On Sun, 2003-10-05 at 22:53, Brian Riley (maillist) wrote:
This would defeat the whole purpose of having the print server,
Then go with the first setup I described. I only mentioned SMB because
its also an option.
C
___
gnhlug-discuss mailing list
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 04 Oct 2003 12:55:14 -0400
Tom Fogal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
why does one need support for a[/any] linux distribution?
With respect to the other posts, I think that it is important for Linux
to be commercially available. By this I mean
On Mon, 6 Oct 2003 10:17:57 -0400 (EDT)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 3 Oct 2003, at 7:46pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Debian. Long release cycles, stable, testing, and bleeding edge
versions all available for the same price ($0), and a ton of community
support :)
Unfortunately,
To the Citizens Against Government Waste,
the state officials of Massachusetts, and others
Paul Lussier's defense of the Massachusetts initiative for free
software does not go far enough, because it endorses a grave error:
the idea that government decisions about software should be based only
On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 10:17:57AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There's at least one project that exists to independently build binary
RPMs for RHEL, from the SRPMs which RHS must, by law, provide. See:
http://www2.uibk.ac.at/zid/software/unix/linux/rhel-rebuild-l.html
On Mon, 6 Oct 2003, at 1:03pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
RH only needs to provide the source for software with GPL, LGPL, or
similar licenses.
A, good point. Red Hat, so far, has always maintained that they will
provide source for all of their Open Source products, even non-GPL ones, but
Hello list,
As mentioned previously, GNHLUG had a booth at the Fall 2003 Hosstraders.
We sold a lot of Linux CDs -- approximately 130 discs. Any money left over
after expenses will be added to the GNHLUG General Fund. (I'm assuming we
have a General Fund. If not, we'll have to create one.)
On Mon, 6 Oct 2003, at 9:37am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
With these changes by Red Hat, we're re-evaluating our plans here at Net
Technologies. I'm seriously considering Debian, but the lack of support
from our vendors (e.g., Dell) means other problems.
Vendors schmendors.
Nice to say.
On Mon, 6 Oct 2003, at 10:43am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Debian...
... near-zero support from major third-party vendors ...
... whenever support and Debian occur in the same sentence, Libranet
should come to mind ...
Clarification: I'm not referring to getting support in administering
I'd like to take a moment to thank Ben, Maddog, Mike, and all the others
who put their very valuable time into these activities.
It does wonders for the group, but most importantly, it gets the word
out and establishes a good and friendly foundation among the more
knowledgeable users. We get this
10 matches
Mail list logo
