Re: portlet content mode prototype

2006-09-21 Thread Philip Mark Donaghy
I tried the wysiwyg portlet out, this is one of the best portlets I have ever seen. I'm looking forward to collaborating with you. I checked back for the source but it's gone, sniff .`( Philip On 9/18/06, Edgar Poce [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I uploaded a new version of the jcr portlets

Re: portlet content mode prototype

2006-09-21 Thread Torgeir Veimo
On 21 Sep 2006, at 08:45, Philip Mark Donaghy wrote: I tried the wysiwyg portlet out, this is one of the best portlets I have ever seen. I'm looking forward to collaborating with you. I checked back for the source but it's gone, sniff .`( Did either of you have it running online somewhere

Re: portlet content mode prototype

2006-09-21 Thread Philip Mark Donaghy
That would be cool if someone had an online demo. On 9/21/06, Torgeir Veimo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 21 Sep 2006, at 08:45, Philip Mark Donaghy wrote: I tried the wysiwyg portlet out, this is one of the best portlets I have ever seen. I'm looking forward to collaborating with you. I

Re: portlet content mode prototype

2006-09-21 Thread Christophe Lombart
Hi edgar, I just deployed the portlet war and it works. I'm not sure it is the most recent one. I have not all features (check-in check-out, ...). Do I have to build from the source to get thoses features ? br Christophe On 9/21/06, Philip Mark Donaghy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: That would be

Re: portlet content mode prototype

2006-09-21 Thread Edgar Poce
Hi christope, On 9/21/06, Christophe Lombart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi edgar, I just deployed the portlet war and it works. I'm not sure it is the most recent one. I have not all features (check-in check-out, ...). versioning is available in the three versions I uploaded, in the first

Re: portlet content mode prototype

2006-09-21 Thread Christophe Lombart
Compare to the existing Graffito codebase, this is completely another approach to build content portlets (100% dependent on the JCR API ). Christophe

Re: portlet content mode prototype

2006-09-21 Thread Edgar Poce
Hi, On 9/21/06, Philip Mark Donaghy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I tried the wysiwyg portlet out, this is one of the best portlets I have ever seen. nice to hear you like it :) I'm looking forward to collaborating with you. It would be great to collaborate to move it forward. I checked

Re: portlet content mode prototype

2006-09-21 Thread Edgar Poce
On 9/21/06, Christophe Lombart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: no. Do you see a tab in help mode with the label versioning?. I see only a info tab page then, for some reason it's not working correctly :(, there are at least 8 tabs. I'll try to upload a demo and let you know.

Re: portlet content mode prototype

2006-09-21 Thread Christophe Lombart
I just deployed the war maybe I forgot to do something. On 9/21/06, Edgar Poce [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 9/21/06, Christophe Lombart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: no. Do you see a tab in help mode with the label versioning?. I see only a info tab page then, for some reason it's not working

Re: portlet content mode prototype

2006-09-21 Thread Evangelos Vlachogiannis
some result here. I have just deployed that. No other tab. I only changed the repo path in web.xml. Do I need to config something? O/H Christophe Lombart ??: I just deployed the war maybe I forgot to do something. On 9/21/06, Edgar Poce [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 9/21/06, Christophe

Re: portlet content mode prototype

2006-09-21 Thread Edgar Poce
I see, it doesn't work, the info tab shows: Portlet is Not Available: graffito-jcr-portlets-1.0::WYSIWYG portlet Reason: null is there any error in the tomcat log? On 9/21/06, Evangelos Vlachogiannis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: and a public live demo

Re: portlet content mode prototype

2006-09-21 Thread Christophe Lombart
Here is the error in the log. An error occurred at line: 10 in the jsp file: /WEB-INF/jsp/cms/info.jsp Generated servlet error: The operator + is undefined for the argument type(s) java.lang.Object, java.lang.Object On 9/21/06, Edgar Poce [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I see, it doesn't work, the

Re: portlet content mode prototype

2006-09-21 Thread Edgar Poce
On 9/21/06, Christophe Lombart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Compare to the existing Graffito codebase, this is completely another approach to build content portlets (100% dependent on the JCR API ). As we discussed earlier, the only integration with the existing approach would be at the

Re: portlet content mode prototype

2006-09-21 Thread Edgar Poce
sincere apologies for the loss of time, It seems I modified the jsp inside eclipse and didn't make a new build before uploading the war :(. I'll upload a new version in a couple of minutes. It's a missing cast in WEB-INF/jsp/cms/info.jsp: %= response.encodeUrl(

