On 2/1/11, Christopher Curtis wrote:
I would agree that there are problems with the way people tend to
interact on this list. One of which is the knee-jerk reaction
whenever an email comes across with the word Photoshop in it.
What you call knee-jerk reaction is the result of generations of
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 2:39 AM, gespert...@gmail.com
gespert...@gmail.com wrote:
A couple of days ago a voluntary coder (with an impressive CV) arrived
to this list offering his help and he only got a couple of replies.
This pointless discussion got a lot more of attention.
This discussion is
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 4:00 AM, Alexandre Prokoudine
alexandre.prokoud...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2/1/11, Christopher Curtis wrote:
interact on this list. One of which is the knee-jerk reaction
whenever an email comes across with the word Photoshop in it.
What you call knee-jerk reaction is the
On Tue, 1 Feb 2011 09:30:05 -0500
Christopher Curtis ccurt...@gmail.com wrote:
I asked if anyone would complain about a patch that brings GIMP in
line with every other program that I could find wrt using Backspace as
color fill. One person objected, nobody said it would be a fine patch
--
Alexandre Prokoudine alexandre.prokoudine at gmail.com writes:
On 2/1/11, Christopher Curtis wrote:
I would agree that there are problems with the way people tend to
interact on this list. One of which is the knee-jerk reaction
whenever an email comes across with the word Photoshop in
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 5:17 PM, Michael Grosberg
grosberg.mich...@gmail.com wrote:
Add a single For Photoshop users page to the help file. There, tell users
how
to change the menurc file so they have photoshop-like keys. This won't change
the application in any way, and will enable those who
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 6:17 PM, Michael Grosberg wrote:
How about this as a suggestion:
Find an existing menuRc files with photoshop key bindings. Ask the author if
it
can be included in a Gimp release. Include it as a renamed file so its not
loaded by default. find a maintainer for it (the
As it was stated before, making applications act similar doesn't
turn out in familiarity, but in a percepction of incompleteness. The
most our applications looks like others, the most former users of
other applications will spot what's missing, perceiving differences as
limitations.
When I
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 5:30 PM, Christopher Curtis wrote:
What you call knee-jerk reaction is the result of generations of
users coming and telling the team to just make GIMP like Photoshop or
I recognize the root of the issue, but that makes it no less an issue.
What may seem to you like
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 1:45 PM, Alexandre Prokoudine
alexandre.prokoud...@gmail.com wrote:
Because people talk about the big picture. Pretty please carefully
reread what Jon Cruz wrote in the thread. It's a spot-on message.
You mean Jon Senior?
js
--
Alexandre Prokoudine
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 6:55 PM, Joao S. O. Bueno wrote:
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 1:45 PM, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
Because people talk about the big picture. Pretty please carefully
reread what Jon Cruz wrote in the thread. It's a spot-on message.
You mean Jon Senior?
Nope. I did mean Jon
Alexandre Prokoudine alexandre.prokoudine at gmail.com writes:
*sigh*
http://git.gnome.org/browse/gimp/tree/etc/ps-menurc
Alexandre Prokoudine
http://libregraphicsworld.org
I will refrain from expressing my opinion on undocumented, undiscoverable
features.
Now only a help page is
On Tue, 1 Feb 2011 19:01:12 +0300
Alexandre Prokoudine alexandre.prokoud...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 6:55 PM, Joao S. O. Bueno wrote:
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 1:45 PM, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
Because people talk about the big picture. Pretty please carefully
reread what
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 8:16 PM, Michael Grosberg wrote:
I will refrain from expressing my opinion on undocumented, undiscoverable
features.
Now only a help page is needed. I think I'll go and join the Gimp-Docs
mailing list and take it from there. This is an area in which I have a lot
of
On 02/01/2011 06:25 PM, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 8:16 PM, Michael Grosberg wrote:
I will refrain from expressing my opinion on undocumented, undiscoverable
features.
Now only a help page is needed. I think I'll go and join the Gimp-Docs
mailing list and take it
On 02/01/2011 06:25 PM, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 8:16 PM, Michael Grosberg wrote:
I will refrain from expressing my opinion on undocumented,
undiscoverable features.
Now only a help page is needed. I think I'll go and join the
Gimp-Docs mailing list and take
On Tue, 2011-02-01 at 17:16 +, Michael Grosberg wrote:
Alexandre Prokoudine alexandre.prokoudine at gmail.com writes:
*sigh*
http://git.gnome.org/browse/gimp/tree/etc/ps-menurc
Alexandre Prokoudine
http://libregraphicsworld.org
I will refrain from expressing my opinion
As it was stated before, making applications act similar doesn't
turn out in familiarity, but in a percepction of incompleteness. The
most our applications looks like others, the most former users of
other applications will spot what's missing, perceiving differences as
limitations.
When I
On Tue, 2011-02-01 at 17:16 +, Michael Grosberg wrote:
Alexandre Prokoudine alexandre.prokoudine at gmail.com writes:
*sigh*
http://git.gnome.org/browse/gimp/tree/etc/ps-menurc
Alexandre Prokoudine
http://libregraphicsworld.org
I will refrain from expressing
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 5:17 PM, Michael Grosberg
grosberg.mich...@gmail.com wrote:
Add a single For Photoshop users page to the help file. There,
tell users how to change the menurc file so they have
photoshop-like keys. This won't change the application in any way,
and will enable those
And all this conversation is because you think CTRL+Backspace makes
more sense than CTRL+. (because you're used to that combination) and
you don't want to take 30 seconds of your time to personalize the
accelerators?
Seriously?
If think so then I'm afraid that you didn't read my posts
On Wednesday, February 02, 2011 01:28:04 Bogdan Szczurek wrote:
This pointless discussion got a lot more of attention.
Pointless it is if it doesn't bring any changes but that can be said
only after it's over. Right now I can see that there's at least a will
to at least make things clearer
On Jan 30, 2011, at 12:12 PM, Liam R E Quin wrote:
On Sun, 2011-01-30 at 01:43 +0100, Bogdan Szczurek wrote:
The thing is, that we concluded that permamenet transition or even
occasional use of Gimp would be much more appealing for Ps-bred
guys (like me ;)) if one would have
ROFL
On 02/01/2011 03:54 PM, Ofnuts wrote:
On 02/01/2011 06:25 PM, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 8:16 PM, Michael Grosberg wrote:
I will refrain from expressing my opinion on undocumented, undiscoverable
features.
Now only a help page is needed. I think I'll go and join
Furthermore, collaborating with Inkscape *instead* makes a lot of
sense, because GIMP + Inkscape are a usual combo. Blindly reusing
shortcuts from old Adobe products doesn't make a lot of sense.
Blindly—yes. But proposition is not to do it that way. My reason is: I
want to promote GIMP to e.g.
25 matches
Mail list logo
