Revising Its Double-Talk (But Remains
Fully Green)
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 9:12 AM, Laurent Romary laurent.rom...@inria.fr
mailto:laurent.rom...@inria.fr wrote:
With all respect, Stevan, I am not sure it is worth answering publishers'
policy tricks with deposit hacks. The core question
With all respect, Stevan, I am not sure it is worth answering publishers'
policy tricks with deposit hacks. The core question is: does Elsevier fulfills,
by making such statements, its duties as service provider in the domain of
scholarly communication. If not, we, as institutions, have to be
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 8:12 AM, Laurent Romary laurent.rom...@inria.frwrote:
With all respect, Stevan, I am not sure it is worth answering publishers'
policy tricks with deposit hacks. The core question is: does Elsevier
fulfills, by making such statements, its duties as service provider in
: Elsevier Keeps Revising Its Double-Talk (But Remains Fully
Green)
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 8:12 AM, Laurent Romary
laurent.rom...@inria.frmailto:laurent.rom...@inria.fr wrote:
With all respect, Stevan, I am not sure it is worth answering publishers'
policy tricks with deposit hacks. The core
Thanks Fred,
At one level it is true that we get the contracts we deserve, but only if
the issues are known. And the #scholarlypoor does not get the contracts it
deserves.
Peter's complaint that libraries do not challenge use or re-use clauses
in contracts is not absolutely true,
I give two
Friend, Fred writes
I am sorry to be cynical, but the academic community gets the
contracts it deserves. We have to learn to say no and really mean
it.
Say no to what? And how will you make sure what you say is matched
by what you do?
--
Cheers,
Thomas Krichel
As a reminder, here is how at least some of us academics are saying no to
Elsevier, the Cost of Knowledge boycott:
http://thecostofknowledge.com/
Signing on to and then acting on the San Francisco Declaration on Research
Assessment is a good step to push back against the impact factor game
Heather Morrison writes
As a reminder, here is how at least some of us academics are saying
no to Elsevier, the Cost of Knowledge boycott:
http://thecostofknowledge.com/
Individual academics have little incentives to carry out a threat
like this. And this is specific to Elsevier when
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 9:12 AM, Laurent Romary laurent.rom...@inria.frwrote:
With all respect, Stevan, I am not sure it is worth answering publishers'
policy tricks with deposit hacks. The core question is: does Elsevier
fulfill, by making such statements, its duties as service provider in
