Re: [k9mail/k-9] Makes PGP sign-only mails very difficult (#2375)

2019-02-06 Thread Werner Koch
[Please don't cross-post!] On Tue, 5 Feb 2019 12:47, gnupg-users@gnupg.org said: > THE DATE PROBLEM. Only the body of the email is signed, not the > envelope headers, namely the subject and intended recipients, and Sure, mail headers are subject to changes. For example by mailing list

Re: [k9mail/k-9] Makes PGP sign-only mails very difficult (#2375)

2019-02-05 Thread vedaal via Gnupg-users
On 2/5/2019 at 4:50 PM, "justina colmena via Gnupg-users" wrote:>THE DATE PROBLEM. Only the body of the email is signed, not the envelope headers, namely the subject and intended >recipients, and probably most importantly, the date. It would be nice to have an option to automatically include

Re: [k9mail/k-9] Makes PGP sign-only mails very difficult (#2375)

2019-02-05 Thread justina colmena via Gnupg-users
On February 4, 2019 8:07:33 AM AKST, Citizen Kepler wrote: >I would like to say that I need to have a signature on all of the >emails that I send to authenticate me as the sender, but not encrypt >them. Often these messages are going back into bug tracking systems or >mailing lists, and