On 3/16/07, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
The directory 'trunk/debian' in svn is nearly 10 years old and I
wonder who still uses it. Shouldn't it get removed?
anyone out there?
___
gtk-devel-list mailing list
Nicolas, can you get another profile using Markku's patch?
Most certainly!
A couple of preliminary remarks.
I have observed a startup time increase of between 20% and 30%.
When scrolling, here is what I observed:
- when displaying the selected row, performance is as bad as
before
On Mon, 26 Mar 2007 19:19:22 -0600, Hans Petter Jansson wrote:
Also, the last time I checked, valgrind would only let you suppress
messages about invalid accesses, not leaked memory.
No, it definitely allows suppressions for leaked memory, via a
Memcheck:Leak suppression entry. I've included an
On Tue, 2007-03-27 at 07:37 +0100, Alex Jones wrote:
A few years ago there used to be a distributor patch in Gentoo to enable
this, and it was sweet. What happened, here?
I dunno, but it's more than sweet. Whoever remember the text editor
CygnusED, which had a very smooth scrolling,
On Tue, Mar 27, 2007, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
The directory 'trunk/debian' in svn is nearly 10 years old and I
wonder who still uses it. Shouldn't it get removed?
anyone out there?
It's a piece of history! 17 Nov 1998! Standards-Version: 2.4.0.0!
This is the unstable 1.1 branch of
So bugzilla is again available to me. Any tips on where to file this bug?
Jake Goulding wrote:
As soon as we get a bug for this (I don't seem
to be able to access bugzilla.gnome.org right now...) I'll post the
patch and let you take a look at it.
--
JAKE GOULDING
Software Engineer
[EMAIL
2007/3/27, Nicolas Setton [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Nicolas, can you get another profile using Markku's patch?
Most certainly!
A couple of preliminary remarks.
I have observed a startup time increase of between 20% and 30%.
When scrolling, here is what I observed:
- when displaying the
On Tue, 2007-03-27 at 15:54 +0200, Xavier Bestel wrote:
On Tue, 2007-03-27 at 07:37 +0100, Alex Jones wrote:
A few years ago there used to be a distributor patch in Gentoo to enable
this, and it was sweet. What happened, here?
I dunno, but it's more than sweet. Whoever remember the text
I don't really understand the old (nor the IE5 implementation), but I'd
imagine the best way to do it would involve keeping the current scroll
values and just having something constantly adjust the position of the
scrolled canvas to follow certain rules.
I'd say, 250ms is probably reasonable - so
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103811
On Tue, 2007-03-27 at 07:37 +0100, Alex Jones wrote:
A few years ago there used to be a distributor patch in Gentoo to enable
this, and it was sweet. What happened, here?
___
gtk-devel-list mailing
On Tue, 27 Mar 2007 17:50:08 +0200, Nicolas Setton wrote:
Interesting, the dashed stroke is exactly what's causing problems -
thanks for the pointer!
Ah, ...
though I *think* it has been adressed since. But if you are running
1.4, that would hint that it still is a problem.
There have
On Tue, 2007-03-27 at 06:46 -0700, Carl Worth wrote:
On Mon, 26 Mar 2007 19:19:22 -0600, Hans Petter Jansson wrote:
Also, the last time I checked, valgrind would only let you suppress
messages about invalid accesses, not leaked memory.
No, it definitely allows suppressions for leaked
Le mardi 27 mars 2007 à 18:43 +0100, Alex Jones a écrit :
I don't really understand the old (nor the IE5 implementation), but
I'd
imagine the best way to do it would involve keeping the current scroll
values and just having something constantly adjust the position of the
scrolled canvas to
Alexander Larsson wrote:
Do many apps really require creating launchers
from arbitrary desktop files? What is the typical usecase of that?
Well, the panel in multiple places (main menu, panel launchers, run
dialog). The various panel add-ons/replacements (the Novell main menu
and app launcher,
On Tue, 2007-03-27 at 15:54 +0200, Xavier Bestel wrote:
On Tue, 2007-03-27 at 07:37 +0100, Alex Jones wrote:
A few years ago there used to be a distributor patch in Gentoo to enable
this, and it was sweet. What happened, here?
I dunno, but it's more than sweet. Whoever remember the text
Hello,
On Tue, 2007-03-27 at 07:37 +0100, Alex Jones wrote:
A few years ago there used to be a distributor patch in Gentoo to enable
this, and it was sweet. What happened, here?
As far I know, the patch isn't yet clean enough for upstream integration
and work back then (gtk2.6 times) on it
After playing with Gedit a bit I think GTK+ isn't up to the task of
scrolling fast enough to achieve that.
Well, it's always going to depend on machine power. We don't have to
worry about it until we consider making it default.
Optimisation can come later, at least while it's non-default.
As
On Tue, Mar 27, 2007 at 06:46:19AM -0700, Carl Worth wrote:
On Mon, 26 Mar 2007 19:19:22 -0600, Hans Petter Jansson wrote:
Also, the last time I checked, valgrind would only let you suppress
messages about invalid accesses, not leaked memory.
No, it definitely allows suppressions for
On Tue, 2007-03-27 at 21:38 +0200, Xavier Bestel wrote:
After playing with Gedit a bit I think GTK+ isn't up to the task of
scrolling fast enough to achieve that.
I disagree. All you have to do is drag the scroll bar to see exactly
how fast and smooth, pixel-per-pixel scrolling can be.
On Tue, 2007-03-27 at 11:27 -0400, मयंक जैन (makuchaku) wrote:
On 3/16/07, Federico Mena Quintero [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Your mission, should you decide to accept it, is to do this:
- Get the latest GTK+ from svn trunk.
- Go through each of the unreviewed patches and classify them
20 matches
Mail list logo
