Hmm, so happens before I could emerge ssh2 had to
emerge -C openssh
I think you'll find that most people use the
programs from openssh. I
would suggest removing net-misc/ssh (again, assuming
this is what you
mean by ssh2, since there is no ssh2 ebuild in the
tree) and
re-merging
Answers are out of order...as they will make more sense that way...
On 4/6/06, maxim wexler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And what's this all got to do with ftp?
Nothing at all. But you were not running an ftp _server_ on the
machine you were trying to connect to. I think it has already been
--- Alexander Skwar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
maxim wexler wrote:
For Mick's benefit I used a variation of this
command
What I don't get is, is why you ask for help when
you obviously do not want to get any help.
Why don't you just start over after having read
ESRs essay about
--- Hans-Werner Hilse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, 3 Apr 2006 08:44:02 -0700 (PDT) maxim wexler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For some reason scp concatenates the source with
the
destination into one non-existing path.
Then why on earth don't you quote actually _useful_
data
--- Mike Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Monday 03 April 2006 16:58, maxim wexler wrote:
what command did you issue?
open sesame
Well that's your problem then, there is no open
command.
ftp *does* have an open command
How about you just stop being obtuse tell us what
On Wed, 5 Apr 2006 15:52:19 -0700 (PDT), maxim wexler wrote:
to help you under
these circumstances is rather pointless.
not unless the point is to appear a pompous blowhard.
~The only way someone is going to be able to help you is if they
understand the problem.Otherwise they will only be
On 4/5/06, maxim wexler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- Hans-Werner Hilse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Then why on earth don't you quote actually _useful_
data for us to help
you, i.e. the command you issued when you get that
error?
from the archive:
snip
Did the OP try something like:
On 4/5/06, maxim wexler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For Mick's benefit I used a variation of this command
variation != *exact*
Most likely you have an error on your command line. Prove us wrong.
-Richard
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
On 03/04/06, maxim wexler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
``/home/heathen/[EMAIL PROTECTED]''.
scp:Scp2/scp2.c:618/transfer_ready_cb: Received error
SSH_FC_OK, error
message .
For some reason scp concatenates the source with the
destination into one non-existing path.
This looks odd
maxim wexler wrote:
--- Bryan Whitehead [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What do you mean by xover? FTP? SCP? NFS? Coda?
HTTP?
xover==crossover.
Yes. So? What do you mean by crossover?
quoteftp didn't work either/unquote
Aha. Why not? What error messages did you get? What's
in the logs?
On Sun, 2 Apr 2006 17:02:37 -0700 (PDT)
maxim wexler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
xover==crossover.
quoteftp didn't work either/unquote
ohhh for gods sake
what command did you issue?
what result did you get?
scp myfile [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/
generally transfers myfile into the home directory of
--- Mick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bryan Whitehead wrote:
He said it could ping... I dunno... seems he
just needs to figure out
how he wants to transfer files.
Did the OP try something like:
===
scp -p -v -c blowfish /local_box_path_to_file
[EMAIL
--- Nick Rout [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 2 Apr 2006 17:02:37 -0700 (PDT)
maxim wexler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
xover==crossover.
quoteftp didn't work either/unquote
ohhh for gods sake
Come down off your cloud, Jupiter!
what command did you issue?
open sesame
what
Hi,
On Mon, 3 Apr 2006 08:44:02 -0700 (PDT) maxim wexler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For some reason scp concatenates the source with the
destination into one non-existing path.
Then why on earth don't you quote actually _useful_ data for us to help
you, i.e. the command you issued when you get
On Monday 03 April 2006 16:58, maxim wexler wrote:
what command did you issue?
open sesame
Well that's your problem then, there is no open command.
How about you just stop being obtuse tell us what command(s) you ran, exactly
as you ran them, not an amazingly high debug output, and perhaps
--- Alexander Skwar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
maxim wexler wrote:
--- Bryan Whitehead [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What do you mean by xover? FTP? SCP? NFS? Coda?
HTTP?
xover==crossover.
Yes. So? What do you mean by crossover?
two PCs, one CAT5 cable w/ tx/rx lines swapped
Bryan Whitehead wrote:
He said it could ping... I dunno... seems he just needs to figure out
how he wants to transfer files.
Did the OP try something like:
===
scp -p -v -c blowfish /local_box_path_to_file
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/mnt/hda5/
===
The above
--- Bryan Whitehead [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What do you mean by xover? FTP? SCP? NFS? Coda?
HTTP?
xover==crossover.
quoteftp didn't work either/unquote
On Sat, 1 Apr 2006, maxim wexler wrote:
Hi everybody,
Anybody got this working between two PCs and can
tell
me how to edit
What do you mean by xover? FTP? SCP? NFS? Coda? HTTP?
On Sat, 1 Apr 2006, maxim wexler wrote:
Hi everybody,
Anybody got this working between two PCs and can tell
me how to edit the conf files?
The NICs are found, the modules are loaded, the net is
up and both PCs can ping each other. But
Bryan Whitehead wrote:
What do you mean by xover? FTP? SCP? NFS? Coda? HTTP?
I guess by xover they mean as in 2 NIC's one cable cross wired!
Matt.
On Sat, 1 Apr 2006, maxim wexler wrote:
Hi everybody,
Anybody got this working between two PCs and can tell
me how to edit the conf files?
He said it could ping... I dunno... seems he just needs to figure out how
he wants to transfer files.
On Sat, 1 Apr 2006, Matt Richards wrote:
Bryan Whitehead wrote:
What do you mean by xover? FTP? SCP? NFS? Coda? HTTP?
I guess by xover they mean as in 2 NIC's one cable cross wired!
Matt.
yea sounds like it, however, ping uses ICMP and file transfer
applications normally use TCP
i have had one case where a computer could ping stuff but nothing else
because the tcp stacked was messed up and only icmp was working...
was a winXP box tho lol . !
Bryan Whitehead wrote:
He said
22 matches
Mail list logo
