?
If we can get enough folks involved and committed, this could happen in
a short time frame.
- Original Message -
From: chuck5566 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Monday, April 11, 2005 9:00 PM
Subject: Re: [Hardhats-members] Boston wrap-up.
Well hell
Sure, if there is a Delphi on the Mac, or if you can get a PC emulator for the
Mac.
-- Bhaskar
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of chuck5566
Sent: Wed 4/13/2005 8:30 PM
To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
Cc:
Subject:Re: [Hardhats-members
and
the performance specs.
- Original Message -
From: Nancy Anthracite [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
Cc: Ignacio Valdes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, April 10, 2005 11:31 PM
Subject: Re: [Hardhats-members] Boston wrap-up.
Ignacio, I think
OK, Chuck, So are you still interested? Do we count you as the first to
want GT.M on Apple?
Chris
- Original Message -
From: chuck5566 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2005 11:46 PM
Subject: Re: [Hardhats-members] Boston wrap-up
and committed, this could
happen in a
short time frame.
- Original Message -
From: chuck5566 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Monday, April 11, 2005 9:00 PM
Subject: Re: [Hardhats-members] Boston wrap-up.
Well hell . . .
On Apr 11, 2005, at 5:03 PM, Bhaskar
On Wed, 2005-04-13 at 01:46 -0500, chuck5566 wrote:
Agree wholeheartedly, Chris. I would suggest:
1st - Determining that level of interest, and where it's at.
Are people really interested in a GT.M for OS X,
or would clients on OS X that could
level (CPRS
Chart), or both?
/David.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris
Richardson
Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2005 8:28 AM
To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Hardhats-members] Boston wrap-up.
Chuck;
I spoke with one
@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2005 11:46 PM
Subject: Re: [Hardhats-members] Boston wrap-up.
Agree wholeheartedly, Chris. I would suggest:
1st - Determining that level of interest, and where it's at.
Are people really interested in a GT.M for OS X
and is not designed to be totally complete.
Best wishes; Chris
- Original Message -
From: chuck5566 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2005 5:41 PM
Subject: Re: [Hardhats-members] Boston wrap-up.
Yes you can! I believe the more platforms
It seems to me that there are two different aspects to porting GTM to
OS X. On is, of course, the database and (not having seen the source) I
would expect this to be reasonably straightforward. But the PowerPC
architecture is quite a bit different from the Pentium, and porting the
compiler would
Would that be Mac OS X? -- IV
On Mon, 11 Apr 2005 00:31:29 -0400
Nancy Anthracite [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ignacio, I think it will be ported to the MAC, not Oracle. At the
meeting I
heard two programmers had done it a few years ago and no longer
have their
code, so the hope is to do it
Yes...but it's a hope and not a plan as Nancy said.and
definitely not Oracle.
Joseph
Ignacio Valdes wrote:
Would that be Mac OS X? -- IV
On Mon, 11 Apr 2005 00:31:29 -0400
Nancy Anthracite [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ignacio, I think it will be ported to the MAC, not Oracle. At the
: [Hardhats-members] Boston wrap-up.
Ignacio, I think it will be ported to the MAC, not Oracle. At the meeting I
heard two programmers had done it a few years ago and no longer have their
code, so the hope is to do it again.
On Sunday 10 April 2005 07:54 pm, Jim Self wrote:
Ignacio
: [Hardhats-members] Boston wrap-up.
Ignacio, I think it will be ported to the MAC, not Oracle. At the
meeting I
heard two programmers had done it a few years ago and no longer
have
their
code, so the hope is to do it again.
On Sunday 10 April 2005 07:54 pm, Jim Self wrote
: Ignacio Valdes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, April 10, 2005 11:31 PM
Subject: Re: [Hardhats-members] Boston wrap-up.
Ignacio, I think it will be ported to the MAC, not Oracle. At the meeting
I
heard two programmers had done it a few years ago and no longer have their
code, so
]
To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
Cc: Ignacio Valdes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, April 10, 2005 11:31 PM
Subject: Re: [Hardhats-members] Boston wrap-up.
Ignacio, I think it will be ported to the MAC,
not Oracle. At the meeting I
heard two programmers had done it a few years
? Or is it that
licensing is now owed to Fidelity (it isn't the X86 architecture any more)?
;^)
Best wishes; Chris
- Original Message -
From: Jim Self [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Sunday, April 10, 2005 4:54 PM
Subject: Re: [Hardhats-members
Bhaskar wrote:
I don't recollect anything from the VistA Community Meeting about GT.M
being ported to Mac OS X by anyone in the user community. Except for
running it on Linux in an emulated PC, porting to Mac OS X from the open
source port to x86 GNU/Linux would be a non-trivial effort.
If
Chris Richardson wrote:
Is GT.M Open Source, ported
onto OS X, still Open Source when it is run on OS X? Or is it that
licensing is now owed to Fidelity (it isn't the X86 architecture any more)?
It seems clear to me that if the port was based entirely on the GNU GPL source
for GT.M
for
Well, those of you who know me know that I'M happier than a pig in poop
to read this!:-)
A little tidbit:
Not too long ago, the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
(UIUIC) replaced their 208-node Linux-based system with a 640-node
Apple Xserve system. UIUC is where the graphic Web
]
To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
Cc: Ignacio Valdes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, April 10, 2005 11:31 PM
Subject: Re: [Hardhats-members] Boston wrap-up.
Ignacio, I think it will be ported to the MAC, not Oracle. At the
meeting I
heard two programmers had done it a few years ago
Ignacio,
In the article you wrote: announcement that GT.M will be ported to Oracle.
Is that an error? If not, what does it mean?
Ignacio wrote:
Hello all,
With the gracious help of Nancy Anthracite and without benefit of
actually attending the Boston meeting, I have created this summary of
the
Ignacio, I think it will be ported to the MAC, not Oracle. At the meeting I
heard two programmers had done it a few years ago and no longer have their
code, so the hope is to do it again.
On Sunday 10 April 2005 07:54 pm, Jim Self wrote:
Ignacio,
In the article you wrote: announcement that
23 matches
Mail list logo
