Rob Savoye wrote:
On 02/16/10 07:54, Peter Vermaas wrote:
Rob Savoye wrote:
Thanks for the .bbfile. It works now, with gui=fb, if I comment out the
do_install_append() part. When I use --enable-media=gst I have to
add some extra packages: libgnashagg libgnashmedia libgnashsound
libgnashcore
Rob Savoye wrote:
Peter Vermaas wrote:
I used an older modified bbfile. I now rechecked a recent 0.8.5 version
and added -I${STAGING_INCDIR}/libxml2 to TARGET_CC_ARCH_append.
this has solved this problem.
I just added the libxml2 config test back in for the release, making
new debs and
I'm trying to compile the 0.8.7. pre-release from
http://www.getgnash.org/packages/pre-release-testing/
for the arm on openembedded and I'm getting the following errors:
arm-angstrom-linux-gnueabi-libtool: compile: arm-angstrom-linux-gnueabi-g++
-march=armv5te -mtune=xscale
Peter Vermaas wrote:
So it looks like the libxml include files cannot be found.
Version 0.8.6 had a configure option I used to set the path
--with-libxml2-incl=. I'm missing this option in 0.8.7.
Is it still possible to add this for 0.8.7?
I made new rc2 release files, with this fixed
I'm trying to compile the 0.8.7. pre-release from
http://www.getgnash.org/packages/pre-release-testing/
for the arm on openembedded and I'm getting the following errors:
arm-angstrom-linux-gnueabi-libtool: compile: arm-angstrom-linux-gnueabi-g++
-march=armv5te -mtune=xscale -mthumb-interwork
Peter Vermaas wrote:
I'm trying to compile the 0.8.7. pre-release from
http://www.getgnash.org/packages/pre-release-testing/
for the arm on openembedded and I'm getting the following errors:
Did you use the old bbfile, or the new one ? My last OE build worked fine.
So it looks like the
Course
with OE, you're not using pkg-config, so you don't get those flags.
Sigh, I will have to add the config test back in I guess, I only removed
it a few days ago.
I am rather ignorant of autoconf and packaging, but it seems completely
crazy to me that we should ever add config tests for
Benjamin Wolsey wrote:
I am rather ignorant of autoconf and packaging, but it seems completely
crazy to me that we should ever add config tests for dependencies of
dependencies. Is there really not a better way of doing it?
Not really... It's mostly just the header files included by the
8 matches
Mail list logo
