Okay, as requested -- after having a little fun anonymizing this email
flameware from about six years ago, I've posted it at
http://www.linuxlobbyist.org/rpdebate/ for a limited time. There may be
traces of stuff I've missed in my sed script, but it should be enough
to protect the innocent
And attached is the cast of characters.
On Mon, Feb 18, 2002 at 06:20:14PM -0500, Paul Iadonisi wrote:
Okay, as requested -- after having a little fun anonymizing this email
flameware from about six years ago, I've posted it at
http://www.linuxlobbyist.org/rpdebate/ for a limited time.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
At some point hitherto, Paul Iadonisi hath spake thusly:
Okay, as requested -- after having a little fun anonymizing this email
flameware from about six years ago, I've posted it at
http://www.linuxlobbyist.org/rpdebate/ for a limited time.
On Mon, 18 Feb 2002, Paul Iadonisi wrote:
Okay, as requested -- after having a little fun anonymizing this email
flameware from about six years ago, I've posted it at
http://www.linuxlobbyist.org/rpdebate/ for a limited time. There may be
traces of stuff I've missed in my sed script, but
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
At some point hitherto, Benjamin Scott hath spake thusly:
On Mon, 18 Feb 2002, Paul Iadonisi wrote:
But that's downright mild compared to the flamewar GNHLUG had over who
should have root passwords. That was before mail-archive.com, though, so
On Thu, 14 Feb 2002, Paul Iadonisi wrote:
Seriously, and to diverge a bit from this thread, this does *not* however
mean that console access implies lack of physical security.
Not always, but typically, it does.
o Login as a normal non-root user on the console of Red Hat 7.2 system
with
On Thu, 14 Feb 2002, Paul Lussier wrote:
As Derek and I have been heard to complain about many times, RH's biggest
problem seems to be that they don't have any professional sysadmins
working for them who have a clue about how things are done in large
enterprise environments! :(
While I
In a message dated: Thu, 14 Feb 2002 13:30:43 EST
Benjamin Scott said:
While I think you are generally right, in Red Hat's defense, even in large
enterprise environments, your average desktop workstation can generally be
shutdown by the user using it. Or do you encase all your workstations
On Thu, 14 Feb 2002, Paul Lussier wrote:
While I think you are generally right, in Red Hat's defense, even in
large enterprise environments, your average desktop workstation can
generally be shutdown by the user using it.
Well, short of hitting the power buttons, normal users couldn't
On Thu, Feb 14, 2002 at 01:30:43PM -0500, Benjamin Scott wrote:
On Thu, 14 Feb 2002, Paul Lussier wrote:
As Derek and I have been heard to complain about many times, RH's biggest
problem seems to be that they don't have any professional sysadmins
working for them who have a clue about how
On Thu, 14 Feb 2002, Paul Iadonisi wrote:
Or do you encase all your workstations in
safes under the floor like Paul Iadonisi does? ;-)
Zing! I guess I had that coming.
Heh. Don't get me wrong, I was more trying to give credit where it is due
than imply you were being unreasonable. In
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
At some point hitherto, Benjamin Scott hath spake thusly:
... for a wild flamewar I started about root passwords.
Hah! I think the longest flamewar in GNHLUG history was on that very
subject. (With the possible exception of the GNU/Linux
12 matches
Mail list logo
