RE: Load Balancing

2002-05-23 Thread Tilly, Lawrence
. :-) If your config is significantly different or if I misread your question, just let me know. -Lawrence -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 3:34 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Load Balancing

RE: Load Balancing

2002-05-23 Thread chadrh
This is my question also. Now, I'm not an expert on security in any way shape or form, I would classify myself as a novice at best. I do understand defense in depth and multiple layers but I have the same question that Lawrence does. Unless your webserver sits completely naked outside your

Re: Load Balancing

2002-05-22 Thread Kenneth E. Lussier
On Wed, 2002-05-22 at 14:41, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Does anyone have any suggestions (besides beating the hell out of the person that wants to run an IIS webserver)? And explain to us again why this isn't a good idea anyway? I didn't say it wasn't a god idea. As a matter of fact, it

RE: Load Balancing

2002-05-22 Thread Lawrence.Tilly
anyway: http://www.onjava.com/lpt/a//onjava/2001/09/26/load.html -Lawrence -Original Message- From: Kenneth E. Lussier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 2:47 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Load Balancing On Wed, 2002-05-22 at 14:41

Re: Load Balancing

2002-05-22 Thread pll
In a message dated: Wed, 22 May 2002 14:59:07 EDT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Just a quick warning if any of your servers are going to run ssl. Load balancing in this form cannot really be done against an ssl transaction - something I've found from research and experience (unfortunately, the

Re: Load Balancing

2002-05-22 Thread Bayard Coolidge USG
[EMAIL PROTECTED] uttered: RH acquiring the DEC^H^H^HCOMPAQ^H^H^H^H^H^HMCLX clustering group :) Ahem... No, Red Hat hired a couple of engineers who used to work for the now moribund Mission Critical Linux, who also happened to work for Compaq's Tru64 UNIX engineering group before that. The

RE: Load Balancing

2002-05-22 Thread chadrh
The best solution is to offload SSL encryption/decryption from the web server to a seperate device. Then you can load balance the web servers independent of the SSL overhead. This is shown in the final example on the page Lawrence sent along. I actually represent a company that is

Re: Load Balancing

2002-05-22 Thread Richard Soule
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I actually represent a company that is considering bringing a low cost hardware SSL accelarator into the US market, we're just trying to determine how much demand there might be for the product. It integrates with any load balancing tool seamlessly. I see requests

Re: Load Balancing

2002-05-22 Thread pll
In a message dated: Wed, 22 May 2002 13:12:42 PDT Richard Soule said: I see requests for this type of device/functionality all the time from our customers. Team up with a company that has an application/web server that currently only does SSL in software. Go after their install base... Or,

Re: Load Balancing

2002-05-22 Thread Henry L. Hall
To expand the tree of knowledge a little further on this topic: http://www.ultramonkey.org/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In a message dated: 22 May 2002 14:27:40 EDT Kenneth E. Lussier said: I think that LVS might be what I'm looking for Ayup! That's what you want! Does anyone have