[Google Maps API v3] Re: For 300+ markers, should I use MsAccess, KLM or Google Fusion Tables?

I think that url should be: http://home.provide.net/~bratliff/polycluster/airports/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Maps JavaScript API v3 group. To post to this group, send email to google-maps-js-api-v3@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from

[Google Maps API v3] Re: For 300+ markers, should I use MsAccess, KLM or Google Fusion Tables?

Fusion tables produce image tiles. CANVAS tiles provide similar performance without the limitations. Their shapes are clickable. Their styles can be changed quickly, easily, dynamically. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Maps JavaScript API v3

[Google Maps API v3] Re: For 300+ markers, should I use MsAccess, KLM or Google Fusion Tables?

so, CANVAS tiles don't have the limitations. Which is nice! Seems to be better than Fusion tables. I don't have a clue what you are talking about. I don't yet get what Fusion tables is. See the following demo: http://www/polylib.us/polycluster/airports with several thousand light

[Google Maps API v3] Re: For 300+ markers, should I use MsAccess, KLM or Google Fusion Tables?

Lars, I just tried the Fusion Tables, it is ABSOLUTELY the fastest thing possible. visit http://www.google.com/fusiontables/ and start messing around. I uploaded my data, had 3816 markers mapped just about instantly. I'm not 100% sure how it all works and what the best way to implement it in a

[Google Maps API v3] Re: For 300+ markers, should I use MsAccess, KLM or Google Fusion Tables?

When publishing it to my website only the map but no markers displayed. The icon image you have asked for doesn't exist on your host Function SetMarkers() seems not to start. It does run, but places 300 invisible markers -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google

[Google Maps API v3] Re: For 300+ markers, should I use MsAccess, KLM or Google Fusion Tables?

´Thanks Rossko!! Beginner's mistake. Forgot to upload the marker files... So, OK, Problem 1 fixed! /LarsM -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Maps JavaScript API v3 group. To post to this group, send email to

[Google Maps API v3] Re: For 300+ markers, should I use MsAccess, KLM or Google Fusion Tables?

If you're using asp.net you may have hit the json serialization size limit, happened to me. Edit your web.config file to set a larger size limit, it should be there already but commented out and looks like this jsonSerialization maxJsonLength=200 -- You received this message

Re: [Google Maps API v3] Re: For 300+ markers, should I use MsAccess, KLM or Google Fusion Tables?

On line 334: ['Sthlm Skeppsbron', 559.3228459.32284, 18.07559, '/ImageArchive_Thn/060718_4801_ZumFransiskaner.jpg' , 0 ] The first coordinate is whack. Two decimal points (and I suspect the first one is not correctly placed either:) Tip, while developing, use Google Chrome and right-click the

Re: [Google Maps API v3] Re: For 300+ markers, should I use MsAccess, KLM or Google Fusion Tables?

Thanks Marco !! I was so obsessed by the number 300 that I did not see that the data on that line was whacked. It is now corrected, and 'Map326' now shows all 362 markers! Wonderful! :-) *(God, internet/usenet is the greatest invention of mankind! What did we do without it?)* So -

[Google Maps API v3] Re: For 300+ markers, should I use MsAccess, KLM or Google Fusion Tables?

Thanks Clarkie! I am still in classic ASP but going into ASP.Net. I will remember this! /LarsM -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Maps JavaScript API v3 group. To post to this group, send email to google-maps-js-api-v3@googlegroups.com. To