GWT Super dev mode not detecting changes in inherited modules

2016-06-04 Thread Ahmad Bawaneh
ao if i switch i should be able to do that. is there any example?! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.

GWT Super dev mode not detecting changes in inherited modules

2016-06-04 Thread Ahmad Bawaneh
Hi I am using GWT with maven, my attempt is to run my main gwt application through mvn gwt:run to startup a code server to use the super dev mode fast compile during development. my application is written as many seperate projects and these project being gwt module are inherited by the main

Re: GWT Super dev mode not detecting changes in inherited modules

2016-06-26 Thread Ahmad Bawaneh
i cant get this to work, i used the archtype modular-webapp to create a new application, and i was able to to run the application using super dev mode as instructed in the github page, every thing so far worked as expected, i changed something in the entry point of the client module entry point

Global Event bus for separate compilation modules

2016-04-24 Thread Ahmad Bawaneh
Dears, is there any way to build an event bus that can fire events and these events to be handled by handler in another module that is compiled separately and included inside the html as a script. Thanks -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT Users"

GWT JSIterop

2016-04-24 Thread Ahmad Bawaneh
Hi All, is there any sample for using JsInterop to make communication between GWT module compiled each on its own? i think this will be a good idea to start implementing client side plugins and modularity. thanks -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups

UiBinder alternative

2016-09-08 Thread Ahmad Bawaneh
Hi Is there any plans or suggestions for the UiBinder alternatives since UiBinder will be removed from GWT 3.0? and i wonder why such cool feature should be removed instead of being updated to match the new changes? Thanks. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google

Re: UiBinder alternative

2016-09-08 Thread Ahmad Bawaneh
On Thursday, September 8, 2016 at 4:41:43 PM UTC+3, Thomas Broyer wrote: > > > > On Thursday, September 8, 2016 at 3:00:36 PM UTC+2, Ahmad Bawaneh wrote: >> >> Hi >> Is there any plans or suggestions for the UiBinder alternatives since >> UiBinder will be

Re: UiBinder alternative

2016-09-08 Thread Ahmad Bawaneh
ahead. I might be wrong but this is what i think. On Thursday, September 8, 2016 at 4:41:43 PM UTC+3, Thomas Broyer wrote: > > > > On Thursday, September 8, 2016 at 3:00:36 PM UTC+2, Ahmad Bawaneh wrote: >> >> Hi >> Is there any plans or suggestions for the UiBinder a

Replcaing GWT generators with APT - Annotation Processing Tool -

2016-10-07 Thread Ahmad Bawaneh
Dears, We all know that GTW 3.0 will come with some major changes from the current GWT, and so we find every were suggestions for how to be prepared for these changes, and that is good, but here is my issue regarding the removal of generators and the suggestion to replace them with Annotation

How to slide out a panel (similar to gwtproject.org front page)

2017-12-01 Thread Ahmad Bawaneh
Why not to checkout the gwt project site and see how it is done there? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to

Re: Future of GWT

2018-05-10 Thread Ahmad Bawaneh
GWT has a Brilliant Future, While GWT 2.x will still receive a long term support, GWT 3 is moving forward faster than ever now, and it also going to ensure a smooth migration path from GWT 2.x. We as a community now have taken the driver seat, and since then the state of GWT 3 is moving faster

Re: Future of GWT

2018-05-17 Thread Ahmad Bawaneh
recently we upgraded one of our applications that has around 300k LOC from gwt-2.5.1 and old gwt maven plugin to gwt-2.8.2 and tbroyer maven plugin, the upgrade went almost smooth and we had no issues with codeserver. the only issues we had were related to old version of GXT having classes not

Re: GWT JSON-B

2018-05-20 Thread Ahmad Bawaneh
Thank you Nándor Előd Fekete for pointing out to my gwt-jackson-apt lib, i would like also to add that my lib is using Annotation processors instead of reflection and generators, and you can also use the same object mapper for both client side and server side, i would really love to have any

