On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 7:39 AM, Sébastien Wilmet <swil...@gnome.org> wrote: > On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 12:47:31AM -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote: >> I agree that we probably need a vfunc - there's different use cases >> that need different variants: natural language, code, xml, etc. For >> best results, we may even want a way to use different word breaking >> rules in different regions of the buffer. As an example, you might >> have comments embedded in code. > > So having better defaults in GTK+ would be a first step, I think it's > more important. The vfunc can be added later.
I think I want the default in GtkTextView/Pango to stay basically Unicode. So the vfunc may be needed sooner if you want to have vim-like behaviour in GtkSourceView. _______________________________________________ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
