Revision: 14642
http://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/harbour-project/?rev=14642view=rev
Author: vszakats
Date: 2010-05-31 08:14:05 + (Mon, 31 May 2010)
Log Message:
---
2010-05-31 10:13 UTC+0200 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar.hu)
* contrib/xhb/hbcompat.ch
Revision: 14643
http://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/harbour-project/?rev=14643view=rev
Author: druzus
Date: 2010-05-31 08:26:06 + (Mon, 31 May 2010)
Log Message:
---
2010-05-31 10:19 UTC+0200 Przemyslaw Czerpak (druzus/at/priv.onet.pl)
*
Revision: 14644
http://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/harbour-project/?rev=14644view=rev
Author: druzus
Date: 2010-05-31 09:46:59 + (Mon, 31 May 2010)
Log Message:
---
2010-05-31 11:46 UTC+0200 Przemyslaw Czerpak (druzus/at/priv.onet.pl)
*
On Sat, 22 Aug 2009, Jarosław Kądzioła wrote:
Hi,
$ hbmk2 testole
hbmk: Processing local make script: hbmk.hbm
hbmk: Processing configuration: F:\msys\1.0\hb-mingw\bin\hbmk.cfg
hbmk: Processing: hbwin.hbc
On Mon, 31 May 2010, Przemysław Czerpak wrote:
Can you repeat your tests with current SVN code?
Not it should link cleanly but I'm interesting if current
^^^
Now
OLE code is really working in WinCE.
sorry for stupid typo.
best regards,
Przemek
Hi,
W liście datowanym 31 maja 2010 (11:56:01) można przeczytać:
PC On Sat, 22 Aug 2009, Jarosław Kądzioła wrote:
PC Hi,
$ hbmk2 testole
hbmk: Processing local make script: hbmk.hbm
hbmk: Processing configuration: F:\msys\1.0\hb-mingw\bin\hbmk.cfg
I used HbMk2 and compared the Libs used by him with my Script Libs, I really
lacked a Lib who was not asked before.
All this now, okay.
Thanks, Ale
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Error-InetInit%28%29.resolved-tp28724310p28729586.html
Sent from the Harbour - Dev
Revision: 14645
http://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/harbour-project/?rev=14645view=rev
Author: vszakats
Date: 2010-05-31 11:04:38 + (Mon, 31 May 2010)
Log Message:
---
2010-05-31 12:58 UTC+0200 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar.hu)
* contrib/hbqt/hbqt.h
*
Revision: 14646
http://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/harbour-project/?rev=14646view=rev
Author: vszakats
Date: 2010-05-31 11:25:39 + (Mon, 31 May 2010)
Log Message:
---
2010-05-31 13:25 UTC+0200 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar.hu)
+
Hi Viktor,
When i'm trying to build WinCE harbour i get :
! Building Harbour 2.1.0beta1 from source - http://www.harbour-project.org
! MAKE: win-make.exe 3.81 D:/cygwin/bin/sh.exe clean install
! HB_INSTALL_PREFIX: D:\harbour\
! HB_HOST_PLAT: win (x86) HB_SHELL: nt
! HB_PLATFORM: wce
Hi,
The error message shows exactly what's missing, install it.
It's not Harbour problem.
Viktor
On 2010 May 31, at 13:57, Jaroslaw Kadziola wrote:
Hi Viktor,
When i'm trying to build WinCE harbour i get :
! Building Harbour 2.1.0beta1 from source - http://www.harbour-project.org
!
On Mon, 31 May 2010, vszak...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
Hi,
2010-05-31 13:25 UTC+0200 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar.hu)
+ contrib/hbwin/tests/oletst2.vbs
+ contrib/hbwin/tests/oletst2.js
+ Added vbscript and jscript test code.
Thank you.