Re: Future of GWT

2018-05-20 Thread Ahmad Bawaneh
according to my experience codeserver issues happens when client and server dependencies are mixed up, one good way to solve such mix is split the code into client and server module as it is in the default project created by tbroyer gwt modular webapp

Re: GWT JSON-B

2018-05-20 Thread Ahmad Bawaneh
As long as you can limit your classes to jstypes - double, arrays, jsDate ...etc- this could be the right choice, but when the classes are shared with the server you might end up with JsType for each bean in the server, or you can use a lib that allows you to share the bean between the client

Announcing Jackson APT for both client side and Server side

2018-01-11 Thread Ahmad Bawaneh
Dear GWTers I am glad to announce the latest jackson-apt that provide support for using the same mapper instance on both client side and server side, finally you can annotate the type in the shared module and generate a mapper into the shared module and use it in both client code and server

Re: Domino-ui typesafe material design ui without Js dependencies

2018-07-15 Thread Ahmad Bawaneh
go#datatable for discussions and questions please join our gitter channel at https://gitter.im/domino-gwt/domino-ui <https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-by4JKyuDDBU/W0st8dEbtDI/WKE/Kp_aY5RKFDQqVcm2YR7UgFqrg1dGvJmhACLcBGAs/s1600/data-table.gif> On Sunday, March 18, 2018 at 10:07:53 PM UTC+2, A

Re: Elemento, maven config to force template implementation class regen

2018-03-26 Thread Ahmad Bawaneh
try *mvn process-sources* On Monday, March 26, 2018 at 10:19:26 AM UTC+2, Rob Newton wrote: > > Hi, > > When I edit an Elemento template HTML file and do a mvn compile it won't > regenerate the template implementation class source file. Is there some > maven pom config and/or command I can

Domino-ui typesafe material design ui without Js dependencies

2018-03-18 Thread Ahmad Bawaneh
I am glad to announce the new Domino-ui, a typesafe material-design with bootstrap for java developers with #GWT that has no dependency on jquery or external Js. https://github.com/vegegoku/domino-ui Discussions and feedback are very welcome here or on

Domino-ui new sample

2018-10-07 Thread Ahmad Bawaneh
Hi This amazing TODO app was built using the amazing #dominoui Checkout #dominodo at http://bit.ly/dominodo and our lib #dominoui at http://bit.ly/domino-ui our demo app at http://bit.ly/domino-ui-demo join the chat at http://bit.ly/domino-ui-gitter [image: Selection_077.png] -- You

Re: GWT Future plan: CompletableFuture ?

2018-11-16 Thread Ahmad Bawaneh
why it should be?! why not use it as a stand alone lib? we already do. On Friday, November 16, 2018 at 4:55:16 PM UTC+2, Michael Joyner wrote: > > > Is this going to make into GWT JRE Emulation proper any time soon? > > https://github.com/OneGeek/GWT-CompletableFuture >

Re: Happy to announce general access for J2CL!

2018-11-21 Thread Ahmad Bawaneh
Several people have started the work on their free time.. any help will be really appreciated. On Wednesday, November 21, 2018 at 1:11:09 PM UTC+2, Олег Рачаев wrote: > > I don't even want to look in the direction of J2CL until it starts using > the generally accepted build system - Gradle. >

Re: First application working as both J2CL and gwt2 at the same time

2018-11-27 Thread Ahmad Bawaneh
The GWT version already compiled with all properties collapsed On Tuesday, November 27, 2018 at 1:02:32 PM UTC+2, Kirill Prazdnikov wrote: > > I agree, if you compare GWT vs J2CL program, then it is fair to switch GWT > to single permutation single-script linker before to measure. > And even

Re: First application working as both J2CL and gwt2 at the same time

2018-11-27 Thread Ahmad Bawaneh
, 22. November 2018 21:42:04 UTC+1 schrieb Ahmad Bawaneh: >> >> Hi >> I am happy to announce that i was able to build and deploy one of my >> applications using both J2CL and gwt2 at the same time. >> you can browse both versions here >> >> J2CL : https://

