GLIB/Gdbus support for kdbus
Hi All, I am completely new to this mailing list. I saw some work was done by the Tizen people testing an initial implementation of GDBUS with KDBUS support. This was end of last year that I saw some patches appearing on the Tizen mailing list. Can anyone give me an idea of whether any further work or testing was done or is planned on this from the GLIB side? We are planning to use the GDBUS binding for DBUS in our firmware, but I am hoping that the faster KDBUS implementation would be available by the end of 2015 so we can release a product using the faster implementation, and allow us to use the same interface for more data intensive application when future functionality needs to be added. Any comments would be appreciated. Kind Regards, Frederik Lotter Firmware Engineer, Mix Telematics South Africa ___ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
Re: GLIB/Gdbus support for kdbus
On 10/03/2014 09:48 AM, Frederik Lotter wrote: Hi All, Hi, I am completely new to this mailing list. I saw some work was done by the Tizen people testing an initial implementation of GDBUS with KDBUS support. This was end of last year that I saw some patches appearing on the Tizen mailing list. Can anyone give me an idea of whether any further work or testing was done or is planned on this from the GLIB side? We are planning to use the GDBUS binding for DBUS in our firmware, but I am hoping that the faster KDBUS implementation would be available by the end of 2015 so we can release a product using the faster implementation, and allow us to use the same interface for more data intensive application when future functionality needs to be added. Any comments would be appreciated. Here you can find all information on the current 'kdbus support in GLib' status: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=721861 and https://github.com/lukasz-skalski/glib.git (branch: wip/kdbus-support) https://github.com/lukasz-skalski/glib.git (branch: wip/kdbus-support-devel) Kind Regards, Frederik Lotter Firmware Engineer, Mix Telematics South Africa BR, -- Lukasz Skalski Samsung RD Institute Poland Samsung Electronics l.skal...@samsung.com ___ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list ___ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
Re: Improve word boundaries for text widgets
On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 7:39 AM, Sébastien Wilmet swil...@gnome.org wrote: On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 12:47:31AM -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote: I agree that we probably need a vfunc - there's different use cases that need different variants: natural language, code, xml, etc. For best results, we may even want a way to use different word breaking rules in different regions of the buffer. As an example, you might have comments embedded in code. So having better defaults in GTK+ would be a first step, I think it's more important. The vfunc can be added later. I think I want the default in GtkTextView/Pango to stay basically Unicode. So the vfunc may be needed sooner if you want to have vim-like behaviour in GtkSourceView. ___ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
