On Wed, 24 Dec 2003, Orna Agmon wrote:
On Wed, 24 Dec 2003, Ron Artstein wrote:
I am proud to present the new haifux site, located as (almost)
always at: http://www.haifux.org
Three comments:
1. The link to the mailing list archives stops in early
April 2003; the traffic
Hello list.
This question has been asked elsewhere, but I haven't seen anyone
answering it.
I have occasional problems with artsd (version 1.0.0, as in RH7.3),
which stops functioning (i.e. no sound). It also takes 98% of my CPU,
and a quick look at its /proc entry shows that it has a modest
On Thu, Dec 25, 2003 at 06:06:24PM +0200, Eli Billauer wrote:
The issue is that I can't kill the process. The process number is 11005,
I go kill -9 11005 as root, and nothing happens (no, there is no process
number confusion here). This looks like a kernel problem to me (I'm
using 2.4.21).
On Thu, Dec 25, 2003 at 06:48:05PM +0200, Eli Billauer wrote:
Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote:
Usually, you'll see a processes in an uninterruptible sleep
represented as 'D' in ps. Since you say they are 'R', please do
magic-sysrq-t to see where in the kernel they are.
For those of you who have no
Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote:
snip
Not much. It's a backtrace, but it needs to be resolved. Please use
either 'addr2line' or 'ksymoops' to translate the address (c0109ea8)
to a function in the kernel. You'll need the vmlinux for your kernel
to do that.
This is what ksymoops translated for me
On Thu, Dec 25, 2003 at 08:53:36PM +0200, Eli Billauer wrote:
Trace; c0109ea8 do_IRQ+68/b0
This is probably irrelevant. In Linux, unless configured differently,
interupt handlers run on the stack of the process that was executing
at the time we took the interrupt.
Trace; d0ee7f7f
