Hi Jeff, *,
Jeff Breidenbach schrieb:
((?:cid:)?|(?:(?:http://(?:www\.)?)?mail-archive\.com/)?)($AddrExp)
Tested and live. Thanks guys.
The initial posting's broken link remains broken:
http://www.mail-archive.com/discuss%40documentfoundation.org/msg00453.html
Does this mean that's true for
Hi *,
On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 1:03 PM, Friedrich Strohmaier
damokles4-lis...@bits-fritz.de wrote:
Hi Jeff, *,
Jeff Breidenbach schrieb:
((?:cid:)?|(?:(?:http://(?:www\.)?)?mail-archive\.com/)?)($AddrExp)
Tested and live. Thanks guys.
Thanks a lot!
The initial posting's broken link
Hi Christian, *,
Christian Lohmaier schrieb:
On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 1:03 PM, Friedrich Strohmaier
damokles4-lis...@bits-fritz.de wrote:
[..]
The initial posting's broken link remains broken:
http://www.mail-archive.com/discuss%40documentfoundation.org/msg00453.html
I personally did not
The interesting question: is it possible? Are the originating
mails stored so that the visible html can be repaired?
A mathematician, a physicist, and an engineer walk into a bar.
The mathematician says The raw mail exists even the old stuff is in
offline
cold storage. It can be matched by
Hi Jeff, *,
Jeff Breidenbach schrieb:
There are two cases that are very common and handled poorly. One
is an http hyperlink to mail-archive.com as we've been discussing.
The other is a a mailto hyperlink. These are correctly obfuscated,
but end up as a broken link. Better to not have a link
You could also add the prefix to the method, as alternative to the
already existing cid case.
((?:cid:)?|(?:(?:http://(?:www\.)?)?mail-archive\.com/)?)($AddrExp)
Thank you, Christian. Sending this guinea pig to make sure it works as expected.
Test data below:
j...@jab.org
http://j...@jab.org
Hi Jeff, *,
Jeff Breidenbach schrieb:
[..]
Your feature request is valid and if you are feeling eager, feel free
to send in a patch. Otherwise we'll get to it when inspiration
strikes (and I have to warn you, inspiration can be rather slow to
strike sometimes...).
I know of :o)).
Hi Friedrich, *,
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 12:11 PM, Friedrich Strohmaier
damokles4-lis...@bits-fritz.de wrote:
Jeff Breidenbach schrieb:
[..]
http://www.mhonarc.org/MHonArc/doc/resources/addressmodifycode.html
AddressModifyCode
$orig_address = $_;
$address = lc($orig_address);
if
Hi Christian, *,
long time no see .. ;o))
Christian Lohmaier schrieb:
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 12:11 PM, Friedrich Strohmaier
damokles4-lis...@bits-fritz.de wrote:
Jeff Breidenbach schrieb:
[..]
http://www.mhonarc.org/MHonArc/doc/resources/addressmodifycode.html
AddressModifyCode
[..]
Hi Friedrich, *;
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 3:22 PM, Friedrich Strohmaier
damokles4-lis...@bits-fritz.de wrote:
long time no see .. ;o))
:-)
Christian Lohmaier schrieb:
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 12:11 PM, Friedrich Strohmaier
[...]
in this case - I fear AddressModifyCode isn't the right thing
Hi Christian, *,
Christian Lohmaier schrieb:
[...]
I had a quick look at MHonArc sources and there are two possible
points where the behavriour can be tweaked.
One is the expression that identifies email-addresses in lib/mhinit.pl
[.. cleaning classes, running to a mirror to look whether
Hi Earl, *,
Earl Hood schrieb:
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 1:42 PM, Friedrich Strohmaier wrote:
You could also add the prefix to the method, as alternative to the
already existing cid case.
((?:cid:)?|(?:(?:http://(?:www\.)?)?mail-archive\.com/)?)($AddrExp)
This one should work in any case
Hi Earl, *,
Did You read the mails?
Earl Hood schrieb:
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 3:45 PM, Friedrich Strohmaier wrote:
Once can avoid the munging on the authoring side be URL escaping
the @ character with %40
shure harvesters don't know the trick? :o))
IIRC, the source of this discussion
(12/10/2010 02:31 PM), Friedrich Strohmaier wrote:
IIRC, the source of this discussion was that a URL that
uses an @ was getting munged. If this is not desired,
the author can use %40 in the URL and this will bypass
the filtering done by M-A.
Shure, we will succeed to convince all authors
Well then - if you want to obfuscate anything that looks like an
email address EXCEPT an email address representing one of the 5000+
lists being archived here, then really the only way to do that is
to have a hash of all the list addresses and check for those in the
AddressModifyCode section.
if
The Mail Archive does have to be very aggressive to obfuscate email
addresses, otherwise a lot of people go bonkers. But yes, it is dumb to
break a hyperlink, especially a hyperlink to The Mail Archive. Your feature
request is valid and if you are feeling eager, feel free to send in a patch.
16 matches
Mail list logo
