Github is "software development as social media".
Thus all you have is backbiting and gossip as 90% of the "development".
Additionally Microsoft encouraged the additions of additional writings
alongside the licenses such as "Codes of Conduct."
So now you have your licenses (maybe), and then
After microsoft puchased Github, they encouraged "Codes of Conduct".
So now 40k "opensource projects" hace CoC's.
Obviously men won't be contributing to said projects, other than the
people allready in them.
On 2019-11-27 10:02, Jean Louis wrote:
* Nala Ginrut [2019-11-20 09:03]:
> Why
Well, The God Father said:"Never hate your enemies. It affects your
judgment." ;-)
Best regards.
Jean Louis writes:
> For Microsoft I judge by previous pattern, fur example using GNU system in
> Windows and never calling it neither GNU neither putting attention to free
> software.
>
>
IIRC, the most famous case is Farecast, which was aquired by M$ with a
high price 110M dollars then just shutdown because its data source was
controlled by Google.
I guess if free software affect GitHub so much, then they will shutdown
it without a hesitation.
Best regards.
Alexandre François
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
GitHub's encouragement of sloppy licensing, no licensing, or licensing
under only a
Le mercredi 27 novembre 2019, 11:02:16 CET Jean Louis a écrit :
> Most logical to me is that they have long term to kill Github just
> like Google does with various competitive companies, please see
> https://killedbygoogle.com/
This website doesn’t list at all competitive companies bought or
I don't think this is entirely the case. Even though many people would migrate
to gitlab or other services, countless projects that are no longer being
maintained or not very active would be lost.
Nov 27, 2019, 10:19 by g...@adamspiers.org:
> On Wed, 27 Nov 2019 at 10:02, Jean Louis <>
For Microsoft I judge by previous pattern, fur example using GNU system in
Windows and never calling it neither GNU neither putting attention to free
software.
Pattern of users abuse increased over time at that company. I can't get away of
my prejudices based on history.
On November 28, 2019
* Nala Ginrut [2019-11-20 09:03]:
> > Why Windows sucks:
> > https://itvision.altervista.org/why-windows-10-sucks.html
>
> Yeah, I've shared this article in my last company, it's a good post.
>
> Microsoft takes the honor of FOSS nowadays, everyone praise them just
> like they're leading the
On Wed, 27 Nov 2019 at 10:02, Jean Louis wrote:
> I don't trust Microsoft anything. If they purchased Github, it was not
> for reason to foster free software. It is apparent reason, why should
> they be doing that. Let us think logical.
>
> Most logical to me is that they have long term to kill
Adam Spiers writes:
> Killing GitHub would actually help Free Software, because then most
> Free Software projects on there would migrate to GitLab and other
> more free git hosting platforms. That already happened to a smaller
> extent when Microsoft bought GitHub; there was a noticeable
11 matches
Mail list logo