Can you create some more complicated
maybe it could be turned around a bit so that all the llvm/clang
things are moved out of the gnuc block, but at the same time it fits
the way mingw/rsx*/etc are handled now.
i'd say leave it like this, and maybe do some shuffling several clang
and/or llvm versions in the future,
Hello All
Some users of Xbase++ has requested to make available
Harbour distro usable out-of-the-box and with hbXBP to
test their portibility concerns.
I am all set to provide one but it cannot be termed as
_out-of-the-box_ because it still need Qt to be installed
on the machine.
I know we
or possible 2.1 beta?
2010/5/31 Pritpal Bedi bediprit...@hotmail.com
Hello All
Some users of Xbase++ has requested to make available
Harbour distro usable out-of-the-box and with hbXBP to
test their portibility concerns.
I am all set to provide one but it cannot be termed as
Massimo Belgrano wrote:
or possible 2.1 beta?
This has what relation to my query ?
-
enjoy hbIDEing...
Pritpal Bedi
http://hbide.vouch.info/
--
View this message in context:
Massimo Belgrano wrote:
or possible 2.1 beta?
This has what relation to my query ?
I guess it's in relation to avoid a non-official distro
for the sake of HBQT.
Proper solution would be to detach HBQT/HBXBP/HBIDE
release schedule from core and make them available as
a normal extra
Yes Viktor
I think that Harbour official distro is usable out-of-the-box .
I agree that having a separate download for harbour qt Xbase
Extension is rational way but having hbide.exe ready to run in harbour
after setup is very exciting idea
2010/5/31 Viktor Szakáts harbour...@syenar.hu
Viktor Szakáts wrote:
This has what relation to my query ?
I guess it's in relation to avoid a non-official distro
for the sake of HBQT.
Probably.
Proper solution would be to detach HBQT/HBXBP/HBIDE
release schedule from core and make them available as
a normal extra component
Proper solution would be to detach HBQT/HBXBP/HBIDE
release schedule from core and make them available as
a normal extra component which plugs into Harbour core
distribution. (which should be created separately)
Ok.
So how can one obtain the latest binaries including
hbQT, hbXBP,
Revision: 14647
http://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/harbour-project/?rev=14647view=rev
Author: vszakats
Date: 2010-05-31 13:56:40 + (Mon, 31 May 2010)
Log Message:
---
2010-05-31 15:55 UTC+0200 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar.hu)
+
Viktor Szakáts wrote:
Isn't there a runtime only download package somewhere
on Nokia's QT website?
Before exploring this possibility, a little doubt,
is Qt runtime enough for materializing an .exe to be
build with hbIDE ?
-
enjoy hbIDEing...
Pritpal Bedi
Viktor Szakáts wrote:
Isn't there a runtime only download package somewhere
on Nokia's QT website?
Before exploring this possibility, a little doubt,
is Qt runtime enough for materializing an .exe to be
build with hbIDE ?
Yes.
We made the decision at the beginning that only HBQT
Viktor Szakáts wrote:
Before exploring this possibility, a little doubt,
is Qt runtime enough for materializing an .exe to be
build with hbIDE ?
Yes.
If this is the case then we do not need complete run-time
of Qt. Only 4 dll's matching the version we compiled
hbQT* is enough. Can
Before exploring this possibility, a little doubt,
is Qt runtime enough for materializing an .exe to be
build with hbIDE ?
Yes.
If this is the case then we do not need complete run-time
of Qt. Only 4 dll's matching the version we compiled
hbQT* is enough. Can we embed them in our
I need compile hbide in static and my project in dymanic
I have twice qt downloaded and one recompiled to be static using
configure -static
one c:\devl\qt\4.5.3 other in c:\devl\qtst\4.5.3
can i able to compile eitther project (hbide and my) without
recompile all harbour?
2010/5/31
Revision: 14648
http://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/harbour-project/?rev=14648view=rev
Author: druzus
Date: 2010-05-31 16:05:54 + (Mon, 31 May 2010)
Log Message:
---
2010-05-31 18:05 UTC+0200 Przemyslaw Czerpak (druzus/at/priv.onet.pl)
*
Hi All,
..I'd prefer to we follow a Harbour-Fund financing model. That is,
we start making donations to a common-treasure and let project
leaders decide and make hiring agreements for manual creation, or
whatever would help project's improvement.
