Re: hello once again and perl

2000-03-19 Thread Charles C. Bennett, Jr.
Hi Ray - I'm cleaning out my mailbox and ran across your message about running Perl on Win32 and issues about dynamic swap sizing... While it is not exactly dynamic swap, you can use files *in the filesystem* to do swapping. This will work in a pinch. See the mkswap manpage for more

RE: hello once again and perl

2000-02-09 Thread Kevin D. Clark
Karl J. Runge writes: Neat. Is it copy on write? (i.e. pages are copied when written to, as opposed to copy the whole process image at fork time). I UTSL'd through the code over lunch today, and it turns out that they're emulating fork() with a combination of threads and cloning the

RE: hello once again and perl

2000-02-08 Thread Jamie Blondin
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jim Ryan Sent: Tuesday, February 08, 2000 8:18 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: hello once again and perl As regards Perl. I know nothing about it at this point. Would this be a good tool

Re: hello once again and perl

2000-02-08 Thread Matt Herbert
Benjamin Scott wrote: On Mon, 7 Feb 2000, Chris Bourassa wrote: I am planning on learning (at least start) Perl. How different is Linux Perl compared to (yuch) Perl for Win32. I'm going to respectfully disagree with the people here who have stated that Perl on Win32 isn't like Perl

Re: hello once again and perl

2000-02-08 Thread Thomas Charron
Quoting Chris Bourassa [EMAIL PROTECTED]: As much as this is blasphemous, but I do not have my Linux box up and running yet (not for at least a month for parts) but I am planning on learning (at least start) Perl. How different is Linux Perl compared to (yuch) Perl for Win32. I plan on

RE: hello once again and perl

2000-02-08 Thread Thomas Charron
Quoting Jamie Blondin [EMAIL PROTECTED]: As for differences - there are a few. The work of ActivePerl (www.activeperl.com) has not been without fruition, however, and they've managed to create a usable (barely) port of Perl and several common packages. Be warned, though, you may find

RE: hello once again and perl

2000-02-08 Thread Karl J. Runge
Does Perl on Win32 have the fork() call yet? If so, is it reasonably fast (as it is on Unix)? fork() is a nice, simple way to make a server (for example). I would guess if perl 5.005 is on Win32 it has threads, no? (not that I'd really ever want to use threads in perl...) Karl Runge On Mon, 7

RE: hello once again and perl

2000-02-08 Thread Raymond Cote
Sent: Tuesday, February 08, 2000 1:35 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: hello once again and perl On Mon, 7 Feb 2000, Chris Bourassa wrote: I am planning on learning (at least start) Perl. How different is Linux Perl compared to (yuch) Perl for Win32. I'm going to respectfully

RE: hello once again and perl

2000-02-08 Thread Kevin D. Clark
Karl J. Runge writes: Does Perl on Win32 have the fork() call yet? If so, is it reasonably fast (as it is on Unix)? fork() is a nice, simple way to make a server (for example). $ uname -a Windows_NT CLARK2 4.0 17.5 i686 $ perl -v This is perl, version 5.004_04 built for cygwin32 Copyright

Re: hello once again and perl

2000-02-07 Thread Kenneth E. Lussier
Perl for Win32. Kind of like trying to race the Indy500 with a skateboard, isn't it? If the only thing that you have access to is a Windozw box, you may want to try downloading CygWin32. It gives you a bash shell on a Windoze box. It also has *REAL* Perl. There is also a commercial product called