Re: First application working as both J2CL and gwt2 at the same time

2018-11-27 Thread Ahmad Bawaneh
I was waiting for next weekend to start running some experiments, such notes are really helpful.. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to

Re: First application working as both J2CL and gwt2 at the same time

2018-11-27 Thread Ahmad Bawaneh
even though j2cl inside google works with bazel and not maven, since j2cl was still private there was a work done to make it work with maven, @Colin built a tool that can run j2cl in a development which uses an old version of the closure compiler to allow incremental compilation, and now as

First application working as both J2CL and gwt2 at the same time

2018-11-22 Thread Ahmad Bawaneh
Hi I am happy to announce that i was able to build and deploy one of my applications using both J2CL and gwt2 at the same time. you can browse both versions here J2CL : https://dominokit.github.io/dominodoj2cl/index.html GWT2 : https://dominokit.github.io/dominodo/index.html for those who

First I heard of "Domino UI"

2018-09-17 Thread Ahmad Bawaneh
There is a gitter channel if you wish you can ask there https://gitter.im/domino-gwt/domino-ui -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to

Re: Should I use GWT or anything else for my Web App

2018-09-17 Thread Ahmad Bawaneh
For me i use GWT because i am a Java developer with 10+ years of experience and i think that i need to build up something close to this experience in JS before i can say i can produce the same results and being as productive. Also one of the things that i like the most about GWT is ability to

Re: Should I use GWT or anything else for my Web App

2018-09-18 Thread Ahmad Bawaneh
You can start from the gitter channels, both libs has a very active channels Domino-ui gitter channel VueGwt channel also joining the GWT channel is recommended On Tuesday, September

Re: Immutables with RestyGWT and gwt-jackson

2019-04-02 Thread Ahmad Bawaneh
Do you have a simple sample project, i would like to see if what is needed to make this also works with gwt-jackosn-apt. On Tuesday, April 2, 2019 at 10:03:28 PM UTC+3, foal wrote: > > Hi, > > Spent several hours to make workable Immutables ( > https://immutables.github.io) objects with RestyGWT

Re: Immutables with RestyGWT and gwt-jackson

2019-04-03 Thread Ahmad Bawaneh
> > > On Tuesday, April 2, 2019 at 9:09:00 PM UTC+2, Ahmad Bawaneh wrote: >> >> Do you have a simple sample project, i would like to see if what is >> needed to make this also works with gwt-jackosn-apt. >> >> On Tuesday, April 2, 2019 at 10:03:28 PM UTC+3

Re: Is this project active?

2019-04-03 Thread Ahmad Bawaneh
More than ever before. Event this group indicate that it is a very active project, at least in terms of community, but also development is active around getting GWT 3.0 ready. On Thursday, March 28, 2019 at 8:58:47 AM UTC+2, carl.hos...@gmail.com wrote: > > Hello all! I am wondering how

Re: What do you need to know? For C++ programmer

2019-03-08 Thread Ahmad Bawaneh
I would say : more than what we think!. I know many and those in my list keeps expanding .. I think GWT now is just like java .. even though there is so many are using yet no one is bragging about it.. it is stable .. works .. reliable .. integrates .. So as answer to the question. Yes.. i do

A set of libs working in both j2cl and gwt2

2019-05-27 Thread Ahmad Bawaneh
Dears DominoKit is glad to announce a set of small libs that works for both gwt and j2cl : - - *domino-slf4j-logger *: use slf4j logging on gwt/j2cl client side, good for code portability over the JVM. https://github.com/DominoKit/domino-slf4j-logger - *domino-aggregator* :

Re: GWT - Still Active ?

2019-05-28 Thread Ahmad Bawaneh
we had this question the other day but it was in the other form `Is GWT dead` TLDR: Yes it is still active and we made huge progress as a community toward GTW 3.0, we now have a working j2cl maven plugin, and we have lots of GWT2 ported modules working already in j2cl/gwt3. the ecosystem is

Re: GWT - Still Active ?

2019-05-31 Thread Ahmad Bawaneh
This is one of the things that are preventing us from releasing 2.9 https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/google-web-toolkit-contributors/VN4ATVrLrTA any help here will be appreciated. On Thursday, May 30, 2019 at 11:32:22 PM UTC+3, Michael Joyner wrote: > > Ideally, twice yearly release of

Re: Is this project active?

2019-05-31 Thread Ahmad Bawaneh
@Bob We do really understand how you feel, we were there at some point. BUT On Thursday, May 30, 2019 at 10:31:38 PM UTC+3, Bob Lacatena wrote: > > GWT is suffering from a very serious publicity debacle. I'm actively > doing GWT development, and regretting every moment of it right now. Years

Re: GWT - Still Active ?

2019-05-31 Thread Ahmad Bawaneh
I also posted a reply here for anyone reading this thread instead of the other one https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-6KuZjHFD5c/yxouo-PHAwAJ On Thursday, May 30, 2019 at 10:33:30 PM UTC+3, Bob Lacatena wrote: > > I just posted this elsewhere, but as this thread has more

Re: GWT - Still Active ?

2019-05-31 Thread Ahmad Bawaneh
Even though it is still working for us SDM works perfectly in large projects long as your code isnt really too coupled, and regarding RPC you might take a look here https://www.slideshare.net/gwtcon/in-defense-of-gwtrpc-by-colin-alworth/ currently i am using domino-rest

Re: GWT - Still Active ?

2019-06-01 Thread Ahmad Bawaneh
On Sunday, June 2, 2019 at 1:22:09 AM UTC+3, Edson Richter wrote: > > This is my opinion (from a person with more than 30 years of experience in > software enginnering), and I respect every other persons opinion - I'll > just not put my eggs on this basket for another 8 years "just to see if it

Re: GWT - Still Active ?

2019-06-01 Thread Ahmad Bawaneh
On Saturday, June 1, 2019 at 10:51:55 PM UTC+3, Andrew Buck wrote: > > GWT is not dead! It's simply suffering from PR misunderstanding. People > think that you have to use the old widget system to use GWT, but you don't. > Just use Elemento instead of widgets and REST calls instead of RPC. >

Re: GWT - Still Active ?

2019-06-01 Thread Ahmad Bawaneh
On Sunday, June 2, 2019 at 1:19:40 AM UTC+3, Douglas de Oliveira Mendes wrote: > > Ain't dead for me! Using it every day quite a lot. I still think it's a > great option if you have tons of widgets, panels, tabs... I see GWT > basically as an easier to distribute Java Web Start-like

"socket.io.js" + JSInterop

2019-06-19 Thread Ahmad Bawaneh
I am also using https://github.com/sockjs successfully with a vertx backend. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to

"socket.io.js" + JSInterop

2019-06-19 Thread Ahmad Bawaneh
Should you consider this as an option, which is future solution and will work with gwt2 and gwt3 https://github.com/niloc132/webbit-gwt -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from

Re: Is GWT 3.0 /GWT 2.9 dead?

2020-02-20 Thread Ahmad Bawaneh
You dont need to maintain a separate branch or code base, you can use the latest snapshot which is as stable as a release, i am pretty sure when 2.9 is release you will only need to switch version and everything still works, if you can use the snapshot for some reason you can use the unofficial

Re: Is GWT 3.0 /GWT 2.9 dead?

2020-02-20 Thread Ahmad Bawaneh
And lets not forget that it is not so long since j2cl was made public. On Thursday, February 20, 2020 at 1:00:33 PM UTC+2, Ahmad Bawaneh wrote: > > You dont need to maintain a separate branch or code base, you can use the > latest snapshot which is as stable as a release, i am pretty

Re: GWT strengths and suitability for enterprise apps - presentation

2020-02-20 Thread Ahmad Bawaneh
Would be also a good idea to point out to the evolving new ecosystem where new libraries and frameworks are being introduced. On Tuesday, December 8, 2015 at 7:52:35 PM UTC+2, deba...@ainosoft.com wrote: > > Dear community members, > > Recently I came across a medium sized company specializing

