Re: [gentoo-user] suspend2-sources-2.6.14-r9 - Hard Maskd: Why?
Rumen Yotov schrieb: Hi, Run: nano /var/portage/profiles/package.mask - search for suspend; ... # Henrik Brix Andersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] (31 Dec 2005) # Compilation broken without CONFIG_X86_MCE =sys-kernel/suspend2-sources-2.6.14-r9 ... HTH.Rumen Ah, yes, right, forgot about this. Why is something like this not listed in the changelog on CVS? Thanks, Alexander Skwar -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] suspend2-sources-2.6.14-r9 - Hard Maskd: Why?
Alexander Skwar wrote: Rumen Yotov schrieb: Hi, Run: nano /var/portage/profiles/package.mask - search for suspend; ... # Henrik Brix Andersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] (31 Dec 2005) # Compilation broken without CONFIG_X86_MCE =sys-kernel/suspend2-sources-2.6.14-r9 ... HTH.Rumen Ah, yes, right, forgot about this. Why is something like this not listed in the changelog on CVS? ChangeLog only lists changes done in the package folder. package.masking needs changes only to the package.mask file. Regards, Petteri signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [gentoo-user] suspend2-sources-2.6.14-r9 - Hard Maskd: Why?
Petteri Räty schrieb: Alexander Skwar wrote: Rumen Yotov schrieb: Run: nano /var/portage/profiles/package.mask - search for suspend; Ah, yes, right, forgot about this. Why is something like this not listed in the changelog on CVS? ChangeLog only lists changes done in the package folder. package.masking needs changes only to the package.mask file. Okay. But it is change to the package, isn't it? I mean, it now behaves differently than it did before. I guess, I don't agree with this decision - but I further guess, that I'll have to live with it, don't I? Alexander Skwar -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] suspend2-sources-2.6.14-r9 - Hard Maskd: Why?
Alexander Skwar wrote: Petteri Räty schrieb: Alexander Skwar wrote: Rumen Yotov schrieb: Run: nano /var/portage/profiles/package.mask - search for suspend; Ah, yes, right, forgot about this. Why is something like this not listed in the changelog on CVS? ChangeLog only lists changes done in the package folder. package.masking needs changes only to the package.mask file. Okay. But it is change to the package, isn't it? I mean, it now behaves differently than it did before. True. I don't think it is against the policy to add package.masking information to ChangeLogs but devs just don't do it at the moment. This is maybe something you could bring up in the gentoo-dev mailing list. I guess, I don't agree with this decision - but I further guess, that I'll have to live with it, don't I? Well emerge -1 =pkg-masked version should give you easy access to the package.mask reason to help you in the meanwhile. Regards, Petteri signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature