OK, this is going to be annoying!
در November 10, 2019 9:29:31 PM UTC، Richard Stallman نوشت:
>[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider]]]
>[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
>[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow
Is this not a threat to the whole GNU-GPL system?
grsecurity.org
grsecurity.net
Unlike the manual, ad-hoc approach to finding and fixing Spectre v1
vulnerabilities employed elsewhere, our much higher coverage Respectre®
compiler plugin discovers and automatically instruments the code with
RMS could do it, remember he did the first version of GCC in a week.
Also I get the impression that, for many people, gnu (and programming
for the FSF) is used as "babys first coding job", while RMS is a true
wizard programmer.
It would be better in his hands. You get what you pay for: when
To actually get the game to run, no matter what, on nearly ANY GNU+Linux
distro:
I suggest you simply execute: [ wine xonotic.exe]
The engine source is in darkplaces-AESCrypto-linux.zip
In /source/ this is pointed out.
That is where you find the info on how to compile the engine correctly
The source is all included, stop being a retard.
No I am not going to rewrite the fucking game because you don't like 3d.
FUCK you.
See the zip file containing the engine source? Figure it out moron. All
you have to do is compile the engine (and supply your distro's crypto
libs to the engine).
RMS: The GCC website lists these now-proprietary plugins. Exactly what
you did not want to happen has happened.
https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/plugins
grsecurity kernel -- Plugins to help with the task of creating a more
secure kernel. -- https://www.grsecurity.net/features.php#tabs-gcc LWN
On 2019-11-11 22:29, Alexandre François Garreau wrote:
It’s not for me. It’s for you. You first talked about GNU’s lack of
empire
game.
I was just responding to RMS' 1983 email announcement of GNU, which I
had read recently as an image. I was saying: hey, here's one: you can do
those
Remember when Non Disclosure Agreements were used to restrict sharing
software: and you refused to sign them, and started the whole movement.
What [Open Source Security] is doing is constructively the same thing,
and has the exact same bad effect. It's just history repeating itself.
Before
I agree with this. Even if it's not RMS, Hurd development has stalled and it
would be really nice if a few people got back to developing it. Like many of
the people in those threads, I fear the direction Linux is going in.
Nov 11, 2019, 05:24 by nipponm...@firemail.cc:
> [I think this is