Re: GWT 2.9.0 release

2020-05-14 Thread Ahmad Bawaneh
Kit/domino>or gwt gitter channel <https://gitter.im/gwtproject/gwt> On Friday, May 15, 2020 at 1:33:17 AM UTC+3, Ahmad Bawaneh wrote: > > You can use domino-cli <https://github.com/DominoKit/domino-cli> to > create a j2cl simple maven project, download and the proper package f

Re: GWT 2.9.0 release

2020-05-14 Thread Ahmad Bawaneh
You can use domino-cli to create a j2cl simple maven project, download and the proper package for your operating system from the releases page , then from the command line use the following command

[gwt-contrib] GWT as OSGI plug-ins

2015-11-08 Thread Ahmad Bawaneh
Hi, I am new here and i am not sure if this is the right place for this, but i have made a new design model using the MVP model to simulate OSGI plug-ins for client side GWT code, and i was able to deploy my work inside and OSGI container - i used KARAF. i was able to write my application as a

[gwt-contrib] Re: GWT as OSGI plug-ins

2015-12-22 Thread Ahmad Bawaneh
Thank you very much for directions. On Monday, November 9, 2015 at 1:49:18 AM UTC+2, Jens wrote: > > Usually people publish their library/framework on Github along with some > examples/demos and then post it on gwt-users [1] and on G+ [2]. > > -- J > > > [1]

[gwt-contrib] Re: GWT as OSGI plug-ins

2015-12-22 Thread Ahmad Bawaneh
, at the end all modules/project are combined and compiled as one unit at run-time. so i think a merge in the future between what i did and what u did could be awesome. On Monday, November 9, 2015 at 4:00:27 AM UTC+2, Cristian Rinaldi wrote: > > Hey Ahmad Bawaneh, > > Currently I'm working

[gwt-contrib] Re: GWT as OSGI plug-ins

2015-12-22 Thread Ahmad Bawaneh
once i add my work to github ill post it here. On Sunday, November 8, 2015 at 10:47:37 PM UTC+2, Ahmad Bawaneh wrote: > > Hi, > I am new here and i am not sure if this is the right place for this, but i > have made a new design model using the MVP model to simulate OSGI plug-ins

[gwt-contrib] Re: GWT as OSGI plug-ins

2015-12-22 Thread Ahmad Bawaneh
Thank you very much for directing me. On Monday, November 9, 2015 at 1:49:18 AM UTC+2, Jens wrote: > > Usually people publish their library/framework on Github along with some > examples/demos and then post it on gwt-users [1] and on G+ [2]. > > -- J > > > [1]

[gwt-contrib] JsInterop with separate GWT module compilation

2016-04-18 Thread Ahmad Bawaneh
Hi All, is there any sample for using JsInterop to make communication between GWT module compiled each on its own? i think this will be a good idea to start implementing client side plugins and modularity. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT

[gwt-contrib] Re: Last call for GWT 2.8.2 patches, and testers needed!

2017-10-06 Thread Ahmad Bawaneh
I would like to test too On Tuesday, October 3, 2017 at 1:28:48 PM UTC+3, Colin Alworth wrote: > > As you can see from https://github.com/gwtproject/gwt/milestone/18, GWT > 2.8.2 is almost ready to go! This release is important to get out for > several reasons: > > * Supports running the

[gwt-contrib] Re: Which API for a future, modern JSON library?

2017-12-27 Thread Ahmad Bawaneh
Hi I have been working on an adaptation of gwt-jackson that uses APT instead of generators https://github.com/vegegoku/gwt-jackson-apt now i have plans to support using the same API for both client side and server side and want to consider the JsXxxx types as supported types for

[gwt-contrib] Porting gwt-i18n module to gwt3

2018-01-05 Thread Ahmad Bawaneh
Dears I am working on porting the *i18n* module, so far all i did is extract the module and the tests into and external repository and make the tests pass, not real change to the code have been yet. but the *i18n* module is an important module and is being used by so many gwt application so

[gwt-contrib] Re: Porting gwt-i18n module to gwt3

2018-01-06 Thread Ahmad Bawaneh
wrong on that. Reusing that .properties format for localized files and > BundleName_locale.properties file name format seems like an express design > goal to me, no matter what other changes happen along the way. > > On Friday, January 5, 2018 at 11:33:48 AM UTC-6, Ahmad Bawaneh wrote: >> >> Dea

[gwt-contrib] Re: Which API for a future, modern JSON library?

