Re: [gentoo-user] multi-region OCR

2016-12-01 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Thu, 01 Dec 2016 10:51:20 +0100, Helmut Jarausch wrote: > > THere's an ebuild on bgo that I've kept updated to the latest release, > > I've attached it. However, it uses tesseract as the OCR engine, so I > > would expect similar results. > the ebuild you've shared has a dependency on >

Re: [gentoo-user] multi-region OCR

2016-12-01 Thread Helmut Jarausch
On 11/30/2016 07:37:20 PM, Neil Bothwick wrote: On Wed, 30 Nov 2016 13:28:15 -0500, Michael Mol wrote: > The next tool that looked like it might work, gscan2pdf, wasn't in > portage, and with the semi-garbled output from tesseract suggesting the > scans were too poor quality, I didn't pursue

Re: [gentoo-user] multi-region OCR

2016-11-30 Thread Landis Blackwell
Did you train tesseract per chance? And could I get some sample images? Landis On 11/30/2016 12:28 PM, Michael Mol wrote: On Wednesday, November 30, 2016 05:34:25 PM J. Roeleveld wrote: On November 30, 2016 6:03:36 PM GMT+01:00, Michael Mol wrote: On Wednesday, November

Re: [gentoo-user] multi-region OCR

2016-11-30 Thread Francisco Ares
2016-11-30 16:28 GMT-02:00 Michael Mol : > On Wednesday, November 30, 2016 05:34:25 PM J. Roeleveld wrote: > > On November 30, 2016 6:03:36 PM GMT+01:00, Michael Mol < > mike...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > >On Wednesday, November 30, 2016 10:43:13 AM J. Roeleveld wrote: > > >> On

Re: [gentoo-user] multi-region OCR

2016-11-30 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Wed, 30 Nov 2016 13:28:15 -0500, Michael Mol wrote: > The next tool that looked like it might work, gscan2pdf, wasn't in > portage, and with the semi-garbled output from tesseract suggesting the > scans were too poor quality, I didn't pursue further. THere's an ebuild on bgo that I've kept

Re: [gentoo-user] multi-region OCR

2016-11-30 Thread Michael Mol
On Wednesday, November 30, 2016 05:34:25 PM J. Roeleveld wrote: > On November 30, 2016 6:03:36 PM GMT+01:00, Michael Mol wrote: > >On Wednesday, November 30, 2016 10:43:13 AM J. Roeleveld wrote: > >> On Tuesday, November 29, 2016 11:18:36 PM k...@aspodata.se wrote: > >> >

Re: [gentoo-user] multi-region OCR

2016-11-30 Thread J. Roeleveld
On November 30, 2016 6:03:36 PM GMT+01:00, Michael Mol wrote: >On Wednesday, November 30, 2016 10:43:13 AM J. Roeleveld wrote: >> On Tuesday, November 29, 2016 11:18:36 PM k...@aspodata.se wrote: >> > Michael Mol: >> > ... >> > >> > > xsane would have let me do it during the

Re: [gentoo-user] multi-region OCR

2016-11-30 Thread Michael Mol
On Wednesday, November 30, 2016 10:43:13 AM J. Roeleveld wrote: > On Tuesday, November 29, 2016 11:18:36 PM k...@aspodata.se wrote: > > Michael Mol: > > ... > > > > > xsane would have let me do it during the scan process if I'd thought of > > > it > > > then, but the scans are done, drives aren't

Re: [gentoo-user] multi-region OCR

2016-11-30 Thread J. Roeleveld
On Tuesday, November 29, 2016 01:33:48 PM Michael Mol wrote: > So, I've got scans of a half dozen new hard drives, and I've got scans of > their labels. One image has two drives, the other has four. > > Rather than manually transcribing the label contents into my intake ticket, > I'd like to

Re: [gentoo-user] multi-region OCR

2016-11-30 Thread J. Roeleveld
On Tuesday, November 29, 2016 11:18:36 PM k...@aspodata.se wrote: > Michael Mol: > ... > > > xsane would have let me do it during the scan process if I'd thought of it > > then, but the scans are done, drives aren't there any more. Something > > ... > > If xsane solves your need why don't you

Re: [gentoo-user] multi-region OCR

2016-11-29 Thread karl
Michael Mol: ... > xsane would have let me do it during the scan process if I'd thought of it > then, but the scans are done, drives aren't there any more. Something ... If xsane solves your need why don't you just print your scans so xsane can do its job ? Regards, /Karl Hammar