On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 1:34 PM, Michael Hermus michael.her...@gmail.comwrote:
Excellent, thanks! One question though: isn't there an issue similar
to the HRD 'Eventual Consistency' with the Task Queue? In other words,
there is a variable latency between queue insert and lease
availability
Indeed!
For each unit of work:
-Write work to Pull queue with tag=BatchID
-Write named 'fan-in' task to Push Queue for execution batch period ms
in the future, containing the BatchID
Example:
http://code.google.com/p/8-bits/source/browse/trunk/backend/main.py#168
When the named task
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 2:06 PM, Bing blackice@gmail.com wrote:
In the google io talk, data join is implemented by Append method. But
it seems the Append method is only to append lists together. Is that
Append method just a high-level concept or is there an implementation?
Also, join can
name,
please:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zSDC_TU7rtc#t=41m35
Regards
J. Záruba
2010/6/7 Jaroslav Záruba jaroslav.zar...@gmail.com
Hello
I'm reading through the PDF that Brett Slatkin has published for %subj
%.
http://tinyurl.com/3523mej
In the video (the Fan
with the seq.number the key would be only
32B. (Still quite huge though.)
Given how frequent a vote entity is I would like to have the keys as short
as possible.
Regards
J. Záruba
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 11:21 PM, Brett Slatkin brett-appeng...@google.com
wrote:
Hey all,
The int
Is there any google staff who is responsible for GAE promotion and
technology to say something here?
How can I access to my Google Apps via my own domain directly, e.g.
how can access via mail.my_domain.com instead of mail.google.com/a/
my_domain.com?
One way to address this is to run a
The problem is that there are no simple server-side handlers that come
with GWT. Instead, I like using the Hermes/Lovely JSON bindings:
http://code.google.com/p/lovely-gwt-jsonrpc/
This lets you implement a GWT backend with any server-side technology
that can handle JSON-RPC:
Hey Everyone,
Just wanted to point out something cool that's going on with App
Engine right now:
http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/09/03/24/Open-for-Questions-President-Obama-to-Answer-Your-Questions-on-Thursday/
http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2009/03/citizen-participation-that-scales-call.html
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 5:22 PM, Lawrence Fitzpatrick
fitzp...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mar 18, 2:58 pm, Brett Slatkin brett-appeng...@google.com wrote:
In the future, customers should be notified 48 hours
in advance of any detected abuse.
Wow. I knew you guys were good, now I'm really
Heyo,
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 7:16 PM, cz czer...@gmail.com wrote:
Actually, that is normal behavior. This has been discussed in previous
threads.
GAE seems to aggressively purge it's app cache, average app lifetime
appears to be under 2 seconds. Appengine-patch may be marginally
faster but
Heyo,
Good finds, peterk!
pubsubhubbub uses some of the same techniques that Jaiku uses for
doing one-to-many fan-out of status message updates. The migration is
underway as we speak
(http://www.jaiku.com/blog/2009/03/11/upcoming-service-break/). I
believe the code should be available very
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 8:39 AM, Chris chris1...@gmail.com wrote:
If my app has a lot of data in memcache, and calls flush_all() now,
what about the performance of this function call? I'm not sure how the
memcache backend is implemented.
Like all memcache calls, flush is O(1). Everything is
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 12:47 AM, Bemmu bemmu@gmail.com wrote:
Just wanted to confirm that this issue went away, and is working great
now! I did make some changes, but not any change which would seem to
affect scalability. Only major change was that a big percentage of my
calls was
site-wide --
otherwise, it would make perfect sense. How is a handler identified as
high-cpu? How long does that classification last?
Thanks,
--Nick (app id: skrit)
On Mar 3, 1:25 pm, Brett Slatkin brett-appeng...@google.com wrote:
Hi Nick,
On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 8:55 AM, Nick Winter
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 2:56 AM, cz czer...@gmail.com wrote:
Latency is still pretty much killing our site. Dynamic pages that took
1-3 seconds (which is bad enough) before the slowdown still take 10-20
seconds. The app dashboard is super sluggish as well (as Nick pointed
out). I'm hoping
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 11:19 AM, Alex Popescu
the.mindstorm.mailingl...@gmail.com wrote:
Comparing the Datastore metrics for yesterday and today, I'd say that
the Datastore is still having latency problems on most of the
operations.
I'd also have to point out that the System status does NOT
Hi Artem,
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 1:43 PM, Artem p.ar...@gmail.com wrote:
Again, why does the status http://code.google.com/status/appengine
show normal?
