On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 07:26:22 +, Mick wrote:
Interesting! Can wicd manage encryption WPA/WPA2 without wpa_supplicant?
No, wpa_supplicant is a dependency of wicd.
--
Neil Bothwick
SCSI: System Can't See It
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On 13 December 2010 09:04, Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote:
On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 07:26:22 +, Mick wrote:
Interesting! Can wicd manage encryption WPA/WPA2 without wpa_supplicant?
No, wpa_supplicant is a dependency of wicd.
Right, I thought as much, but Valmor's removal of
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 02:02:55PM +, Mick wrote:
Right, I thought as much, but Valmor's removal of
/etc/wpa_supplicant/*.conf through me out.
Can wicd write to /etc/wpa_supplicant/wpa_supplicant.conf?
I don't know, but, then again, why would it need to?
I know that wicd does write
On 12/13/2010 09:02 AM, Mick wrote:
On 13 December 2010 09:04, Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote:
On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 07:26:22 +, Mick wrote:
Interesting! Can wicd manage encryption WPA/WPA2 without wpa_supplicant?
No, wpa_supplicant is a dependency of wicd.
Right, I thought as
On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 14:02:55 +, Mick wrote:
Interesting! Can wicd manage encryption WPA/WPA2 without
wpa_supplicant?
No, wpa_supplicant is a dependency of wicd.
Right, I thought as much, but Valmor's removal of
/etc/wpa_supplicant/*.conf through me out.
That wasn't necessary,
Apparently, though unproven, at 18:51 on Sunday 12 December 2010, Valmor de
Almeida did opine thusly:
Hello,
I would like to have net.wlan0 started only when the wireless card is
switched on. I am using ifplugd for starting net.eth0 when an ethernet
cable is plugged in. Is there a similar
On 12/12/2010 03:54 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
Apparently, though unproven, at 18:51 on Sunday 12 December 2010, Valmor de
Almeida did opine thusly:
Hello,
I would like to have net.wlan0 started only when the wireless card is
switched on. I am using ifplugd for starting net.eth0 when an
Apparently, though unproven, at 23:34 on Sunday 12 December 2010, Valmor de
Almeida did opine thusly:
On 12/12/2010 03:54 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
Apparently, though unproven, at 18:51 on Sunday 12 December 2010, Valmor
de
Almeida did opine thusly:
Hello,
I would like to have
On 12/12/2010 04:46 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
Apparently, though unproven, at 23:34 on Sunday 12 December 2010, Valmor de
Almeida did opine thusly:
On 12/12/2010 03:54 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
Apparently, though unproven, at 18:51 on Sunday 12 December 2010, Valmor
de
Almeida did opine
On Monday 13 December 2010 07:05:20 Valmor de Almeida wrote:
On 12/12/2010 04:46 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
Apparently, though unproven, at 23:34 on Sunday 12 December 2010, Valmor
de
Almeida did opine thusly:
On 12/12/2010 03:54 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
Apparently, though unproven, at
10 matches
Mail list logo