But, of course, let's hear other harbour
2010/5/31 Viktor Szakáts harbour...@syenar.hu:
Pls note that _anyone_ is free to create a fund and deal with the
sponsoration of doc writing, or any other matter whatsoever. Harbour
admins/core developers aren't needed for this.
In italy if i receive money from internet (to pay doc writing for
Revision: 14649
http://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/harbour-project/?rev=14649view=rev
Author: vszakats
Date: 2010-05-31 17:49:04 + (Mon, 31 May 2010)
Log Message:
---
2010-05-31 19:47 UTC+0200 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar.hu)
* utils/hbmk2/hbmk2.prg
This reads like one of your nice commit logs!
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 9:35 AM, Viktor Szakáts harbour...@syenar.huwrote:
[ After waiting some days for the original thread on user's
list taking any sort of constructive direction, I had made the
decision to ban the thread starter, on the
Hi,
I have been able to compile demohbqt and demoxbp without any problem, but
when trying to compile hbide (hbmk2 hbide.hbp), I get errors like this,
please take a look.
C:/QT/4.6.2/lib/libQtUiTools.a(abstractformbuilder.o):abstractformbuilder.cpp:(.
text+0x1b0): referencia a `_Unwind_Resume'
Hi,
Yes. Pls read relevant section in INSTALL (look for 'HB_WITH_QT')
or past message about this topic, it has been quite well discussed
here.
Viktor
On 2010 May 31, at 20:04, jparada wrote:
Hi,
I have been able to compile demohbqt and demoxbp without any problem, but
when trying to
Revision: 14650
http://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/harbour-project/?rev=14650view=rev
Author: vszakats
Date: 2010-05-31 18:36:22 + (Mon, 31 May 2010)
Log Message:
---
2010-05-31 20:35 UTC+0200 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar.hu)
+ contrib/hbtip/hbtip.hbp
Revision: 14651
http://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/harbour-project/?rev=14651view=rev
Author: vszakats
Date: 2010-05-31 19:00:30 + (Mon, 31 May 2010)
Log Message:
---
2010-05-31 20:59 UTC+0200 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar.hu)
*
Revision: 14656
http://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/harbour-project/?rev=14656view=rev
Author: vszakats
Date: 2010-05-31 23:47:15 + (Mon, 31 May 2010)
Log Message:
---
2010-06-01 01:46 UTC+0200 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar.hu)
* utils/hbmk2/hbmk2.prg
Hi All
- Does Harbour have COMPRESSSTRING(), UNCOMPRESSSTRING() functions ?
(equivalents (?) of xHarbour's CHARPACK() and CHARUNPACK() functions)
( According to a Harbour.chm, yes; according to hbmk2, no; even REQUEST;
( undefined reference to ... ) )
- hbmk2 say :
El 27/05/2010 10:14 p.m., do...@people.net.au escribió:
Above all, please don't take any of the above to be a criticism of anyone
or anything. Especially not you or any of the developers and maintainers
of Harbour and the many contributions.
I have read so much about this lately, that i
I try as partial reply post a prev mail to mailing by Przemek
-
You can make anything what you want with .hrb files body. You only
have to decode it before you will call HB_HRBLOAD( cHrbBody ), f.e.
you can use this function to compress and encrypt .hrb files:
proc encode_hrb( cKey
On Mon, 31 May 2010, Bicahi Esgici wrote:
Hi,
- Does Harbour have COMPRESSSTRING(), UNCOMPRESSSTRING() functions ?
(equivalents (?) of xHarbour's CHARPACK() and CHARUNPACK() functions)
( According to a Harbour.chm, yes; according to hbmk2, no; even REQUEST;
( undefined reference to ...
40 matches
Mail list logo
