Hi!
Massimo Belgrano-3 wrote:
I have post on sybase [x]harbour newgroupI can't test because i am using
v8
are you using acelib,rddads created from ads v9?
I tested with ace32.dll, adsloc32.dll ver 7 on Windows 98SE
and ace32.dll, adsloc32.dll ver 9 on Windows XP
Sample base and index was
You can simply follow sybase ads newsgroup from web
http://www.nntp.hk/web/?server=devzone.advantagedatabase.com
and then click on Advantage.xHarbour
http://www.nntp.hk/web/head.php?server=devzone.advantagedatabase.comgroup=Advantage.xHarbour
2009/4/21 Adam Lubszczyk ada...@poczta.onet.pl
Hi!
I have post on sybase [x]harbour newgroupI can't test because i am using v8
are you using acelib,rddads created from ads v9?
Can you explain codepage problem?
2009/4/21 Adam Lubszczyk ada...@poczta.onet.pl
Hi!
Massimo Belgrano-3 wrote:
Post a sample where you create and use table and
Przemyslaw Czerpak-2 wrote:
[...]
But it's a free project and if someone is interested then he can make it.
In such case I would like to ask to not add such functionality to core
code
but create new RDD in contrib.
best regards,
Przemek
Jesli bym potrafil, to moze bym zrobil :)
If
Post a sample where you create and use table and index
will be a problem of rddads or ads server
you can post also to advantage news group for [x]harbour
Thanks to the growing (x)Harbour comunity Sybase iAnyWhere has added a
new Newgroup in order to serve the (x)Harbour comunity using Advantage
Hi Przemek, You same time ago write:
Przemyslaw Czerpak wrote:
On Mon, 16 Jul 2007, Enrico Maria Giordano wrote:
[...]
It's not necessary. This CDX file uses Windows unicode collation function
to hash index keys. The index key size is twice longer and is unreadable
(check ordKeyVal()).
On Fri, 17 Apr 2009, Adam Lubszczyk wrote:
Hi,
It's not necessary. This CDX file uses Windows unicode collation function
to hash index keys. The index key size is twice longer and is unreadable
(check ordKeyVal()). Such indexes can be created and used only in Windows
because MS haven't
