On Thu, 01 Dec 2016 10:51:20 +0100, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
> > THere's an ebuild on bgo that I've kept updated to the latest release,
> > I've attached it. However, it uses tesseract as the OCR engine, so I
> > would expect similar results.
> the ebuild you've shared has a dependency on
>
On 11/30/2016 07:37:20 PM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Wed, 30 Nov 2016 13:28:15 -0500, Michael Mol wrote:
> The next tool that looked like it might work, gscan2pdf, wasn't in
> portage, and with the semi-garbled output from tesseract suggesting
the
> scans were too poor quality, I didn't pursue
Did you train tesseract per chance? And could I get some sample images?
Landis
On 11/30/2016 12:28 PM, Michael Mol wrote:
On Wednesday, November 30, 2016 05:34:25 PM J. Roeleveld wrote:
On November 30, 2016 6:03:36 PM GMT+01:00, Michael Mol
wrote:
On Wednesday, November
2016-11-30 16:28 GMT-02:00 Michael Mol :
> On Wednesday, November 30, 2016 05:34:25 PM J. Roeleveld wrote:
> > On November 30, 2016 6:03:36 PM GMT+01:00, Michael Mol <
> mike...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > >On Wednesday, November 30, 2016 10:43:13 AM J. Roeleveld wrote:
> > >> On
On Wed, 30 Nov 2016 13:28:15 -0500, Michael Mol wrote:
> The next tool that looked like it might work, gscan2pdf, wasn't in
> portage, and with the semi-garbled output from tesseract suggesting the
> scans were too poor quality, I didn't pursue further.
THere's an ebuild on bgo that I've kept
On Wednesday, November 30, 2016 05:34:25 PM J. Roeleveld wrote:
> On November 30, 2016 6:03:36 PM GMT+01:00, Michael Mol
wrote:
> >On Wednesday, November 30, 2016 10:43:13 AM J. Roeleveld wrote:
> >> On Tuesday, November 29, 2016 11:18:36 PM k...@aspodata.se wrote:
> >> >
On November 30, 2016 6:03:36 PM GMT+01:00, Michael Mol
wrote:
>On Wednesday, November 30, 2016 10:43:13 AM J. Roeleveld wrote:
>> On Tuesday, November 29, 2016 11:18:36 PM k...@aspodata.se wrote:
>> > Michael Mol:
>> > ...
>> >
>> > > xsane would have let me do it during the
On Wednesday, November 30, 2016 10:43:13 AM J. Roeleveld wrote:
> On Tuesday, November 29, 2016 11:18:36 PM k...@aspodata.se wrote:
> > Michael Mol:
> > ...
> >
> > > xsane would have let me do it during the scan process if I'd thought of
> > > it
> > > then, but the scans are done, drives aren't
On Tuesday, November 29, 2016 01:33:48 PM Michael Mol wrote:
> So, I've got scans of a half dozen new hard drives, and I've got scans of
> their labels. One image has two drives, the other has four.
>
> Rather than manually transcribing the label contents into my intake ticket,
> I'd like to
On Tuesday, November 29, 2016 11:18:36 PM k...@aspodata.se wrote:
> Michael Mol:
> ...
>
> > xsane would have let me do it during the scan process if I'd thought of it
> > then, but the scans are done, drives aren't there any more. Something
>
> ...
>
> If xsane solves your need why don't you
Michael Mol:
...
> xsane would have let me do it during the scan process if I'd thought of it
> then, but the scans are done, drives aren't there any more. Something
...
If xsane solves your need why don't you just print your scans so xsane
can do its job ?
Regards,
/Karl Hammar
11 matches
Mail list logo