Re: [Harbour] Visual FoxPro incompatibility
Hi! Massimo Belgrano-3 wrote: I have post on sybase [x]harbour newgroupI can't test because i am using v8 are you using acelib,rddads created from ads v9? I tested with ace32.dll, adsloc32.dll ver 7 on Windows 98SE and ace32.dll, adsloc32.dll ver 9 on Windows XP Sample base and index was created in VFP 6 Massimo Belgrano-3 wrote: Can you explain codepage problem? Normal I use: REQUEST HB_CODEPAGE_PL852 REQUEST HB_CODEPAGE_PLWIN HB_SETCODEPAGE(PL852) //program and dispaly codepage USE base NEW CODEPAGE PLWIN //auto translate PLWIN - PL852 In ADS: USE base NEW CODEPAGE PLWIN //open but not translate Adam -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Visual-FoxPro-incompatibility-tp11612841p23152836.html Sent from the Harbour - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ Harbour mailing list Harbour@harbour-project.org http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
Re: [Harbour] Visual FoxPro incompatibility
You can simply follow sybase ads newsgroup from web http://www.nntp.hk/web/?server=devzone.advantagedatabase.com and then click on Advantage.xHarbour http://www.nntp.hk/web/head.php?server=devzone.advantagedatabase.comgroup=Advantage.xHarbour 2009/4/21 Adam Lubszczyk ada...@poczta.onet.pl Hi! Massimo Belgrano-3 wrote: I have post on sybase [x]harbour newgroupI can't test because i am using v8 are you using acelib,rddads created from ads v9? I tested with ace32.dll, adsloc32.dll ver 7 on Windows 98SE and ace32.dll, adsloc32.dll ver 9 on Windows XP Sample base and index was created in VFP 6 Massimo Belgrano-3 wrote: Can you explain codepage problem? Normal I use: REQUEST HB_CODEPAGE_PL852 REQUEST HB_CODEPAGE_PLWIN HB_SETCODEPAGE(PL852) //program and dispaly codepage USE base NEW CODEPAGE PLWIN //auto translate PLWIN - PL852 In ADS: USE base NEW CODEPAGE PLWIN //open but not translate Adam -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Visual-FoxPro-incompatibility-tp11612841p23152836.html Sent from the Harbour - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ Harbour mailing list Harbour@harbour-project.org http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour -- Massimo Belgrano ___ Harbour mailing list Harbour@harbour-project.org http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
Re: [Harbour] Visual FoxPro incompatibility
I have post on sybase [x]harbour newgroupI can't test because i am using v8 are you using acelib,rddads created from ads v9? Can you explain codepage problem? 2009/4/21 Adam Lubszczyk ada...@poczta.onet.pl Hi! Massimo Belgrano-3 wrote: Post a sample where you create and use table and index will be a problem of rddads or ads server you can post also to advantage news group for [x]harbour I do not create index - it's not problem. If I in ADS make index - all work OK. I must open existing index (only for read) maked by aplication of VFP. Standard Harbour DBFCDX can't open this CDX. ADS open this CDX and work OK except order on field type INTEGER ( STR(field_integer) work OK ) Another problem with ADS is not work with CODEPAGE extension Sample files: http://www.nabble.com/file/p23151376/sample.zip sample.zip Adam -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Visual-FoxPro-incompatibility-tp11612841p23151376.html Sent from the Harbour - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ Harbour mailing list Harbour@harbour-project.org http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour -- Massimo Belgrano Analisi e sviluppo software per Lan e Web - Consulenza informatica - Formazione Delta Informatica S.r.l. http://www.deltain.it/ +39 0321 455962 ___ Harbour mailing list Harbour@harbour-project.org http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
Re: [Harbour] Visual FoxPro incompatibility