2018-01-11 Thread Ahmad Bawaneh
I am glad to announce the latest jackson-apt that provide support for using the same mapper instance on both client side and server side, finally you can annotate the type in the shared module and generate a mapper into the shared module and use it in both client code and server code, sample

[gwt-contrib] Re: Porting gwt-i18n module to gwt3

2018-01-20 Thread Ahmad Bawaneh
, January 5, 2018 at 7:33:48 PM UTC+2, Ahmad Bawaneh wrote: > > Dears > I am working on porting the *i18n* module, so far all i did is extract > the module and the tests into and external repository and make the tests > pass, not real change to the code have been yet. but th

[gwt-contrib] Updating GWT CLDR data from v25 to v32

2018-02-02 Thread Ahmad Bawaneh
Dears I have been working on updating the CLDR data from cldr version 25 to cldr version 32, the generation of the new data have been done successfully and all gwt test cases pass. i would like to make a pull request for both the cldr tools and gwt but first i need to discuss the part related

[gwt-contrib] Re: Updating GWT CLDR data from v25 to v32

2018-02-02 Thread Ahmad Bawaneh
Sorry i forgot to link my work to this issue https://github.com/gwtproject/gwt/issues/9557 On Friday, February 2, 2018 at 9:47:59 PM UTC+2, Ahmad Bawaneh wrote: > > Dears > I have been working on updating the CLDR data from cldr version 25 to cldr > version 32, the generation of

[gwt-contrib] Re: Migrating and update gwt-user.jar modules to github.com/gwtproject

2018-06-21 Thread Ahmad Bawaneh
Hi the gwt-timer module now is gwt3/j2cl ready i would like to move the module into gwtproject repository but i dont have permissions. the module can be found here for your kind review and approval. https://github.com/vegegoku/gwt-timer Thanks On Friday, January 12, 2018 at 11:58:32 PM UTC+2,

[gwt-contrib] Re: Porting gwt-i18n module to gwt3

2018-01-13 Thread Ahmad Bawaneh
knowledge currently presented with generators. so if you have any point/note/suggestion to add i will appreciate that. Thanks On Friday, January 5, 2018 at 7:33:48 PM UTC+2, Ahmad Bawaneh wrote: > > Dears > I am working on porting the *i18n* module, so far all i did is extract >

[gwt-contrib] Re: Updating GWT CLDR data from v25 to v32

2018-03-01 Thread Ahmad Bawaneh
s pushed to tools? If not, are we comfortable >> just using the standard CLDR 32 release, so we can fix the out-of-date >> timezones that currently plague GWT? >> >> On Friday, February 2, 2018 at 1:51:18 PM UTC-6, Ahmad Bawaneh wrote: >>> >>> Sorry i forgot

[gwt-contrib] Re: Updating GWT CLDR data from v25 to v32

2018-03-10 Thread Ahmad Bawaneh
The update for the latest CLDR data is now on gerrit for review https://gwt-review.googlesource.com/c/gwt/+/20600 On Friday, February 2, 2018 at 9:47:59 PM UTC+2, Ahmad Bawaneh wrote: > > Dears > I have been working on updating the CLDR data from cldr version 25 to cldr >

[gwt-contrib] Re: Naming convention for ported GWT modules

2018-04-07 Thread Ahmad Bawaneh
kind review is really appreciated specially for the grade build scripts as i am new to gradle. Thanks On Saturday, April 7, 2018 at 12:34:11 PM UTC+3, Thomas Broyer wrote: > > > > On Friday, April 6, 2018 at 6:16:50 PM UTC+2, Ahmad Bawaneh wrote: >> >> Hi >> i am work

