On Fri, 5 Apr 2002, Benjamin Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Karl Runge is on the right track. X is very senstive to latency. The
bandwidth requirements can actually be fairly minor for simple constructs
(e.g., a GNU Emacs window), but a high-latency link will kill you.
Yes, and I wanted
dxpc will speed things up even more. dxpc compresses the X *protocol*
that gets you more then compressing the bits. Here's some directions
I wrote to remind myself:
-
remotely working on a laptop
login to work system
set display to
On Sun, 7 Apr 2002, at 8:11pm, Tom Buskey wrote:
dxpc will speed things up even more. dxpc compresses the X *protocol*
that gets you more then compressing the bits.
We're not talking about size-of-transactions here but the sensitivity to
latency -- which, roughly speaking, might be
Benjamin Scott said:
On Sun, 7 Apr 2002, at 8:11pm, Tom Buskey wrote:
dxpc will speed things up even more. dxpc compresses the X *protocol*
that gets you more then compressing the bits.
We're not talking about size-of-transactions here but the sensitivity to
latency -- which, roughly
On Sun, 2002-04-07 at 21:46, Tom Buskey wrote:
http://www.vigor.nu/dxpc/ -- hard to find DXPC home page
It can't be that hard to find when its the first result on google :)
Adam
*
To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to
