On Saturday 19 January 2008, Heather Rose Jones wrote:
On Jan 19, 2008, at 9:05 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I love the huge wide belts with enormous buckles. I've never
noticed them
before...such wide ones [that orange quilted one in the 1st pic is
fantastic!]
and worn in this style
In a message dated 1/18/2008 7:56:13 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Barthel_Bruyn_3.png
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Bartholom%C3%A4us_Bruyn_d._%C3%84._003
.jpg
I love the huge wide belts with
Ah Ha!
http://www.museothyssen.org/thyssen_ing/coleccion/obras_ficha_zoom605.html
I suppose one could argue this isn't a shirt, but I've never seen an under
dress with this kind of cuff...
Sg
FYI - If you ever need a hi res picture of this collection, they are very
helpful...a few years
At 6:55 AM -0700 1/18/08, Saragrace Knauf wrote:
Ah Ha!
http://www.museothyssen.org/thyssen_ing/coleccion/obras_ficha_zoom605.html
I suppose one could argue this isn't a shirt, but I've never seen an
under dress with this kind of cuff...
The portrait shows the garment as being lined, however
20th century, for european use.
- Original Message -
From: Saragrace Knauf [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Historical Costume [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 18, 2008 3:47 PM
Subject: RE: [h-cost] Found it! - Colored shirts in the 16th century?
Fair enough, but I don't think
In a message dated 1/18/2008 3:56:17 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Anyone know when shirt became applicable to over the underwear rather
than the first layer?
Well, it depends on whether it's cold or not, I would think.
And, y'know,
It could be a 'waistcoat' , sometimes called a 'shirt' in inventories,
meaning a layer for warmth. Usually you find them as flannen,
flannel, rarely lined silk, or sometimes linsey-woolsey, other
materials are possible, I'm just not at my resources. 2cents reading
out of context. Mari
On Jan
You do get colored shirts in the 19th century, but they are still underwear.
Meant to be worn under other clothing.
Ron Carnegie
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 18, 2008 5:30 PM
Subject: Re: [h-cost] Found it! - Colored shirts
Ah Ha!
http://www.museothyssen.org/thyssen_ing/coleccion/obras_ficha_zoom605.html
I suppose one could argue this isn't a shirt, but I've never seen an under
dress with this kind of cuff...
This type of sleeve appears quite often in dress of Cologne. They are
separate sleeves (and here are
In a message dated 1/18/2008 1:51:01 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This appears to be false sleeves and not sleeves of a hemd.
***
Indeed. I mean it's lined in red. Does that sound like a shirt or chimese?
**Start the year off right.
In a message dated 1/18/2008 1:58:23 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
3. In a book I have about the Throckmortons (but I'm
at the office, not at home, of course), a gentleman's
letter to his factor requests a certain amount of
tawney fabric for a shirt. Whether we are
I have in my search for documentation on this subject
found 3, count'em, 3, but they're sketchy as evidence
goes.
1. King Edward VI's coronation shirtwas crimson or
scarlet (I forget which, but it was red). Presumably
this is not a good dample for the rest of us, since a)
he was a king and b) it
Sharon wrote:
At 6:55 AM -0700 1/18/08, Saragrace Knauf wrote:
Ah Ha!
http://www.museothyssen.org/thyssen_ing/coleccion/obras_ficha_zoom605.html
I suppose one could argue this isn't a shirt, but I've never seen an
under dress with this kind of cuff...
The portrait shows the garment as being
13 matches
Mail list logo