[gwt-contrib] Re: Porting gwt-i18n module to gwt3

2018-04-07 Thread Ahmad Bawaneh
a ported version of the gwt-cldr importer and gwt-cldr is now available on github https://github.com/vegegoku/gwt-i18n-cldr https://github.com/vegegoku/gwt-cldr-importer On Friday, January 5, 2018 at 7:33:48 PM UTC+2, Ahmad Bawaneh wrote: > > Dears > I am working on porting the *i18

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: Porting gwt-i18n module to gwt3

2018-04-07 Thread Ahmad Bawaneh
I also one of those who replaced gwt-i18n with my own implementation which was a simple dictionary like, that loads the labels and messages at runtime, but in my case i didnt need more than plain simple text translation without parameters or anything else. with that said, one of the goals of

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: Porting gwt-i18n module to gwt3

2018-04-08 Thread Ahmad Bawaneh
IMO more as > an "experimentation" exploring what can be done than a definitive answer to > how is *should* be done now. > > On Saturday, April 7, 2018 at 8:39:32 PM UTC+2, Ahmad Bawaneh wrote: >> >> I also one of those who replaced gwt-i18n with my own implementation >&g

[gwt-contrib] Re: Naming convention for ported GWT modules

2018-04-06 Thread Ahmad Bawaneh
Hi i am working on date pickers for domino-ui, mean while i found that in order to support different locales in the date picker i need the DateTimeFormat information for each locale, gwt in the other hand has a decent support for datetime format informtion, so instead of adding my own

[gwt-contrib] Re: Naming convention for ported GWT modules

2018-03-24 Thread Ahmad Bawaneh
OK then, this means that gwt-timer should use *org.gtwproject* as group id and *gwt-timer* as artifact id. On Saturday, March 24, 2018 at 11:30:10 AM UTC+2, Mincong Huang wrote: > > Hi, > > I'd like to have a clarification about the naming convention for ported > GWT modules. Because I'm

[gwt-contrib] Re: How can I contribute to GWT?

2018-03-22 Thread Ahmad Bawaneh
, 2018 at 10:39:00 AM UTC+1, Ahmad Bawaneh wrote: >> >> Nice to see people asking about this, i went through this before you and >> now i do my small part of contributions because i love GWT i want it to be >> better and i want to help the amazing developer who maint

[gwt-contrib] Re: How can I contribute to GWT?

2018-03-21 Thread Ahmad Bawaneh
Nice to see people asking about this, i went through this before you and now i do my small part of contributions because i love GWT i want it to be better and i want to help the amazing developer who maintain and provide us with such stable wonderful library. I was a GWT nop even though i used

[gwt-contrib] Re: Updating GWT CLDR data from v25 to v32

2018-03-02 Thread Ahmad Bawaneh
rtant, can you weigh in on how we will >> evaluate the jar before it gets pushed to tools? If not, are we comfortable >> just using the standard CLDR 32 release, so we can fix the out-of-date >> timezones that currently plague GWT? >> >> On Friday, February 2, 2018 a

[gwt-contrib] Re: Updating GWT CLDR data from v25 to v32

2018-10-24 Thread Ahmad Bawaneh
, so I have prepared a follow-up patch which will update gwt ICU4J version to 63.1 from the current 50.1.1 the git hub issue for this change is here https://github.com/gwtproject/gwt/issues/8703 On Friday, February 2, 2018 at 9:47:59 PM UTC+2, Ahmad Bawaneh wrote: > > Dears > I ha

[gwt-contrib] Re: Updating GWT CLDR data from v25 to v32

2018-11-13 Thread Ahmad Bawaneh
Hi With the PR for the tools being already merged https://github.com/gwtproject/tools/pull/16 I am looking for review and approval on the gwt PR https://gwt-review.googlesource.com/c/gwt/+/21421 Thanks. On Friday, February 2, 2018 at 9:47:59 PM UTC+2, Ahmad Bawaneh wrote: > > Dears &g

[gwt-contrib] GWT 3.0 ready editors porting completed

2018-11-16 Thread Ahmad Bawaneh
Hi i would like to announce that i have completed the gwt-editors porting to annotation processor, and now is GWT 3.0 ready. the work was started by both Colin Alworth and Frank Hossfeld thanks for them both for the great work