Re: portlet content mode prototype

2006-09-21 Thread Edgar Poce
It's uploaded now. sorry for the inconvenience. On 9/21/06, Christophe Lombart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Here is the error in the log. An error occurred at line: 10 in the jsp file: /WEB-INF/jsp/cms/info.jsp Generated servlet error: The operator + is undefined for the argument type(s)

Re: portlet content mode prototype

2006-09-21 Thread Christophe Lombart
Edgar, Did you already uploaded the new war ? still the same problem here. br, Christophe On 9/21/06, Edgar Poce [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It's uploaded now. sorry for the inconvenience. On 9/21/06, Christophe Lombart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Here is the error in the log. An error occurred

Re: portlet content mode prototype

2006-09-21 Thread Christophe Lombart
On 9/21/06, Edgar Poce [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'd like to make clear that I'm not in a crusade in favor of jcr. I'm interested in seeing the features I'm talking independently of implementation details. Sorry if I'm being repetitive, but my interest is seeing 1. CMS features for j2 portal

Re: portlet content mode prototype

2006-09-21 Thread Philip Mark Donaghy
On 9/21/06, Edgar Poce [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 9/21/06, Christophe Lombart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Compare to the existing Graffito codebase, this is completely another approach to build content portlets (100% dependent on the JCR API ). snip 2. integration of portlet contents to the

Re: j2 page manager status

2006-09-21 Thread Christophe Lombart
Hi Edgar, What do you mean with only? I'm not sure if I understand you correctly. I understand that graffito should provide an implementation of the page manager interface in order to provide a set of cms services to manage the pages, folders, links, fragments, etc. ok sorry for the

Re: portlet content mode prototype

2006-09-21 Thread Edgar Poce
On 9/21/06, Edgar Poce [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I mean integrating the the content of the portlets inside a psml page should be childs of that page (see the prototype). LOL, this is the result of reorganizing quickly a paragraph with copy and paste for a man with poor english skills :)

[jira] Created: (GRFT-104) Support versionning without node type definition

2006-09-21 Thread Christophe Lombart (JIRA)
Support versionning without node type definition Key: GRFT-104 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GRFT-104 Project: Graffito Issue Type: Improvement Components: JCR-Mapping

Re: documentation on Versioning

2006-09-21 Thread Christophe Lombart
Hi Ruchi, I added this issue in Jira. For this kind of issue, you can add it yourself. By this way, we are sure that you request will be reviewed. br, Christophe On 9/15/06, ruchi goel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is documentation on versioning available in svn ? It is not yet posted on the site

graffito goals and scope

2006-09-21 Thread Edgar Poce
On 9/21/06, Christophe Lombart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This project is not always clear for some people. Please don't take wrong my personal opinions on this subject, I hope you to take it as constructive feedback. I think that the project goals sometimes are not clear because the framework

[jira] Commented: (GRFT-99) ManageableCollectionUtil should not throw unsupported JcrMapping exception

2006-09-21 Thread Christophe Lombart (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GRFT-99?page=comments#action_12436643 ] Christophe Lombart commented on GRFT-99: Dan, I'm sorry but I forget some details on this issue. If I understand, you want a generic implementation for the

[jira] Commented: (GRFT-101) Allow developer to supply newInstace method in subclass of ObjectConverterImpl

2006-09-21 Thread Christophe Lombart (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GRFT-101?page=comments#action_12436645 ] Christophe Lombart commented on GRFT-101: - Dan, Can you provide a patch for this issue ? Allow developer to supply newInstace method in subclass of

[jira] Commented: (GRFT-99) ManageableCollectionUtil should not throw unsupported JcrMapping exception

2006-09-21 Thread Dan Connelly (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GRFT-99?page=comments#action_12436657 ] Dan Connelly commented on GRFT-99: -- Two things are needed to implement this fix: 1) A new class ManageableCollectionImpl (or ManageableCollectionWrapper if

[jira] Commented: (GRFT-99) ManageableCollectionUtil should not throw unsupported JcrMapping exception

2006-09-21 Thread Dan Connelly (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GRFT-99?page=comments#action_12436662 ] Dan Connelly commented on GRFT-99: -- Of course, the user will need to implement a custom CollectionConvert when his object model as a Collection that is not a

[jira] Commented: (GRFT-101) Allow developer to supply newInstace method in subclass of ObjectConverterImpl

2006-09-21 Thread Dan Connelly (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GRFT-101?page=comments#action_12436669 ] Dan Connelly commented on GRFT-101: --- The setCollection method in a previous comment is not necessary. Its the same as the setNestedProperty method. Allow