Over the course of the day the Status Site has shown anomaly
multiple times, but it has not yet exceeded the disruption
threshold. We will
Hi Nick,
On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 8:55 AM, Nick Winter livel...@gmail.com wrote:
http://code.google.com/status/appengine/detail/serving/2009/03/03#ae-trust-detail-helloworld-get-latency
Just about every day for the past several weeks, there's been elevated
latency like this, usually at
Hi Alex,
We're aware of elevated Serving and Datastore latencies and are
working hard to rectify the situation. We're very sorry for any
trouble this is causing your application and others. Thanks for your
patience.
-Brett
On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 12:39 PM, Alex Popescu
Hey there,
At launch, Brazil and Hong Kong were not in our list of supported
countries for billing. I'm happy to announce that application
administrators in these countries may now purchase additional
resources for App Engine. Thanks for your patience!
-Brett
Google App Engine Team
Hi Andy,
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 8:12 AM, Andy Freeman ana...@earthlink.net wrote:
Is there any way for an application to know that it's run into quota
problems or, better yet, where it is wrt usage.
This would be useful for applications that have some flexibility in
how they behave (some
Hi there,
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 5:59 PM, pedepy paul.ro...@gmail.com wrote:
hey all. Although my app is far from complete, I thought Id do a
little early 'load testing' to see what it would look like.
I had noticed awful big cpu usage times, usually anywhere between
1100ms to 5000ms on
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 8:09 AM, peterk peter.ke...@gmail.com wrote:
Maybe I'm misunderstanding you, but since when was it free to run a
EC2 instance?
EC2 Small Instance per CPU Hour is $0.10 (same as GAE's cost 'per CPU
hour')
EC2 outgoing bandwidth is $0.17 per GB for the first Terabyte
CPU
current quota - 46 hours
new quota - 1 hour
% change - 98% reduction
I believe the new number will be 6.5 CPU hours:
http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/quotas.html#Free_Changes
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed
Hi Bill,
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 1:28 PM, Bill billk...@gmail.com wrote:
There seems to be an inconsistency in the cited storage pricing. The
blog post says $0.15/GB/mo, but the docs and my app dashboard say
$0.005/GB/mo, which is a huge drop in pricing if correct.
Which one is correct?
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 1:53 PM, Bill billk...@gmail.com wrote:
On Feb 24, 1:44 pm, Jeff S j...@google.com wrote:
Were do you see $0.005/GB/mo? On the settings page and Dashboard we're
showing the *daily* cost per GB, since that is how we compute actual
cost. 30 * 0.005 = $0.15GB/day.
I
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 2:24 PM, Andy Freeman ana...@earthlink.net wrote:
I hope that 30 * 0.005 = $0.15GB/day. should have been 30 * 0.005 =
$0.15GB/month.
Wow yeah, sorry about that.
30 days * $0.005 per Gigabyte per day = $0.15 per Gigabyte per month
We're updating the docs to remove
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 2:27 PM, Brett Slatkin
brett-appeng...@google.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 2:24 PM, Andy Freeman ana...@earthlink.net wrote:
I hope that 30 * 0.005 = $0.15GB/day. should have been 30 * 0.005 =
$0.15GB/month.
Wow yeah, sorry about that.
30 days * $0.005 per
Hi Alexander,
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 9:42 PM, Alexander Vasiljev
a.a.vasil...@gmail.com wrote:
Please read the following GAE feature request:
http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=1078
Share your thoughts and consider to support (star) it.
I think this idea makes sense;
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 1:19 PM, Peter Blazejewicz
peter.blazejew...@gmail.com wrote:
hi all,
I'm testing application locally (Development/1.0 server/Mac OS X/
Python 2.5) and want to be sure of one thing:
- even if both User-Agent/Accept-Encoding headers are specified in
request as in:
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 9:59 AM, Cesium cesiumpic...@gmail.com wrote:
Marzia in this thread has already said they dont offer any guarantees.
Is Marzia a primary source?
Yes, Marzia is part of the app engine team.
I'm hosed.
Cesium,
What algorithm are you trying to implement that
On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 10:29 AM, Greg Temchenko soid@gmail.com wrote:
I have the same trouble with russian locale. I tried to use 'ru',
'ru_RU', and 'ru_RU.UTF-8' and everytime I get the message locale not
supported.
I have no idea. It seems GAE supports locale not well...
On Dec 31
32 matches
Mail list logo
