote:
Hi,
I upgraded gcc a while back. I thought I read somewhere that it is best
to just upgrade on occasion with the major upgrades. Should this be
upgraded or should I mask it? This is what I get:
On Tue, 28 Mar 2006 09:50:28 -0600, Teresa and Dale wrote:
Thanks to both. I looked in my world file and I think I upgraded as a
oneshot so why is it upgradeing? I did the -t option and nothing else
is coming up as pulling it in. Strange.
gcc is part of system.
--
Neil Bothwick
Justify
Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Tue, 28 Mar 2006 09:50:28 -0600, Teresa and Dale wrote:
Thanks to both. I looked in my world file and I think I upgraded as a
oneshot so why is it upgradeing? I did the -t option and nothing else
is coming up as pulling it in. Strange.
gcc is part of system.
Teresa and Dale wrote:
Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Tue, 28 Mar 2006 09:50:28 -0600, Teresa and Dale wrote:
Thanks to both. I looked in my world file and I think I upgraded as a
oneshot so why is it upgradeing? I did the -t option and nothing else
is coming up as pulling it in.
Ryan Tandy wrote:
Teresa and Dale wrote:
Neil Bothwick wrote:
gcc is part of system.
LOL That would be a good reason huh? Where is that file? I'm not real
sure about upgrading this thing right now. Oh, what the heck. I'll
upgrade it anyway.
Thanks
Dale
:-)
14 matches
Mail list logo