Re: [gwt-contrib] GWT 3.0 ready editors porting completed

2018-11-16 Thread Ahmad Bawaneh
I already made it work with domino-ui <https://github.com/DominoKit/domino-ui>, in domino-ui j2cl-public branch On Friday, November 16, 2018 at 5:46:39 PM UTC+2, Michael Joyner wrote: > > Can this be used with any UI kit? > > On 11/16/18 10:32 AM, Ahmad Bawaneh wrote: >

[gwt-contrib] Template for porting GWT modules

2018-12-07 Thread Ahmad Bawaneh
Hi For maven we have a template for ported GWT modules to GWT 3.0 here https://github.com/Vertispan/some-gwt-module It would be realy helpful for gradle experts to provide a template for gradle in order to be consistence. Thanks -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the

[gwt-contrib] What tool generates TimeZoneConstants.properties?

2018-12-07 Thread Ahmad Bawaneh
Anyone know what is generating TimeZoneConstants.properties, it says it is generated from CLDR version 25 .. but i cant find any thing that generates this gile in gwt code nor in gwt-tools code, was it generated externally? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: What tool generates TimeZoneConstants.properties?

2018-12-08 Thread Ahmad Bawaneh
ic commentary. >> >> -- >> Colin Alworth >> co...@colinalworth.com >> >> >> >> On Fri, Dec 7, 2018, at 8:32 AM, Thomas Broyer wrote: >> >> >> >> On Friday, December 7, 2018 at 1:54:09 PM UTC+1, Ahmad Bawaneh wrote: &

[gwt-contrib] Re: Template for porting GWT modules

2018-12-08 Thread Ahmad Bawaneh
yer wrote: > > Setting a reminder for tomorrow. I'll see what I can do this weekend. > > On Friday, December 7, 2018 at 12:39:52 PM UTC+1, Ahmad Bawaneh wrote: >> >> Hi >> >> For maven we have a template for ported GWT modules to GWT 3.0 here >> https://git

Re: [gwt-contrib] GWT 3.0 ready editors porting completed

2018-11-21 Thread Ahmad Bawaneh
This will be very appreciated On Tuesday, November 20, 2018 at 9:45:12 PM UTC+2, ManfredTremmel wrote: > > Thanks a lot. I've planed to start porting gwt-bean-validators on X-Mass > hollyday, this will help a lot. > > Am Freitag, 16. November 2018, 07:32:21 CET schrieb Ahmad B

Re: [gwt-contrib] GWT 3.0 ready editors porting completed

2018-11-21 Thread Ahmad Bawaneh
s J2CL ready > or a version requires J2CL tool to the compilation? > > S. > > On Friday, November 16, 2018 at 5:06:46 PM UTC+1, Ahmad Bawaneh wrote: >> >> I already made it work with domino-ui >> <https://github.com/DominoKit/domino-ui>, in domino-ui j2cl-publi

[gwt-contrib] GWT number constants generator ?!!

2020-01-03 Thread Ahmad Bawaneh
Dears I am trying to figure out a way to generate and update GWT number constants, looking around i could not find the tool that generates those number constants properties files, they are being generated using an external tool that is not present in the GWT repo. Now since i could not find

[gwt-contrib] Re: Time to require JDK 8?

2019-12-29 Thread Ahmad Bawaneh
I also agree to the upgrade and reduce the burden from supporting older java versions, Java is moving faster now and brings new features that are also good to have in GWT world, so focus in supporting those feature rather than supporting very old java versions. On Thursday, April 25, 2019 at

Re: [gwt-contrib] GWT number constants generator ?!!

2020-01-06 Thread Ahmad Bawaneh
e = False > for ch in simple_pattern: > if ch == '\'': > in_quote = not in_quote > elif ch == ';' and not in_quote: > global_pattern += ur' \u00a4\u00a4' > global_pattern += ch > global_pattern += ur' \u00a4\u00a4' > return global_pattern