Subject: Re: [Hardhats-members] Vista-Office -
..worldvista..openvista...opensource... off-topic eh?
Well, riddle me this.. and I just didn't fall off the turnip truck.
Several board members of WorldVista also have a commercial interest in the
success of VistA, along with a few outside
@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Sunday, April 24, 2005 2:11 PM
Subject: Re: [Hardhats-members] Vista-Office -
..worldvista..openvista...opensource... off-topic
eh?
Well, riddle me this.. and I just didn't fall
off the turnip truck.
Several board members of WorldVista also have a
commercial
PROTECTED]
To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Sunday, April 24, 2005 2:11 PM
Subject: Re: [Hardhats-members] Vista-Office -
..worldvista..openvista...opensource... off-topic
eh?
Well, riddle me this.. and I just didn't fall
off the turnip truck.
Several board members of WorldVista
@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Saturday, April 23, 2005 5:27 PM
Subject: Re: [Hardhats-members] Vista-Office
- ..worldvista..openvista...opensource... off-topic eh?
The understanding I got was that we wanted to allow companies
to be able
Subject: Re: [Hardhats-members] Vista-Office
- ..worldvista..openvista...opensource... off-topic eh?
The understanding I got was that we wanted to allow companies
to be able to develop modules that work with VistA, and have
them be propriatary. Even
Several people (as in more than one but less than a billion) have
written to me and said that a big reason that they do not participate,
even though they are interested in VistA is the lack of an open license.
In my previous post I mentioned something about wheels... we should be
flying by now...
Perhaps I am wrong... wait... I know... hard to believe :)
BUT
My point about FOIA's freeness is that it is free, not open.
That is why people take it modify it and make other products from it.
If it where open...it would foster more development. Several people I
know are interested in
I realize, that I am doing nothing but muckraking at the moment...
and, I know that I am NOT by any means a core vista person or
personality. BUT...
I am offended that we call openvista, openvista... it isn't covered by
the GPL or another license that ensures development happens in the open.
The understanding I got was that we wanted to allow companies to be able to develop modules that work with VistA, and have them be propriatary. Even on Linux, one can make a commercial program that makes use of open source technology.
Kevin Doctor Bones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I realize, that I
It is called context Mano. maybe it was lost in translation and nuance.
public domain software is different than open source software which is
different than free software. Open Source is thrown around very loosely
these days.
There are a lot of licenses out there, the license is what
But doesn't that require a license like the LPGL?
Gregory Woodhouse
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Apr 23, 2005, at 3:27 PM, Kevin Toppenberg wrote:
The understanding I got was that we wanted to allow companies to be
able to develop modules that work with VistA, and have them be
propriatary. Even on
-
From:
Kevin Toppenberg
To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Saturday, April 23, 2005 5:27
PM
Subject: Re: [Hardhats-members]
Vista-Office - ..worldvista..openvista...opensource... off-topic eh?
The understanding I got was that we wanted to allow companies
12 matches
Mail list logo
