I've uploaded another patch set, which merges in the latest changes from the
trunk.
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 2:34 AM, John Tamplin j...@google.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 12:03 AM, John LaBanca jlaba...@google.comwrote:
@jat -
When do you think we'll merge the htmlunit branch into
@John L: You taking this one?
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 12:08 PM, Pascal Muetschard
pmuetsch...@google.comwrote:
I've uploaded another patch set, which merges in the latest changes from
the trunk.
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 2:34 AM, John Tamplin j...@google.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at
Yes, as soon as we get the build stabilized, I'll commit this.
Thanks,
John LaBanca
jlaba...@google.com
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 3:20 PM, Bruce Johnson br...@google.com wrote:
@John L: You taking this one?
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 12:08 PM, Pascal Muetschard
pmuetsch...@google.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 12:03 AM, John LaBanca jlaba...@google.com wrote:
@jat -
When do you think we'll merge the htmlunit branch into trunk so we can
check in this patch?
We are supposed to ship MS2 on Wednesday, so it has to be real soon.
--
John A. Tamplin
Software Engineer (GWT),
@jat -
When do you think we'll merge the htmlunit branch into trunk so we can check
in this patch?
Thanks,
John LaBanca
jlaba...@google.com
On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 2:58 PM, Pascal Muetschard pmuetsch...@google.comwrote:
I have updated the patch set to also have the benchmark test cases use the
I have updated the patch set to also have the benchmark test cases use the
new strategy. Please review it.
When do you think this will make it into the trunk?
Thanks.
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 4:36 PM, Pascal Muetschard
pmuetsch...@google.comwrote:
FYI, I've uploaded another patch to
Looks convenient, but I have a few questions/comments.
1) What happens if the module returned by getModuleName() already specifies
a fix value for a given property? More generally, how should one think about
how these annotations dovetail with the settings in the module config?
2) The
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 1:19 PM, Pascal Muetschard
pmuetsch...@google.comwrote:
1) What happens if the module returned by getModuleName() already specifies
a fix value for a given property? More generally, how should one think about
how these annotations dovetail with the settings in the
I'll help Pascal with the changes, but it might be good to get a few more
comments before changing too much. It *might *not be trivial for Benchmark
to subclass the new Strategy because it does its own thing as well, but it
shouldn't be too difficult.
I agree that the annotation should override
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 1:51 PM, John LaBanca jlaba...@google.com wrote:
I vote for @WithBindingProperties for the annotation name.
Is that a vote that we should start using the term binding properties in
general?
I think that's not quite the right term (perhaps this should be a separate
@WithClientProperties is fine with me. I thought we used the term binding
somewhere, but creating a DeferredBinding doesn't actual require the use of
the term binding. The gwt.xml files just refer to these as properties.
Thanks,
John LaBanca
jlaba...@google.com
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 1:57
11 matches
Mail list logo
