Re: AWT 2D PERFORMANCE ISSUE

2006-08-01 Thread Paulex Yang
Ivanov, Alexey A wrote: -Original Message- From: Igor Stolyarov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 28, 2006 1:04 PM To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: AWT 2D PERFORMANCE ISSUE I think using WeakReference and ReferenceQueue can't help because according

Re: AWT 2D PERFORMANCE ISSUE

2006-08-01 Thread Igor Stolyarov
Thank you Paulex, may be it is that what is needed. -- Igor V. Stolyarov Intel Middleware Products Division

RE: AWT 2D PERFORMANCE ISSUE

2006-07-28 Thread Ivanov, Alexey A
-Original Message- From: Igor Stolyarov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 28, 2006 9:25 AM To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: AWT 2D PERFORMANCE ISSUE I'm sorry. May be I don't clear explained my question. Main target of my question was discussion

Re: AWT 2D PERFORMANCE ISSUE

2006-07-28 Thread Igor Stolyarov
@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: AWT 2D PERFORMANCE ISSUE I'm sorry. May be I don't clear explained my question. Main target of my question was discussion of synchronization of two arrays one of these is java array, second is native array. Main issue of this synchronization is the fact that customer

RE: AWT 2D PERFORMANCE ISSUE

2006-07-28 Thread Ivanov, Alexey A
-Original Message- From: Igor Stolyarov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 28, 2006 1:04 PM To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: AWT 2D PERFORMANCE ISSUE I think using WeakReference and ReferenceQueue can't help because according to RI I have to give customer array

Re: AWT 2D PERFORMANCE ISSUE

2006-07-28 Thread Igor Stolyarov
PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 28, 2006 9:25 AM To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: AWT 2D PERFORMANCE ISSUE I'm sorry. May be I don't clear explained my question. Main target of my question was discussion of synchronization of two arrays one of these is java array, second is native

Re: AWT 2D PERFORMANCE ISSUE

2006-07-27 Thread Denis Kishenko
Igor You suggest optimize rendering on BufferedImage, don't you? You have decision but it has problem, isn't it? I don't clearly understand the problem you have, may be some pictures help us to help you. Could you please explain how Graphics2D.drawLine() will work using new rendering? Thanks

Re: AWT 2D PERFORMANCE ISSUE

2006-07-27 Thread Igor Stolyarov
Denis I hope you understand that I discuss BufferedImage rendering. First of all I offer draw all primitive for example on the DirectDrawSurface which will be cache of BufferedImage and then blit this Surface to the PrimarySurface (Screen). When we need Java access to the Raster of this

Re: AWT 2D PERFORMANCE ISSUE

2006-07-27 Thread Denis Kishenko
2006/7/27, Igor Stolyarov [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Denis I hope you understand that I discuss BufferedImage rendering. First of all I offer draw all primitive for example on the DirectDrawSurface which will be cache of BufferedImage and then blit this Surface to the PrimarySurface (Screen). When we

Re: AWT 2D PERFORMANCE ISSUE

2006-07-27 Thread Stefano Mazzocchi
Denis Kishenko wrote: 2006/7/27, Igor Stolyarov [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Denis I hope you understand that I discuss BufferedImage rendering. First of all I offer draw all primitive for example on the DirectDrawSurface which will be cache of BufferedImage and then blit this Surface to the

Re: AWT 2D PERFORMANCE ISSUE

2006-07-27 Thread Denis Kishenko
2006/7/27, Stefano Mazzocchi [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Keep in mind that most of java people (and most people around here) are server side people. At the very best, they have written one swing application in their life. If you're very lucky, they have written their own swing components (me, for

Re: AWT 2D PERFORMANCE ISSUE

2006-07-27 Thread Igor Stolyarov
I'm sorry. May be I don't clear explained my question. Main target of my question was discussion of synchronization of two arrays one of these is java array, second is native array. Main issue of this synchronization is the fact that customer can recieve reference to the java array and we don't