Przemyslaw Czerpak-2 wrote: [...] But it's a free project and if someone is interested then he can make it. In such case I would like to ask to not add such functionality to core code but create new RDD in contrib. best regards, Przemek Jesli bym potrafil, to moze bym zrobil :) If I can, maybe I do it Massimo Belgrano-3 wrote: Only a note ads v 9 use visual fox pro 9 data and index and run in win 32-64- and Linux ADS9 has provided support for FoxPro tables and CDX/IDX indexes for a long time, ADS 9 has added full support for Visual FoxPro tables, including auto-increment, date/time, and VarChar fields. Advantage can use its proprietary, high-performance locking with Visual FoxPro tables, but also supports a compatibility mode, permitting legacy applications that access the Visual FoxPro tables directly to co-exist with newer, Advantage-based applications. Advantage adds the new ADS_VFP table type for this support. [...] -- Massimo Belgrano I try it. Open Visual FoxPro CDX, but if index is on field type INTEGER not work :( Adam -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Visual-FoxPro-incompatibility-tp11612841p23134381.html Sent from the Harbour - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ Harbour mailing list Harbour@harbour-project.org http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
Re: [Harbour] Visual FoxPro incompatibility
Post a sample where you create and use table and index will be a problem of rddads or ads server you can post also to advantage news group for [x]harbour Thanks to the growing (x)Harbour comunity Sybase iAnyWhere has added a new Newgroup in order to serve the (x)Harbour comunity using Advantage Database Server. You can join to the news group in: news://devzone.advantagedatabase.com/Advantage.xHarbour Use your own news reader to join 2009/4/20 Adam Lubszczyk ada...@poczta.onet.pl: ADS9 has provided support for FoxPro tables and CDX/IDX indexes for a long time, ADS 9 has added full support for Visual FoxPro tables, including auto-increment, date/time, and VarChar fields. Advantage can use its proprietary, high-performance locking with Visual FoxPro tables, but also supports a compatibility mode, permitting legacy applications that access the Visual FoxPro tables directly to co-exist with newer, Advantage-based applications. Advantage adds the new ADS_VFP table type for this support. [...] -- I try it. Open Visual FoxPro CDX, but if index is on field type INTEGER not work :( Adam -- Massimo Belgrano ___ Harbour mailing list Harbour@harbour-project.org http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
Re: [Harbour] Visual FoxPro incompatibility
Hi Przemek, You same time ago write: Przemyslaw Czerpak wrote: On Mon, 16 Jul 2007, Enrico Maria Giordano wrote: [...] It's not necessary. This CDX file uses Windows unicode collation function to hash index keys. The index key size is twice longer and is unreadable (check ordKeyVal()). Such indexes can be created and used only in Windows because MS haven't documented the collation algorithm and as usual it's not compatible with Unicode standards. So I decided to not add support for such indexes. If you need to use them in [x]Harbour then you can hack DBFCDX and hash index keys with this function but it will work only in W32 - such modifications should not take more then few lines. best regards, Przemek ___ Maybe You make new RDD VFP for Visual FoxPro CDX indexes as hacked DBFCDX ? Adam -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Visual-FoxPro-incompatibility-tp11612841p23094727.html Sent from the Harbour - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ Harbour mailing list Harbour@harbour-project.org http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
Re: [Harbour] Visual FoxPro incompatibility
On Fri, 17 Apr 2009, Adam Lubszczyk wrote: Hi, It's not necessary. This CDX file uses Windows unicode collation function to hash index keys. The index key size is twice longer and is unreadable (check ordKeyVal()). Such indexes can be created and used only in Windows because MS haven't documented the collation algorithm and as usual it's not compatible with Unicode standards. So I decided to not add support for such indexes. If you need to use them in [x]Harbour then you can hack DBFCDX and hash index keys with this function but it will work only in W32 - such modifications should not take more then few lines. Maybe You make new RDD VFP for Visual FoxPro CDX indexes as hacked DBFCDX But it will be still Windows only RDD which cannot be used on any other OSes so it will only increase the gray area of strict MS binary compatibility. Personally I do not like to take a part in such process. But it's a free project and if someone is interested then he can make it. In such case I would like to ask to not add such functionality to core code but create new RDD in contrib. best regards, Przemek ___ Harbour mailing list Harbour@harbour-project.org http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
