Boston Linux Meeting reminder Tonight, March 19, 2008 Linux Soup XI: High-End Audio on Linux

2008-03-19 Thread Jerry Feldman
When: March 19, 2008 7:00PM (6:30 for QA) Topic: Linux Soup XI: High-End Audio on Linux Moderator: Christoph Doerbeck Location: MIT Building E51 Room 335 In the last few years Linux has made great strides forward in the provision of professional applications for the creation, manipulation, and

Re: Setting up separate network question

2008-03-19 Thread Bill Ricker
Definitely keep your paperwork in order. Sounds like what you need is corporate paperwork defining the cluster as a peripheral execution-accelerator of the CentOs box, defining the gig-E or whatever cluster-bus as a cluster-bus not a hidden lan segment. Alternatively, get the Network guys to

[GNHLUG] MerriLUG Nashua, Thur 20 Mar, Dinner at Martha's

2008-03-19 Thread Jim Kuzdrall
Who  : The friendly, suave, intelligent, knowledgeable MerriLUG group What : Whatever interests you Where: Martha's Exchange Day  : Thur 20 Mar **Tomorrow** Time : 6:00 PM for grub (no upstairs discussion this month) :: Overview We will use this opportunity for some friendly conversation around

Writing FOSS for Win32: A good LUG meeting topic?

2008-03-19 Thread VirginSnow
Hey, folks, I'v. been thinking again... (pause for groans). Does anyone here think that Writing FOSS applications for Win32 would be a good presentation topic for a LUG meeting? Is anyone here expert on this topic? (Note: I'm not!) ___ gnhlug-discuss

Re: Writing FOSS for Win32: A good LUG meeting topic?

2008-03-19 Thread David J Berube
*shrug*. FWIW, I am, and I'd be happy to discuss it. Not sure how much interest there is, though. Take it easy, David Berube Berube Consulting [EMAIL PROTECTED] (603)-485-9622 http://www.berubeconsulting.com/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hey, folks, I'v. been thinking again... (pause for groans).

Re: Setting up separate network question

2008-03-19 Thread Ben Scott
On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 5:59 PM, Labitt, Bruce [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Geesh, didn't mean to make it so complicated... You didn't. Complexity spontaneously generates from the ether. :) However, using the CentOs box as a gateway/router is not allowed on my network, by company policy.

Re: Writing FOSS for Win32: A good LUG meeting topic?

2008-03-19 Thread Ben Scott
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 9:49 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Does anyone here think that Writing FOSS applications for Win32 would be a good presentation topic for a LUG meeting? I do, and would also be interested for myself. It even has potential to be a good outreach event, attracting a

Re: Writing FOSS for Win32: A good LUG meeting topic?

2008-03-19 Thread Thomas Charron
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 10:26 AM, Tech Writer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: * Even though the machine came with a DVD/RW drive, there was no DVD writing software. I was initially going to add RecordNow, which is on the other Win machines, but then found a product called DVD Flick that did the

Good FOSS Win32 apps (was: Writing FOSS for Win32...)

2008-03-19 Thread Ben Scott
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 10:26 AM, Tech Writer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Right away, we set up Firefox as the default browser, and added OpenOffice for her school work. Good choices, both. * Last week, she needed to remove red eye from one of her photos. We installed GIMP, but

Re: Writing FOSS for Win32: A good LUG meeting topic?

2008-03-19 Thread Ben Scott
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 10:42 AM, Thomas Charron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sidenote, but.. It's running Windows XP, it can write/record a data DVD or CD. I've never gotten the built-in CD writer feature of Win XP to work for DVDs of any kind. CDs, yah, but not DVDs. That said, XP's

Re: Good FOSS Win32 apps (was: Writing FOSS for Win32...)

2008-03-19 Thread David J Berube
Ben Scott wrote: Notepad++ is a capable and extensible text-editor that's great when you want something better than Windows Notepad, but still want something Windows-like in nature (and not just Emacs for Windows (not that there is anything wrong with Emacs for Windows (I've used it

Re: Writing FOSS for Win32: A good LUG meeting topic?

2008-03-19 Thread David J Berube
Back in the day, I vaguely recall using a win32 build of mkisofs and cdrecord to do CD backups via a script. Nontrivial for beginners, but it does work. Take it easy, David Berube Berube Consulting [EMAIL PROTECTED] (603)-485-9622 http://www.berubeconsulting.com/ Ben Scott wrote: On Wed, Mar

RE: Setting up separate network question

2008-03-19 Thread Labitt, Bruce
Good analysis. I'll go check this out. One of the reasons originally given to me was they did not want the possibility of ever having a DHCP server [mine] getting attached to the corporate network. I don't blame them, but I would think there are alternate ways to ensure this. I've marked up

Re: Setting up separate network question

2008-03-19 Thread Tom Buskey
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 11:01 AM, Labitt, Bruce [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Good analysis. I'll go check this out. One of the reasons originally given to me was they did not want the possibility of ever having a DHCP server [mine] getting attached to the corporate network. I don't blame

Re: Writing FOSS for Win32: A good LUG meeting topic?

2008-03-19 Thread Tech Writer
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 10:42 AM, Thomas Charron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sidenote, but.. It's running Windows XP, it can write/record a data DVD or CD. I've never gotten the built-in CD writer feature of Win XP to work for DVDs of any kind. CDs, yah, but not DVDs. That said,

Re: Setting up separate network question

2008-03-19 Thread Ben Scott
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 11:01 AM, Labitt, Bruce [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: One of the reasons originally given to me was they did not want the possibility of ever having a DHCP server [mine] getting attached to the corporate network. A rogue DHCP server can wreck all sorts of havoc on to a

Re: Good FOSS Win32 apps (was: Writing FOSS for Win32...)

2008-03-19 Thread Ben Scott
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 10:59 AM, David J Berube [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: FileZilla is a great FTP/SFTP client. Works great on Linux as well. As do 7-Zip, GIMP, Inkscape, Scribus, and WireShark. One benefit of FOSS -- which I suspect is often under-sold/appreciated -- is that

re: server uptime

2008-03-19 Thread Warren Luebkeman
I am curious how common it is for peoples servers to go extremely long periods of time without crashing/reboot. Our server, running Debian Sarge, which serves our email/web/backups/dns/etc has been running 733 days (two years) without a reboot. Its in an 4U IBM chassis with dual power

re: server uptime

2008-03-19 Thread Alex Hewitt
On Wed, 2008-03-19 at 13:50 -0400, Warren Luebkeman wrote: I am curious how common it is for peoples servers to go extremely long periods of time without crashing/reboot. Our server, running Debian Sarge, which serves our email/web/backups/dns/etc has been running 733 days (two years)

Re: server uptime

2008-03-19 Thread Jerry Feldman
On Wed, 19 Mar 2008 14:32:54 -0400 Alex Hewitt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In my experience the stability of any system has to do with it's usage. With servers running programs that are reasonably stable up time will certainly be many months and can stretch into years. Any system that for

Re: server uptime

2008-03-19 Thread Ben Scott
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 1:50 PM, Warren Luebkeman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Our server, running Debian Sarge, which serves our email/web/backups/dns/etc has been running 733 days (two years) without a reboot. You're obviously not installing all your security updates, then. Both the 2.4 and 2.6

4?th annual mit spam conference.

2008-03-19 Thread Steven W. Orr
If anyone is interested. I've always enjoyed this one. http://www.spamconference.org/ Thanks to our MIT contacts (and to satisfy popular demand) we will now have a TWO DAY conference, on March 27 and 28, 2008 , (thursday and friday) on campus at MIT in Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA. On

Re: server uptime

2008-03-19 Thread Jarod Wilson
On Mar 19, 2008, at 3:36 PM, Ben Scott wrote: On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 1:50 PM, Warren Luebkeman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Our server, running Debian Sarge, which serves our email/web/ backups/dns/etc has been running 733 days (two years) without a reboot. You're obviously not installing

Re: server uptime

2008-03-19 Thread Warren Luebkeman
Sounds like someone is insecure about their uptime... ;-) I do understand your point thought. - Original Message - From: Ben Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Greater NH Linux User Group gnhlug-discuss@mail.gnhlug.org Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2008 3:36:59 PM (GMT-0500) America/New_York

Re: server uptime

2008-03-19 Thread brk-gnhlug
Yes, Ben is trying to say that it's not the length of your uptime, but how you use it. No one is buying it though. Warren Luebkeman wrote: Sounds like someone is insecure about their uptime... ;-) I do understand your point thought. ___

Re: server uptime

2008-03-19 Thread David J Berube
Got to agree with Ben here. While it's bad if a server can't go 24 hours due to an OS-level problem, it's also inaccurate to say that a long uptime implies high service availability. This is doubly so if you are hosting software: not only does your service need to be available, but it needs to

Re: Good FOSS Win32 apps (was: Writing FOSS for Win32...)

2008-03-19 Thread Shawn O'Shea
On 3/19/08, Ben Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 10:59 AM, David J Berube [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: FileZilla is a great FTP/SFTP client. Works great on Linux as well. Another image editing option is Paint.NET. It's an MIT licensed image editing app designed in

Re: server uptime

2008-03-19 Thread Warren Luebkeman
There is no question continuity of service is more important than uptime alone. I guess I'm just being a rube, addmittantly so, because I'm impressed that a system could run for two years straight without failing, notwithstanding the big picture of service availability. I guess my only

Re: server uptime

2008-03-19 Thread Ben Scott
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 5:01 PM, Warren Luebkeman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm impressed that a system could run for two years straight without failing ... Ah. Well... that gets old after awhile. :) At the extreme end of the scale, old school IBM mainframe systems can measure service

Re: server uptime

2008-03-19 Thread Mark E. Mallett
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 08:23:14PM -0400, Ben Scott wrote: And let's not forget that Linux isn't immune to restart-the-world issues, either. For example, on a Linux server, if you update glibc to patch a security bug, you pretty much need to restart *everything*. sometimes it's good to

Re: server uptime

2008-03-19 Thread dan
Mark E. Mallett wrote: On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 08:23:14PM -0400, Ben Scott wrote: And let's not forget that Linux isn't immune to restart-the-world issues, either. For example, on a Linux server, if you update glibc to patch a security bug, you pretty much need to restart *everything*.