On Fri, 12 Oct 2007 18:12:47 -0400
Bruce Dawson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thomas Charron wrote:
So, now that http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20071011205044141
is out there..
What are peoples thoughts on the patent in question?
On 10/12/07, Michael ODonnell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
During a bout of insomnia I caught this broadcast
live on the BBC last night and liked it a lot:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/worldservice/programmes/global_business.shtml
I've always regarded the presenter, Peter Day, as generally
cool and
Jerry,
It is curious that only Red Hat and Novell
are the plaintiffs. Why not FSF (GNOME), of X.ORG, or TrollTech (KDE
and QT).
I think you meant that Red Hat and Novell are the defendants, not the
plaintiffs, in this suit. Having a few defendants at one time is a
normal thing. You only
On Thu, October 11, 2007 11:37 pm, Ben Scott said:
Of course, if you're using bash, then
http://xkcd.com/{1..327}
will do the job without all the messy syntax or the external program.
Depends on what version of bash. The first time I tried that, it failed:
$ echo
Fall cleaning instead of spring cleaning here... I've got the
following hardware up for grabs:
- A matching pair of Opteron 244 (1.8GHz socket 940) processors w/
heatsinks (they work just fine so far as I know, they were pulled for
faster procs a while ago).
- Qty. 3 QLogic 2100-series
