On 21-Jul-2003, Joao S. O. Bueno wrote:
On Monday 21 July 2003 4:47 pm, Adam D. Moss wrote:
Patrick McFarland wrote:
So, if gegl isnt going to be in gimp2, when will it be?
Ive been waiting for gimp2 awhile now, and now that gegl wont be
in it, I have to keep waiting. How long will
Daniel Egger wrote:
Am Mon, 2003-07-21 um 23.21 schrieb Jakub Steiner:
I think this would be pretty elegant and would appeal to me personaly to
write some particular doc. Write documentation is a horrid picture to
me. An insanely large task. Write a particular section actually sounds
fun.
On Mon, 2003-07-21 at 23:48, Daniel Egger wrote:
We have had this notice in GIMP for quite a while which means that you
either never even used the helpbrowser or didn't care. :/
However, I offer you the chance to write a particular section for the
docs right away... Wanna pick a topic? :)
Hi,
Daniel Egger [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The biggest advantage is that we can expect a working
browser on almost every box that GIMP gets installed to.
But a browser doesn't necessarily sport the navigation features one
would like to have, or a global find function. Also a browser is
Hi,
the Camp is getting closer and we are going into details of GimpTent
preparations. I thought I should let you know what is happening here
so that you know what you are missing if you don't attend.
As a short summary in case you don't know yet, the Chaos Communication
Camp is an international
Daniel Egger wrote:
On Tue, Jul 22, 2003 at 09:46:17AM +0200, David Neary wrote:
Would it take you long to put together a list of topics that docs
are needed for? We could cross-post to the gimp-users list, and
maybe send a copy to the GUG and see if anyone there is
interested in helping
Daniel Egger wrote:
Am Mon, 2003-07-21 um 23.17 schrieb Carol Spears:
i spent some quality time with docbook; olink, ulink and kin.
docbook was not written for gimp. Not the gimp as i understand
it at least.
DocBook was written exactly for the purpose we need.
I tried to work with
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ( Marc) (A.) (Lehmann ) wrote:
On Mon, Jul 21, 2003 at 04:36:53PM +0200, Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What is so insisting is that you are not telling the truth, and I
wonder why you resort to that.
I am not going to let you claim in public that I was lying to
Hi,
can we please try to avoid a flamewar about DocBook here. All our help
is in DocBook, it is a well established format for this purpose. I
admit that it can be quite complex but it is well documented and you
usually need a small subset only. I am sure that people who want to
contribute
Hi all,
As most of you know, we are approaching a feature freeze leading
up to the next stable release (I don't want to get into any
fights - although I personally think 2.0 is better, I don't
actually care what it's called, as long as it gets released).
A feature freeze means we draw a line in
Hi,
I announced the plan to do 1.3.17 last weekend but didn't manage to
get it done. Then I wanted to do it yesterday and since that failed as
well, I announced it for tonite. However since there are a few things
that need to be organized for gimpcon I will again not manage to do
the release. I
Carol Spears wrote:
Daniel Egger wrote:
DocBook was written exactly for the purpose we need.
as much as i love gimp, i wonder if someone got their rent paid
from netscape.com for making that my choice regardless. With
everything else being so sensible in gimp, how come i did not
get a
On Tue, Jul 22, 2003 at 02:51:16PM -0400, Carol Spears [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
is it worth building the gimp-perl module from cvs yet?
Depends on what you are needing it for.
The evrsion in CVS seems to be fully working, except that none of the
examples that use their own Gtk+ interface have
Its still pretty bleeding edge. You'll need to get bleeding edge perl modules
(which ones are documented in the gimp-perl cvs) Some stuff works, some
doesn't. Its not looking likely I'll get a chance to do bring everything up to
date from the plug-in side, and numerous Gtk problems still exist.
14 matches
Mail list logo
