Thanks. The routine seems to store and use the name of file very well. I
just modified it to include kprinter and the printing was fine.
Regards
Usha
- Original Message -
From: Kevin Toppenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Friday, June 17, 2005 10:11
There are several conditions to search for,
one of which is Null. The condition list is brought up
by typing ?? at the prompt, for example:
-B- SEARCH FOR EQUIPMENT INV. FIELD: nxrn #
-B- CONDITION: ??
Choose from:
1NULL
2CONTAINS
3MATCHES
Title: GUIMail 2.2.1 available
I just
wanted tosay that if anyone has any problems with version ID's there is a
known problem with this build
that
is easily fixed.
Just
use Fileman and update the CURRENT VERSION Field of Package File entry of CW
Mail to 2.2, and
it
should work.
I guess I wasn't especially clear in my response. Predicate is a
fancy term for operator. In this case you want
Select VA FileMan Option: SEarch File Entries
OUTPUT FROM WHAT FILE: TIU DOCUMENT// 19 OPTION (13279 entries)
-A- SEARCH FOR OPTION FIELD: 1 MENU TEXT
-A- CONDITION: NULL
Is it a link? Try
ls -ld /home/vista/VistA
--- Usha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I tried opening a file in /home/vista/VistA
GTMS
Y=$$GTF^%ZISH($NA(^DPT(1,0)),2,/home/vista/VistA/,MYFILE.DAT)
GTM
But the file is created in /home/vista/OpenVistA directory.
I also tried /tmp
GTMS
Files in Linux don't actually have names. Instead directories are a
special kind of file (but not a special file!) containing a list of
names, and for each name, what is called the inode for that file. You
can think of it as a list (i.e., a directory) of name/inode pairs.
Anyway, every time a
I should add that if a file is a symbolic link, you'll see an 'l' in
the output of ls -l or ls -ld. However, since all hard links are equal,
there is no such clue for the case of a hard link. What you CAN do is
look at the number of links to a file (again in the output of ls) to
see if it's larger
This article from Queue may be of interest
http://www.acmqueue.com/modules.php?name=Contentpa=showpagepid=301
I cannot help but wonder what benefits wireless PDAs have to offer in
terms of the usability (and acceptance) of an EHR system.
The most profound technologies are those that disappear.
Thought this answer would be worth getting
back to everyone and getting it into the searchable archives.
-Original Message-
From: Robert DeWayne
Sent: Saturday, June
18, 2005 8:46 AM
To: Cameron Schlehuber
Subject: RE: [Hardhats-members] Edit
Template fields
Here is
the
I have a very crude debugger that allows stepping
through code. I can get you the code if you want.
Kevin
--- Usha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well how to do that?
Usha
- Original Message -
From: Greg Woodhouse
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
Does it allow source level debugging?
I know Bhaskar has said that Fidelity recommends Serenji, but
obviously, GTM has to provide some level of support for debugging. I'm
just not familiar with the approach it uses.
--- Kevin Toppenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a very crude debugger
Now I understand. Thanks
Kevin
--- Sherman, Paul (CEOSH)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There are several conditions to search for,
one of which is Null. The condition list is brought
up
by typing ?? at the prompt, for example:
-B- SEARCH FOR EQUIPMENT INV. FIELD: nxrn #
-B-
Usha --
You didn't say, but I presume that you have a situation where ^%ZISH
works for files in /home/vista/OpenVistA but not in /home/vista/VistA.
Is this correct?
If so, then it is not a permissions issue, but most likely something in
the application, a typo in user input, etc.
--
Yes, GT.M provides a fairly comprehensive set of functionality (hooks)
for source level debugging down to the line level (i.e., not the ability
to single step within a line), but does not provide any fancy packaging.
or GUI. Serenji uses these hooks to create a much more visual packaging
and
I wonder what happens when values are passed back to Delphi/Pascal from
an RPC call. Since Mumps uses contextual typing and all variable values
are really ASCII strings and Pascal uses typed variables is everything
passed back to Pascal as strings? Or are some of these return values
I believe the Broker knows about numbers, strings and arrays. Of
course, the protocol is completely non-standard, not relying on ASN.1,
idl, or anything like it.
