Lucas Bonnet [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Richard Stallman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
You're wrong, EMMS is indeed a GNU project.
It seems that EMMS is a GNU package--a separate one.
I will look at the situation with EMMS and mplayer.
What do you mean by situation? EMMS supports several
Richard Stallman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It occurs to me that it would be more general to repeat the next or
previous command at a given interval. If what you want to repeat is
a keyboard macro, then you type a command to run the keyboard macro.
True, that would be more general.
It is
Hey Tamas,
this patch adds a new buffer type with actions to switch or pop to it,
just displaying it or killing it.
--8---cut here---start-8---
diff -u /home/heimdall/elisp/anything.el.orig /home/heimdall/elisp/anything.el
---
and perhaps you're missing some of the subtlety of david's point: if
mplayer did not support non-free codecs, some (many) people wouldn't even
consider giving GNU/Linux a try.
This is exactly what I mentioned in my previous message. The mplayer
approach sacrifices the appreciation of
The difference between Richard's and your perspective is that your
approach is possibly focusing more on the usability issues and
allowing users to benefit from a free platform while still being
able to access proprietary content as easily as users of closed
proprietary
For executing previous command I did some investigation and looked up
how `repeat' does it and it was way too complicated to me with a lot
of handling of special cases.
We could move some of that code to a subroutine which you could call.
That should be pretty straightforward.
Having
The non-free codecs that I'm talking about are the ones that are
binary-only (or those that have non-free licenses; but I am not sure
that case occurs). I don't see any ethical problem in distributing
programs that are patented or illegal in certain countries, as long
as
It seems that EMMS is a GNU package--a separate one.
I will look at the situation with EMMS and mplayer.
What do you mean by situation?
It means, the relevant facts. I don't want to reach a premature
conclusion.
Which means that EMMS tries mpg321 (for mp3s), ogg123 (for ogg
The fact a piece of free software allows you to use non-free
software/codecs in itself is not an issue. Rather its the extent
to which it facilitates doing so that is of concern. the FSF isn't
so ideological as to try and ban the use of free software - if
they were, you
