Re: [gentoo-user] suspend2-sources-2.6.14-r9 - Hard Maskd: Why?

2006-01-01 Thread Alexander Skwar
Rumen Yotov schrieb:

 Hi,
 Run: nano /var/portage/profiles/package.mask - search for suspend;
 ...
 # Henrik Brix Andersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] (31 Dec 2005)
 # Compilation broken without CONFIG_X86_MCE
 =sys-kernel/suspend2-sources-2.6.14-r9
 ...
 HTH.Rumen

Ah, yes, right, forgot about this. Why is something like
this not listed in the changelog on CVS?

Thanks,

Alexander Skwar
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] suspend2-sources-2.6.14-r9 - Hard Maskd: Why?

2006-01-01 Thread Petteri Räty
Alexander Skwar wrote:
 Rumen Yotov schrieb:
 
 
Hi,
Run: nano /var/portage/profiles/package.mask - search for suspend;
...
# Henrik Brix Andersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] (31 Dec 2005)
# Compilation broken without CONFIG_X86_MCE
=sys-kernel/suspend2-sources-2.6.14-r9
...
HTH.Rumen
 
 
 Ah, yes, right, forgot about this. Why is something like
 this not listed in the changelog on CVS?
 

ChangeLog only lists changes done in the package folder. package.masking
needs changes only to the package.mask file.

Regards,
Petteri


signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: [gentoo-user] suspend2-sources-2.6.14-r9 - Hard Maskd: Why?

2006-01-01 Thread Alexander Skwar
Petteri Räty schrieb:
 Alexander Skwar wrote:
 Rumen Yotov schrieb:

Run: nano /var/portage/profiles/package.mask - search for suspend;

 Ah, yes, right, forgot about this. Why is something like
 this not listed in the changelog on CVS?
 
 ChangeLog only lists changes done in the package folder. package.masking
 needs changes only to the package.mask file.

Okay. But it is change to the package, isn't it? I mean, it now
behaves differently than it did before.

I guess, I don't agree with this decision - but I further guess,
that I'll have to live with it, don't I?

Alexander Skwar
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] suspend2-sources-2.6.14-r9 - Hard Maskd: Why?

2006-01-01 Thread Petteri Räty
Alexander Skwar wrote:
 Petteri Räty schrieb:
 
Alexander Skwar wrote:

Rumen Yotov schrieb:
 
 
Run: nano /var/portage/profiles/package.mask - search for suspend;
 
 
Ah, yes, right, forgot about this. Why is something like
this not listed in the changelog on CVS?

ChangeLog only lists changes done in the package folder. package.masking
needs changes only to the package.mask file.
 
 
 Okay. But it is change to the package, isn't it? I mean, it now
 behaves differently than it did before.

True. I don't think it is against the policy to add package.masking
information to ChangeLogs but devs just don't do it at the moment. This
is maybe something you could bring up in the gentoo-dev mailing list.

 I guess, I don't agree with this decision - but I further guess,
 that I'll have to live with it, don't I?
 

Well emerge -1 =pkg-masked version should give you easy access to
the package.mask reason to help you in the meanwhile.

Regards,
Petteri



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature