On 27/05/11 01:28, Florian Müllner wrote:
Hi,
2011/5/27 mart-e
I've found a reference about the line X-GNOME-Keywords in the
.desktop files which seems to contain keywords while searching for
an application.
http://mail.gnome.org/archives/gnome-i18n/2010-November/msg00096.html
On Mon, 2011-05-23 at 12:05 +0100, Martin Häsler wrote:
Am I the only one to think, that the Close button should be on the left
side?
Wrong. Close button should be on the side user prefers it.
IOW: it should be configurable.
The insane:
Suspend/Shutdown:
I think this is the first
The whole argument for not having Power Off as a visible option in the menu
seems to boil down to cultural convention. And I hope everyone here
understands that people do things in different ways in different cultures.
Sometimes people even do things differently than the local convention.
You
The only real cultural mismatch I think exists here is what the right
response is to do if the user gets confused by a menu that says:
Suspend
Hibernate
Power Off
Restart
Is the right thing to do to provide training for the user, or is the
right thing to do to improve the user interface?
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 8:44 AM, Owen Taylor otay...@redhat.com wrote:
The only real cultural mismatch I think exists here is what the right
response is to do if the user gets confused by a menu that says:
Suspend
Hibernate
Power Off
Restart
Is the right thing to do to provide
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 2:07 AM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
(This is actually one area where the kernel folks and distros - like us!
- seriously need to pull their finger out and either fix up the current
hibernate code, or swallow their pride and merge in either tuxonice or
On Fri, 2011-05-27 at 08:53 -0700, Diego Fernandez wrote:
Well then couldn't there just be a 'Power Off' and 'Suspend' option in
the menu then? That doesn't seem too confusing... Suspend = I'll be
back in a bit and want to get back to what I was doing. Power Off =
I'm done for a while and
On 05/27/11 17:12, Owen Taylor wrote:
On Fri, 2011-05-27 at 08:53 -0700, Diego Fernandez wrote:
Well then couldn't there just be a 'Power Off' and 'Suspend' option in
the menu then? That doesn't seem too confusing... Suspend = I'll be
back in a bit and want to get back to what I was doing.
Please feel free to crunch the numbers, because I've got not idea, what
you are talking of.
Also a computer takes 10 seconds to power off, how is that a lot of time
?
And of course it is not reasonable at all to suspend when back in a bit
means tomorrow.
That is a waste of energy and
On 5/26/2011 5:51 PM, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
(e) there is an extension available [in at least the openSUSE GNOME3
STABLE repo] that adds Suspend Power Off as discreet items on the
menu.
@Adam:
Perhaps one of your audience is not system admins/power users(users of
tweak* extensions).
Unity is not gnome shell. It is an Ubuntu project, and they own they copyright
to all the source code. Gnome shell is the official gnome desktop, which is
much better IMHO. If you don't like that, gnome classic is still available and
supported. This list is for questions and concerns
Hi,
I wanted to say that I really love GNOME 3, nice work all. :)
One thing I'm missing is a way to get windows out of the way when I don't want
to work with them. For instance, I keep Evolution running 100% of the time but
only check it every now and then. Same with Banshee, it's always
My bad, but the fact remains that minimizing a window will change
nothing in overview.
My point was more that you have to reconsider your workflow instead of
trying to retrieve a feature that's becoming less useful.
On Fri, 2011-05-27 at 20:19 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2011-05-27 at
13 matches
Mail list logo