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I wonder what happens when values are passed back to Delphi/Pascal
from
an RPC call. Since Mumps
I thought it was:
Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.
-- Arthur C. Clarke
On Jun 20, 2005, at 10:28 AM, Greg Woodhouse wrote:
Files in Linux don't actually have names. Instead directories are a
special kind of file (but not a special file!) containing a list
That too.
--- chuck5566 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I thought it was:
Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from
magic.
-- Arthur C. Clarke
The most profound technologies are those that disappear.
--Mark Weiser
Greg Woodhouse
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 6/19/05, Bhaskar, KS [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks to Richard Sowinski, GUIMail 2.2.1 is available for download at the
WorldVistA page at Source Forge
I'm not sure if this is an issue everyone is seeing, but when I open
the .zip file from SF.net, some important files are missing (SETUP.EXE
Arrgh! Sorry.
I will work with Richard to get the correct files posted.
Apologies again, Ben.
-- Bhaskar
Ben Mehling wrote:
On 6/19/05, Bhaskar, KS [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks to Richard Sowinski, GUIMail 2.2.1 is available for download
at the
WorldVistA page at Source Forge
I'm
Yes. It utilizes GTM ability to execute one line at a
time. So between each source line, my code is called.
I use $zpos to figure out where in the source code
the execution point is. I then use the top of the
screen to display the context code. So the bottom of
the screen remains unchanged for
Speaking of my debugger (in other thread), I am
considering again a problem I had in creating it.
Because my code is called between every line of the
source code, I have to be careful not to change the
environment, or the program running will be confused.
One of the things to not be changed
I believe there's an entry point in %ZOSV to call the platform
dependent method of getting the last global reference.
===
Gregory Woodhouse
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Better. Faster. Cheaper. Pick two.
On Jun 20, 2005, at 3:13 PM, Kevin Toppenberg wrote:
Speaking of my debugger (in other thread),
Last week I corresponded directly with KS Bhaskar about my wanting to
convert my website http://countyresearch.com, to formats other than
InterSystems and Microsoft. The website is 25 years of real estate data in
FileMan with a Cache Server Pages shell.
Bhaskar was generous and prompt with
[EMAIL PROTECTED] vista]$ ls -ld /home/vista/VistA
drwxrwxrwx4 vistavista4096 Jun 17 11:40 /home/vista/VistA
[EMAIL PROTECTED] vista]$
Usha
- Original Message -
From: Greg Woodhouse [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Monday, June 20,
I would like to have it.
Thanks
Usha
- Original Message -
From: Kevin Toppenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Monday, June 20, 2005 11:02 PM
Subject: Re: [Hardhats-members] Does not ask DEVICE while exporting
I have a very crude debugger that allows
You are correct.
Usha
- Original Message -
From: K.S. Bhaskar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Monday, June 20, 2005 11:28 PM
Subject: Re: [Hardhats-members] Does not ask DEVICE while exporting
Usha --
You didn't say, but I presume that you have a
So it's not a symbolic link. This is a long shot, but you could try
displaying the inode numbers for the two files with the -i option
~:$ ls -id .
189997 .
~:$
You actually have to be root to create a hard link to a directory, so
I don't think it's very likely that this is the source of
[EMAIL PROTECTED] VistA]# ls -id /home/vista/VistA/patmast.txt
6291844 /home/vista/VistA/patmast.txt
[EMAIL PROTECTED] VistA]# ls -id /home/vista/OpenVistA/patmast.txt
4112950 /home/vista/OpenVistA/patmast.txt
[EMAIL PROTECTED] VistA]#
Usha
- Original Message -
From: Gregory Woodhouse
That test shows that these are definitely two different files, not
links to the same file.
My hunch is that there is something in the device handling code that
inserts OpenVistA, perhaps a workaround for something else, I don't
know. You really need to look at the code to see how path
30 matches
Mail list logo
